Jump to content

weeder

General Member
  • Content Count

    73
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by weeder

  1. She is indeed hot. She's nice, personable and has a great rack. She's not reviewed much these days, as she has been around for quite a while, and her novelty has worn off. But she's A+ in my books.
  2. No, I wasn't expecting Jessica Simpson. I was just answering brownie13's question. I was fine with her looks. She's not too hard on the eyes, and rather pretty in a girl next door kind of way. Just not drop-dead gorgeous. 7/10 is not ugly. I still stuck my cock down her throat and put my face between her legs, then banged her until we both couldn't walk straight, and thoroughly enjoyed my time with her. BTW, I saw her last spring, shortly after she came on the scene, before she had many pictures on EC or had her website up.
  3. I'd say she's a 7 out of 10. She's okay, but you'll never see her on the cover of Vogue. If I recall correctly, she's got some sort of tooth thing going on, could use an orthodontist.
  4. It is a gay bath house, but Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturday and Sunday evenings are co-ed. There are SPs who frequent the place, but them being there is very hit and miss. When they are there, they've usually already set up an appointment with someone, and are pretty much just there to meet him. Doesn't mean you can't negotiate something with them, but they're not prancing around asking every guy in the place if they want to sleep together for money, so be discreet about it.
  5. She posted a message on another forum saying she's moving to Calgary, and asking for advice on the SP scene in that city. So you'd better book an appointment with her fast, before she's gone.
  6. I've seen Chantal once and would probably not go back to see her again. Her pictures look better than she does. Her chest is enhanced, and rock hard. Service is uninspired. In FS she sort of treats it as a race to get you off as quick as possible. I went away relatively happy, but in retrospect I've had much better. Take a look around at this site and others. You'll see few reviews of Chantal, and those that you do find are not glowing reports.
  7. Yeah, you get what you pay for, but $1000 bucks? I can get 5 two hour session with highly regarded local ladies such as Kyra Rivers, Kerry, or Kayla for that amount. I agree that a $100 SOG from some girl at hanging around the VLT's at the Mount Royal Hotel is not going to be as good as a $250 SOG with Chanel, but is Classy Angel that much better that Chanel?
  8. Although she seems to have dropped out of sight (pursuing other interests for a while) Maggie Belair has one hell of a body. I believe she's 43, with a few lines around her mouth, but from the neck down I swear she's 21. A body like a ballerina.
  9. A couple of people on this site have mentioned how "shocking" she is. What exactly is so shocking about her? And how old would you say she is if her ad says 21?
  10. I saw her in early March. My experience was pretty much the same as dessijatt. She's cute, but not drop dead gorgeous. She is a college student and only does this on her days off school. She mentioned a few times that she had just recently gone independent. She used to work at an agency in Thunder Bay a year or two ago, and perhaps at a MP in Winnipeg recently. Incall was at a nicer downtown hotel. The session was okay, but nothing earth-shattering. She's friendly and chatty and enthusiastic for just about anything you suggest. A bit smaller in the chest, wider in the hips and more belly fat than I had thought. Average CBJ. Very responsive during DATY and FS. I was exhausted from a grinding work schedule and didn't have the energy for a 2nd SOG, and she didn't suggest it. Don't think she would have been too enthusiastic even if I had brought it up. I paid for an hour and after 55 minutes I felt she was rushing me out the door. Probably would not repeat soon. I heard from another respected member here, and his experience was about the same as mine. He didn't think he'd repeat either.
  11. Total bonerack. Give the poor girl a pizza or a cheeseburger.
  12. Average in appearance? Okay with performance? Are we talking about the same Chanel here? Namely ... http://kama-sutra-chanel-exclusive-companion.com/ I had the pleasure of spending time with her two weeks ago, and I can honestly say I have never had better. She has the body of an Amazon woman, her breasts and ass were crafted by a master sculptor, her face should be on the cover of Vogue, her massages are so damn relaxing and the service is 10/10. She definitely gets into the session mind, body and soul. I have read MANY other reviews that have nothing but GREAT things to say about her.
  13. I had a session with her about two months ago and was not terribly impressed. I still left with a smile on my face, but upon reflection, I don't think I would repeat. I agree with alextrebeck that there are better SPs to spend your money on.
  14. Does anyone have any more info on this lady?
  15. The service will be the same wherever it is. The question is, what do you want? Do you want her to come see you at your house or hotel room? Or would you like to go see her at her place?
  16. I think you're giving them too much credit. It's not like they write up a business plan or get an MBA to work in this field. Many of them see very short term and don't quite buy into the "give the customer 110%" theory. As long as the guy has a post-coital goofy grin on his face as she shoves him out the door, she thinks she's done her job. In my experience, it's not until I've had a few hours (sometimes a day) to reflect back on the visit that I develop a feeling for how well it went. I mean, catch me in the hallway outside her door and still pulling up my zipper, stick a microphone in my face and ask me how I enoyed it and I'd probably say "hey she had tits and a pussy, and made me come. I'm leaving happy". Then when I get back home and really think about the ups and down, the ins and outs, that I actually say "yeah, she was great" or "naw, I wouldn't visit her again".
  17. I can vouch for the nose candy thing. I called her up a few months ago and she said that she was "a bit sleepy from having done so much blow", and asked me to call her back the next day. Ummm ... thanks, but no thanks. I don't expect these ladies to be saints, but I do expect them to be relatively clean, from a chemical point of view.
  18. On another site it a reviewer said she only does "safe DATY", which I assume means she uses a dental dam or some other sort of barrier. Not for me, thanks. I don't have a problem with CBJ, but I draw the line at CDATY. That's 90% of the fun for me, and pretty well the main reason I go to see SP's.
  19. Well, the photos sure look like it, but under her mail setting she has "Must not be looking for Other Relationship" and "Must not be looking for Intimate Encounter". And from the rest of the text she wrote, it doesn't sound like she's an SP.
  20. I agree with farmboy. Saw her a couple of weeks ago and was not overly impressed. I wouldn't say I wasted my money, but I wouldn't repeat either. She is cute and chatty and enthusiastic, but she doesn't go out of her way to encourage MSOG and she's a definite clock-watcher. I booked for an hour and after about 50 minutes she was practically leading me to the door.
×
×
  • Create New...