JoyfulC

OMG, these are so funny I think I just peed myself!! Thanks guys!! :) ..c..

Whoops! That should have been "Freak of the Week." I looked around and I haven't found any clips of it yet. (Someone else did a song by the same name, but it's definitely not the same song.) This was dance party funk, Clinton-style, going way back into the 70s. (Catnip? No way, man! I don't touch that stuff. I never seen that baggy before in my life. That must be Mina's. Ask her, man. It's not mine. I swear it!) ..c..

Okay, so now that we've established that movies made of many of our sexual adventures would be found in the "bloopers" category, tell me what the theme song would be for your movie? And cite the lyrics that sealed the deal. Mine would be Parliament Funkadelic's "Freak of the weak": "Don't give her that one move groovalistic, That disco sadistic, That one beat up and down it just won't do. Don't give her that forever and ever foreplay, She's not looking for the short way, She's got to reach a point where she gets off." Next! ..c..

Good question -- because for many of us, being asked about explicits over the phone or in email might be a dealbreaker. I'm awfully shy myself about being publicly reviewed, but nevertheless, the fact is that, legally, you guys can say things about us that, if we were to say them, might be legally compromising. So maybe it's a good idea to do some research ahead of time on the board to see if an SP is agreeable to the type of service you're interested in. With respect to the money aspect, you can ask the question "is that for complete service?" or "should I expect any additional charges?" This will at least give you an idea of what to expect -- whether the menu is "prix fixe" or "a la carte." Good luck! ..c..

You know what they say: "if you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with!" ..c..

I've had so many embarrassing moments, if they ever make the story of my life, they'll have to call it "Bloopers." But the faceplant stories remind me of something that happened a couple years back. I was playing with someone -- he was lying on some of my funny furniture, and I was standing over him, straddling his face. It was a very warm day, but my friend did not prefer a/c -- so I was getting really hot while I was getting HOT. When I exploded, I felt a bit faint for a second, and my knees turned to jelly. I fell forward into the wall, and sort of slid down it with my face (still twitching and gushing!). After I collected myself, I was quite embarrassed. How graceful, eh? But I had to face him, and when I did, he looked at me and said.... "So? Did you cum??" Uh, no, I just discovered I'm epilectic. But there are two things you'll never hear a woman say during sex: 1) Damn! I didn't want to cum that fast!! and 2) Is it big enough for you? Is it bigger than your last girlfriends? ;-) ..c..

I like Viagra! Depending on the circumstances, it can solve certain problems, and in other cases, it can enhance the experience. I haven't really experienced any situation where someone walked off unsatisfied after using Viagra who wouldn't have if he hadn't used it. Not being able to achieve an orgasm is a whole different problem from not being able to maintain an erection -- the latter of which Viagra is designed (under certain circumstances) to address. But it's never the complete solution, nor is it a solution for everyone. Specifically, gentlemen who've had radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy and who have sustained a certain type of nerve damage may not find Viagra particularly useful. One problem I've noticed is that the top 2/3s of the penis will become erect, but it's not erect near the base. This can render thrusting penetration very difficult. And for many men, thrusting is essential to satisfaction. There are remedies, but it takes a willing and experienced partner. And too, I'd like to note that one of things that seems to make for a most successful golden sex life is the willingness to learn new things about oneself and about pleasing one's partner. Most of us are further from 16 than we are from 60, and so it's silly to keep expecting sex to be like it was when we were 16. Especially since it appears that it might actually be better at 60! Different -- but definitely better. To get there, though, takes an open mind and an adventurous spirit -- a willingness to explore, exeriment, take chances. Fortunately, as we get older, this gets easier -- after all, what do we got to lose??? ;) ..c..

As others have said, it's a highly individual preference. Some are okay with it, some aren't -- some, like myself, actually prefer senior gentleman and specialize in working with them. I'm not thrilled about seeing younger (20s-ish) clients, but I will occasionally if there seems to be some connection there by email, phone or chat. (This video calling stuff is too cool, eh??) I can usually tell whether we're going to be compatible after a brief exchange. Age and other preferences are one thing, but in the end, it's really all about click -- from both sides. I prefer senior gentlemen, but I'd rather see a younger guy I really click with (can laugh with, am on the same wavelength with) than a senior gent I don't. ..c..

