Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/23/13 in all areas
-
6 pointsThe Nordic model cannot be what replaces our current laws. The SCC struck down these three provisions because they infringed upon the safety and security of workers in a legal business. Implementing the Nordic model would be like telling construction workers they can do their jobs, but anyone purchasing the services of a construction worker could be arrested. Criminalizing clients does nothing to address the dangers faced by workers; in fact, it would likely increase these risks as criminalized clients would not likely be willing to undergo screening. So if the Nordic model is implemented, it will be appealed under the same reasons, and likely be struck down under the same reasons. "Feminists" (read: abolitionists) who want to "save the women and punish the pimps/johns" ignores the fact that there are men and trans* people who are workers, and there are women and trans* people who are clients. Criminalizing clients is not the way to go. We as workers do not want this. As to this talk of workers who are being pimped/exploited/against their will -- we have laws against human trafficking and forcible confinement and exploitation of minors. We do not need laws specific to sex work addressing these issues because we already have laws against them. There are plenty of other employments where workers are trafficked or exploited, and we do not have laws specific to those employments (domestic care/services being a big one).
-
5 pointsThere seems to be a lot of people missing the point. Yes, the Supreme court invalidated three parts of the Criminal Code dealing with Prostitution. So in one year, all things remaining equal, living off the avails, communicating for the purpose, and the bawdy house laws will no longer be valid. In practice I think you will be hard pressed to find any charges being laid under those three sections in the next year. But.... (and it is a big but), that is only if our current laws stay the same. Right now prostitution is legal in this country, and the ruling was made because those three laws were inconsistent with that fact and endangered people pursuing a legal means of work. If the Nordic model, or any other model comes in to effect, that makes exchanging money for sex illegal then all that hard work becomes moot. Brothels won't be legal, because selling sex will be illegal. All this will have been for nought. And stop blaming it all on Harper. He is only one part of this equation, and quite frankly I think he would rather avoid the debate. It is a politicial minefield. Start looking at the ridiculous and completely outrageous statements being made by people like the Elizabeth Fry Society, The Coalition for Abolition of Prostitution etc. etc. They are going to get the press, they are going to be exploiting others to get their point across. And it is not all right wing, nor left wing. It is just not church groups etc. It is a broad spectrum of people who want to criminalize prostitution, and they have a lot of tools to make their point. Target the right people, stop donating or working with groups that support criminalization. Speak out, and challenge the nonsense that we are already hearing, and are only going to hear more of in the coming months. Don't give the media ammunition. Yeah a hard fought battle was won on Friday, but it is going to be a long and bloody war.
-
3 pointsI agree with most of what's been said here already. I would also like to chime in on a few things. Firstly, its important to note that the decision on Friday came after countless years of hard work by the many people who've been pushing for decriminalization through their daily work around this. I think that, if any other model is pushed for by parliament or whoever, and that model doesn't work in favour of safe(r/est) working conditions, these same people will fight it probably until its rejected or struck down. (I don't call myself an optimist for no reason :)) Also, its actually completely illogical what the 'saving women' movement is doing. Do they think that by criminalizing clients and lowering incomes and worsening safety conditions, that that somehow will open up new opportunities in other work sectors or provide us with alternative incomes? No. In fact, the people who will suffer most from these models are the very women they seem to be advocating for (many of whom have told them repeatedly to stop speaking on behalf of them) because by this point they will be in worse financial situations. Criminalizing clients will not end the sex industry and it won't increase employment of former sex workers in the the formal economy, unlike the claims made by said 'feminists'. Also, this: "In 2004, the Swedish police and the Ministry of Justice released a report on the state of prostitution since the 1998 reform, and found that: There were fewer sex clients, but a larger proportion were dangerous Sex workers had less time to assess clients The prices for sexual services had fallen More clients were ready to pay for unprotected sex Sex workers felt that their risk of violence had increased The report also brought to light a new form of crime that had arisen: women posing as sex workers to rob clients (who would fear reporting the robbery to the police for fear of being charged with attempting to purchase sexual services)." From: http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/prostitution-laws-what-are-the-nordic-and-new-zealand-models-1.1603213 Hopefully, law and policy makers make new decisions based on the facts and not on their visions of morality that have proven time and time again to come at the expense of people's health and safety.
-
3 pointsI'll step off onto a limb here. Many times it's fear of the unknown that holds us back. You have someone you have a great rapport with, value as a friend and has many qualities you like. No one would want to lose that in their life so for fear of that, they hold themselves back from perhaps a bigger and greater relationship. As some have said, it could be a signal that there is no interest. You are the only one who can determine if it's fear or disinterest and it may take some heart searching. As I've said before, I would rather risk and have no regrets then play safe and always wonder. I have learned from every chance I've taken, both good and bad. Even during the bad, I would never wish I didn't have the experience. Considering you would fuck her, that says she hold some attraction so maybe you either fear taking it further and having to commit to a relationship or you have no interest beyond the physical. Again, only you can determine that. Good luck.
-
2 pointsGreetings Gentleman, I'm a playful and fun loving seductress whom specializes in the art of complete sensory relaxation. I invite you to take a moment that is delectably indulgent and free from distraction. All while exploring every inch of your body.... Our encounter includes a shower for two, full body relaxation, body slides and stunning conclusion. What we focus on expands, so why not focus on sensuality, relaxation, pleasure, vitality and bliss? :wink: My recommendations: http://www.cerb.ca/vbulletin/showthr...t=sensual+erin Click this bar to view the full image. Discreet and upscale location downtown. My schedule this week: Today 1:30-8pm Tuesday 10am-6pm Friday 9am-9pm. Please send an email to [email protected] or by pm. I look forward to learning more about you and reply to all friendly inquiries. Sensually yours, Erin xoxo
-
2 pointsYou may very well be right ... although I'm not completely convinced. I'm not sure the cat burglar analogy works completely, because that situation does not involve a consensual transaction. In the nordic model you are criminalizing one half of a transaction; the purchase, but not the sale. If doing that puts the seller at risk then that clearly is a matter of concern and might fall afoul of the Bedford principles. Historically the court doesn't like doing things indirectly rather than directly. In other words, if criminalizing prostitution wouldn't pass charter scrutiny, why should criminalizing "parts" of it, when the intention of that partial criminalization is to prohibit the whole thing. This is, it seems to me, at the heart of the Bedford decision. The problem with the burglar analogy, is that you criminalize burglary, there aren't people out there actually wanting to be burgled. You criminalize the purchase of sex, there are people wanting to sell that service. I haven't had my morning coffee, so none of that might make any sense whatsoever. Cheers, Porthos
-
2 pointsOhhh.... I can say that I love reverse massage! Always a treat to be the one being spoiled if my companion likes to massage :) If you ask me I would guess that most MA's feel the same but to advoid disappointment read profiles/ ads and communication before had is always key! Kisses!!! XoX
-
2 pointsFELICIA,24. Outcalls only. 204-957-0561 - 24 Several matches, pic is from a stock image company. Sexy SaraH IS ReadY CaLL. 204-930-0134 Stolen from the gallery below: http://www.hottystop.com/southern-brooke-pink/ Bree, also advertising as Breezy Baby with same pics This pic is all over the place, not even a challenge LOL, but worth a look because she's cute http://images.luscious.net/665/topless_in_yoga_pants_nice_913174075.jpg Rose is New in town, BUSTY hot Asian Girl. Unique Style, WOW EFFECTS, 800-0687 - 2 Picture is of porn star Ai Bome. http://imgur.com/r/AsianHotties/owrg1 These girls bring all the girls on bp into disrepute. That's sad because there are girls who are honest enough to post real pics.
-
1 pointJust wondering if many MAs enjoy reverse massages - I thoroughly enjoy providing them. To me its a 'no-brainer', why not work and enjoy a massage yourself?