Agencies are excellent for guys who like a bit of variety and also like "fresh" offerings -- the new stuff on the market -- but still want the convenience of dealing with someone who knows them and knows their preferences. Agencies are also probably better for guys looking for younger fare. Independents are better for guys looking for an SP they can establish a relationship with, especially someone closer to their own age and/or lifestyle. But with respect to price, actually -- if anything -- agencies should be cheaper. They have the same advertising overhead of independents and, if they're providing premises, the same overhead there too -- but they have more service providers footing the bill. I'm always a bit amazed at the griping and moaning some guys do about the costs involved in this business. If you're getting good service, what of it? This is, after all, one of the most extravagant personal luxuries a person could purchase. And yet, to hear some guys talk, you'd think they were buying milk to feed their babies or gasoline to get to work! Please remember guys, some of the girls in this business ARE ACTUALLY buying milk to feed their babies and gasoline to get to work -- and don't have a lot left over for luxuries like paying someone to give them a blowjob and entertain them. I know that a lot of people in our business like to pose as though they're rich-bitches enjoying every luxury known to man -- but that's simply not the fact. Most SPs are getting by from one day to the next and, if you look behind you in line at the grocery store or the gas station, you may see one of us there. We're not living on our trust funds anymore than you are. We're doing our best to survive in this economy just like you are -- only difference, maybe, is that we might not have as much money to toss at a personal luxury as you do. ..c..

Jillian, I had no idea you were such an expert on the law -- perhaps you misrepresented yourself to me? Myself, personally, as a sex worker with more than 35 years experience both in the US and Canada, I feel that our federal criminal code laws in Canada are already more than fair. If anything, I wish they were enforced more effectively. That, more than anything, would help keep sex workers safe and free in Canada, while protecting communities from the problems associated with our business. Unfortunately, we seem to have two extremes: municipalities that turn a blind eye to some of the laws (like bawdy house) MOST of the time, forcing sex workers to provide illegal services to remain competitive but not protecting them from prosecution; and municipalities that create bylaws that make legal (outcall) sex work illegal on a local level. Canada already has the fairest prostitution laws of any country on this planet. If all the authorities and powers-that-be would both honour and enforce them, we'd have no problem. The trouble arises when some municipalities try to make up their own rules, either by way of arbitrary enforcement policies or bylaws. ..c..

I was with Katie myself for a 3-some just this past week. She is as sexy, as velvety, as lucsious, as warm, and as electriifying as ever. I always look forward to the opportunity. I can't imagine why anyone else woudln't. ..c..

Be advised, though, that's the busiest time of day. You may have to wait a while for your first appointment, and then wait some more for an appointment that suits your schedule. Good luck! ..c..

Most SPs these days have more inquiries than they can possibly book -- do you blame anyone for taking those who seem like a sure thing first? If you want to see this lady, I suggest you be persistent. It's been busy lately, but hopefully if you're nice and make a good impression on her, she'll find some space for you. Good luck! ..c..

This is yet another good reason to work through an agency for the first little while you're in a new town -- especially if you're taking residential outcalls or "no questions asked" incalls. You need someone who has some insight into the local environment to protect yourself. Agencies have their uses. ..c..

Come on! Escorts-Canada isn't all that expensve. One's investment can be returned with a profit in a single session. If some don't want to use EC, my guess is that they're scammers and afraid they'll be exposed by a site that makes an effort to expose scammers. ..c..

Yep, I'm also a bit surprised that anyone at ****************** would even bother to respond, let alone violate any user's privacy over a matter that they really don't know anything about. While CL is free, it's also open to all kinds of scams and dirty tricks, for both advertisers and users. Sometimes it's just better to pay for advertising in dollars and cents than in grief and aggravation. Sure, some guys go to CL or Quest or AAF or whatever, and sometimes they get lucky and other times we see them on here complaining -- but it's important to remember that these are guys who are more into taking some risks and maybe having it work out badly most of the time than those who are looking for a sure thing. There's some rush in that too, I suspect. Hell, there are still guys who go out on the street looking, even though we've heard so many sob stories of guys getting busted, getting ripped off, etc. But for some guys, the rush of the risk is worth any cost. If that's not for you, then you should stick to sure-thing advertising venues -- like Escorts-Canada. But if you like to walk on the wildside and don't mind getting suckered more often than not, then go exploring. ..c..