-
1 pointI'm ready to play. Monday, Today 10am - 2:00pm You can find me in the west end at Paradise Spa. 613-820-8887 xoxox
-
1 pointIm willing and waiting and wanting to see you. lets get locked in a room together where its nice and warm. Here today, gone tonight. workign fom your favorite place in Bells corners with my sexy eye to greet you. Enjoy your non rushed time with me, but only until 3PM 613.820.8887
-
1 pointCerb is definitely a great place for you to find the lady you're looking for. It can give both of you a chance to peruse photos and postings from the ladies on here, to see who tickles your fancy. A vast number of ladies on here see couples, whether they post it in their ads/websites or not. If you see someone you like, just send them a message and ask, there's never harm in asking! There are two beautiful ladies who come to mind who even have specific websites for couples - Charlotte Sinclair - http://escortforcouple.com/ Alexandra-Sky - http://www.ottawacouplesescort.com/ A few ladies I know purrsonally who I know both ADORE seeing couples are Kathryn Bardot - http://www.kathrynbardot.net/ Nathalie Lefebvre - http://lovely-nathalie.com/ And Gia Wren Marlowe - http://sweet-company.com/ (and speaking of large natural breasts....) Happy hunting :)
-
1 pointJust got home from emergency myself. Last night I had the worst gallbladder attack of my life... the pain exceeded anything and everything I felt when I had my heart attack. WHY DOES EVERYTHING THAT TASTES AMAZING CONTAIN FAT????? Aaaaargh.
-
1 pointExcaliber and Jafo105, I'm so sorry for everything you're dealing with right now. Sending positive energy, strength and hugs to get through this time. JAFO105, your mother has already proven she's a fighter and she'll fight this as well. Excaliber, prayers to your family!
-
1 point
-
1 pointI'm sure anyone who loves redheads, boobies and fripples applauds your efforts in posting beautiful and sexy pics for the masses. Throw in side orders of support, insight and well wishes and you have a wonderful posting combination. Looking forward to more!
-
1 point
-
1 pointI've been thinking lately that I should probably update my recommendations of Savannah Lane and Emily Rushton. However, I am a lazy, lazy man. "Damn, I don't wanna write two recommendations!" exclaimed I. The only way I could think of to get out of this conundrum was to see both at the same time. (poor me, right?) In all seriousness, a duo encounter is something that's been on my mind for some time. Once I found out that Emily and Savannah were having incalls in St. John's at the same time, I tried to get something arranged. Luckily at the time I found out, These two lovely ladies were on tour together. As always, setting up a date and time was seamless, and of course the ladies were more than willing to indulge me in my long awaited fantasy. The date began with me arriving at Savannah's room. We hugged and exchanged one of those deep passionate kisses that long lost lovers are known to do. I have yet to find someone who kisses like her. That alone makes everything worth it! Emily joined us a few minutes later, and the three of us had some great conversation. Once the conversations were done, Emily excused herself to wash up before "getting more comfortable." Before I knew it, Savannah was in her Victoria Secret bra and panties (we have one of those now!!) under the guise that she it was "really warm here." Of course not that I minded! Emily and I joined her state of undress, and the fun began. My highlight of this was me simultaneously unclasping both of their bras while they kissed! Go Me!! Things then moved to the bed. While it did seem that most of their attention was focused on me, they still found time to please each other. I also discovered that the most invigorating sensations were when I was kissing one of them, eyes locked, while the other got down to business on me. The idea of not knowing what to expect really took me on a trip! To say that I was satisfied at the end of it all is a gross understatement. All my expectations were met, and far exceeded! At the end of our date, we stayed on the bed, naked, and having more great conversations. My advice to anyone looking to have a duo experience is to make it with two women who know each other well, and that you have a great connection with. I have been more than fortunate to have met a number of fantastic women on my hobbying journey over the past two years. Any number of these women would make fantastic duo partners. But in the end my choice was a perfect one. Emily and Savannah should be on everyone's bucket list! One less thing I don't have to regret not doing before I meet my maker!
-
1 point
-
1 pointThe two gifts I recall the most were not toys. One was a am/fm cassette player with built in speakers, very high tech for the year I go it and I wore it completely out. Music was my life. The second was a violin shaped music box that played Edelweiss, a song that was very dear to me for no apparent reason. I also always got a GC for a bookstore and would spend hours picking out my books. Back in the day when you could get a few for $20.
-
1 pointStrombecker Road Race set when I was about 8. But it was for me and my older brother. He put 'Oil' all over the track cause he thought he could make the tires smoke. He wrecked it.
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointThis is code for she is not interested and trying to spare your feelings. Just like the good ol' breakup statement.. "It's not you, it's me."
-
1 pointI think the best thing to do is every time the media puts out one of their misleading articles, you take the time to post comments or send irate messages to the lazy reporters who seem unable to do proper research. Don't accept the blatant lies they post. I read one article that claimed that only the 'top tier' of sps want business to continue, 90% want out and work under desperate conditions and/or are forced. Apparently they took the 10% which are actually SW street based workers who work much differently that the other 90% who live pretty comfortable lives and have a lot more choices about what they do, don't do, where they work, and who they see, because they can afford to turn people down. Apparently they are only hearing the voices of some sps, and pretending that those voices are not the majority. I think even the street based workers recognize that anything that can make their working conditions safer or easier is a good thing, and would say that themselves, rather than allowing others to claim that they want out of the business. And I never believe that report anyway. SW goes to a 'help' centre, and the first thing they get asked are do they want help to exit the industry. Sp thinks the help is conditional on them wanting out, so they say "yes'.
-
1 pointWaking up snuggled from both sides by my wife and my lover and then enjoying a tasty breakfast together and the day has only just begun :D
-
1 point
-
1 pointBetter to get the call, then not and have it much worse! Yes, I had a wake up call with my SO this winter! It was an eye opener. We are changing some lifestyle habbits and liking them:)
-
1 point
-
1 pointHappy Birthday my friend! If you are iced in, hope you can get cozy with a good movie, hot chocolate and maybe ....a hottie? lol
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointGlad to hear you're OK. Whenever you're tempted to light up a cigarette, just aks yourself is there is anything more fun out there you could possibly be saving that money towards. Not all butts are bad for your health! ;)
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointIn light of the Supreme Court's reasoning, I don't think the Nordic Model is an option for Canada any more. It may be a political option, and many groups are advocating for it. In addition it superficially seems like a reasonable compromise to many people who don't know anything about the business. It is also appealing to people who just want to just "pull a solution off the shelf" and apply it without any thought. However, I don't think it will pass the standards which the Supreme Court has set. If the Nordic Model is used as the basis for new prostitution laws in Canada, the Supreme Court will likely strike them down too. The underlying reasoning running through the Supreme Court's decision for throwing out the current prostitution laws is twofold. First, prostitution is legal and secondly, the current prostitution laws put sex workers at unreasonable risk of harm, especially street prostitutes. Under the Nordic Model it is still legal to sell sexual services and sex workers would still be exposed to all of the same unreasonable risks as the current prostitution laws, especially those working in street prostitution. If it becomes illegal to buy sexual services, it follows that sex workers can't have safe locations to provide the services such as brothels because clients can't go there. In addition it also follows that communication/screening, especially for street prostitutes, will have to be quick and cursory, (just as it is now) because their clients will be at risk of being charged. That continues to put sex worker's safety at risk. Adopting the Nordic model just puts us back where we are now. It has the same flaws that at least two of the current prostitution laws (prohibiting brothels and public solicitation/communication) have.
-
1 pointI agree. I don't really understand why, if the laws are deemed unconstitutional, as they have been, that they would give a stay of one year. It's basically saying: yes, we have determined that your constitutional rights are being broken, but we are allowing it to continue. Even the Federal Justice Minister Peter MacKay said himself: "A number of other Criminal Code provisions remain in place to protect those engaged in prostitution and other vulnerable persons, and to address the negative effects prostitution has on communities." He basically means that laws prohibiting violence & abuse, exploitation, slavery, kidnapping, unlawful confinement, rape, sex with a minor, coercion, trafficking, public nuisance, and commercial zoning laws are all still in place. That said, then what is the real purpose of keeping these other unconstitutional laws in place for another year? How is it not unconstitutional to keep unconstitutional laws in effect? There is a few reasons that come to mind. None of which I would condone.
-
1 point
-
1 pointI can tell you that one of my best experiences was where I could actually not finish. The finish is a wonderful component but there are many others that make an experience a good one or a bad one. Ive seen about a dozen different mas and most of them were amazing. Some of the ladies that i have met were such wonderful people that if nothing went on in our massage session I would walk out of there just being thankful to have had the opprotunity to get to know such an amazing person. I do not think that me not being able to finish offended her in any way. That being said, would it have made her happier if i were to finish! Of course it would but she was not unhappy because i did not
-
1 pointI generally read MSOG as nothing more than an assurance that it will not be cum-clean-go situation... i like to spend time with the ladies I see so I book longer appointments and stay (not overstay. lol) Multiple Shots.... seldom but my macho side requires that I always keep the option open lololololol
-
1 pointAll you have to do is talk to the lady when booking your session... I am sure anyone that offers msog in their massage can help... honestly is not an unusual request.... sometime I have even offer this option to the person after talking a bit about their likes.., dislikes..., concerns... as a matter of fact i had an experience like that yesterday...