Although Escorts-Canada is and always will be my #1 choice for advertising, I have placed a few ads on c-list lately and, considering it's free, I got a good return on investment. But there is a problem with it that some advertisers should know about. I had a couple of my ads flagged and removed. As near as I can tell, they weren't inappropriate and were well within standards for posts found there. I was puzzled. (And unlike Escorts-Canada, getting an answer out of c-list is like like winning the lottery -- nice, but the odds are against it happening.) I discussed this with a couple other local ladies who've advertised there as well, and they've experienced the same problem. A couple seem to think it's a certain agency that also advertises there, but really, it could be anyone doing this. So the long and the short of it is, you get what you pay for. When you compare all the different avenues of advertising available to us, I don't think you can beat Escorts-Canada at this time. It's not free, but it's by far nowhere as expensive as The Sun; you get a much better class of clientele than The Sun (albeit a smaller number of responses, the EC responses are more likely to result in an appointment, and also more likely to result in an appointment of at least 1-hour duration or longer); and finally, you get SERVICE with EC. You're not at the whim of someone who has nothing better to do than sit around and flag ads, and because it's a much more targeted venue, complaints are more likely to be properly investigated and questions answered in a timely fashion. ..c..

Yep, that's what it comes down to: what the client wants. If he wants an 18-22 year old, and someone years older who feels she looks younger tries to deceive him, it might be a problem. But if a client wants a 40 year old escort and she just happens to look under 30, that's really not so much of a problem. That's why it's a bad idea to lie about your age. ..c..

Please do! For some things, that would be perfect. ..c..

Please understand that these aren't necessarily "mean" commnets -- just expressions of cautiousness. The lady did reply herself and state that she didn't offer escort service, and so for you to post that she did (even if it was limited private service) seems a bit odd and aggressive. Please understand and try to put yourself in the other person's shoes, if you can. There are a lot of people who try to exploit forums such as these to get information on or harass people. If you're a decent guy, I'm sure you'd never want to be associated with that sort of behaviour, eh? The lady makes it quite clear that she doesn't welcome this type of attention. If she did want it, it would be all too easy for her to post here herself or place an ad. Since she hasn't chosen to do that, your violation of her privacy seems questionable. Please, if you're a decent person, respect that. ..c..

I've often thought about doing this with my place, as I'm only there half a week and it sits empty otherwise. But frankly, I'd worry about people causing me problems with neighbours, etc. People have a tendency to behave very differently when divorced from responsibility. ..c..

I honestly don't know why any escort these days would lie and say she's younger. Might be better to say she's older. Mature women seem to be in vogue these days. If I were into younger men, I could clean up -- but sadly, guys in their 20s or younger just don't do it for me. :( ..c..

Yeah, me too. Because she did come on here and make it clear that she doesn't escort. And so if she did see this guy, and she really doesn't want to escort, it seems odd to me that she wouldn't have requested not to be reviewed. Something weird is going on here. Definitely. Again, I'd caution people to take care not to be manipulated or used by someone who seems to be on a fishing expedition. I don't know that this is the case here, but things aren't adding up. Over the years, I've seen private investigators, debt collectors, stalkers and so many people pull stunts online to try to get info on someone. Err on the side of caution always, I figure. ..c..

Apparently this request for info was completely innocent, but when I first saw it, alarm bells were going off. I would remind people to be very cautious giving information to anyone asking specifically about someone. If that someone wanted people to track her (or him) down, they'd advertise -- it's not difficult. By giving out this type of information, you could be helping someone stalk someone or worse. So please be careful! There is an alternative. You can always get contact info from the person requesting information and give it to the person being asked about. That way, it's up to them if they wish to pursue it. There've been many instances online where a seemingly innocent request for information regarding someone has led to that person's anguish or physical harm. So just a reminder to use some common sense. Christine

Actually, I'm back in the Westboro area now -- just a few blocks from where I was back in the 90s. But I'm only around a few days a week. ..c..