-
1 pointI think cumshots are super sexy I love watching a man cum I think the hottest is COB Im not into COF, that's just me though, I still think all cum shots are sexy :) Kisses and Stay Sexy xxo
-
1 pointI have to agree. We had someone on an ad site out here that got himself banned and recreated handles a few times. He was getting complaints because all he ever wanted was to chat up the sps, and try to get web cam chats out of them, and even admitted the chance of booking any appointments (as in paying for anyone's time) was slim to none. So, my words of wisdom to anyone, is 'don't be that guy." Don't be the guy who sends out pms or starts private chats while in the chat room, knowing full well you are talking to someone you cannot meet, even though you want to. The sps on sites here are advertising, and while they may be interested in general chats, and topics for discussion, what they won't appreciate is the idea that someone who is contacting them and starting up chats and pms isn't ever going to book their (paid) time. Now, if you are interested in paying for the service of pms and sexting and so on, there are avenues for you to pay the ladies who are open to this idea. I do know of someone who used to make herself available for phone calls after receiving a mutually agreed upon fee.
-
1 pointCat.... I am not taking you fishing Manitoba style till we have cybersex or better yet you be my cam girl..... KK Cam show...you show me your tits :) I will text you a penis pic. then lets get busy baby ! If you don't reply EVAR again ...... I get it !!! Maybe I wasn't photogenic at the time...... ? ;)
-
1 pointI find it interesting that no ladies have chosen to respond here. Perhaps it's because they share my view about cybersexing with new clients; it's a no no. 99.9% of the requests are complete wastes of huge amounts time. Just my experience. Not something imo to be encouraged with a provider you haven't met yet, it will most probably leave a most bitter taste on her tongue. If this is something a man craves, he should seek out a cam girl... cat
-
1 pointHad some amazing text chats with some service providers and received so very nice pictures but never anything I would classify as Cyber-sex.... well at least my clothes stayed on during the chat. In regards to the question of Cyber-sex increasing or decreasing the likelihood of my booking with the lady I would have to think it would as I can't imagine taking advantage of a ladies time if I was not serious about booking. Certainly if i chatted with an SP from another part of the country it would increase the chances of me contacting her if I traveled there at some point. Just to be clear view am not suggesting that SP's should be expected to have Cyber-sex as a prelude to bookings.... i fully appreciate that this is the ladies livelihood so I should not expect to take advantage of her time. There are ways to express your thanks to lady who does this for you. :)
-
1 pointSaw Twyla a couple weeks back. As usual, great conversation, sensual, easy going, and actually very legitimate massage with hot stones. One day I'll walk in and actually get a massage alone. This is really the only place that consistently gives truly amazing finishes though: she actually mentioned the lube as a mixture of rapeseed oil, water, and some other stuff; it's really good!
-
1 pointHonestly, the best advice I can give you is to cut out preservatives. It means you have to plan your meals and cook, but it becomes second nature pretty fast and it's FUN. I can guarantee you will drop weight from that alone. In addition, DRINK MORE WATER! No one ever drinks enough and this contributes to bloating and all types of other issues. Thirdly - just move. You like going to the gym? Then go. If you like walking, walk. Take the stairs. Park at the far side of the parking lot. Have sex :) Whatever to keep yourself MOVING !!!!!!!!! It doesn't have to be complicated :)
-
1 pointDefinitely would recommend Emily J! She definitely provides the true definition of cock worshipping! Another provider I would recommend is Sexxxy Rebecca!
-
1 pointI won't mention names unless they post here.......but I experienced it twice in the past year with a couple sweet Cerb ladies. It caught us both off guard both times.....and was awesome. Once I got an "oh oh....sorry" when I could speak I replied "that was awesome" :) big smile best I could do lol The second time I got an "oh my God ! ....I squirted. Are you okay with that?" what I wanted to say was "Fuck yeah that was amazing" !! I couldn't speak well and she got a "mmmm hmmm" and a smile Pretty gosh darn amazing when it does happen.....
-
Newsletter