rubintugger

Yes, a toy poodle can be dangerous to other animals and its owner. It has teeth and a powerful jaw. Generally, dogs do what they are trained to do. Until a bulldog is trained to fight, its isn't a killer. Neither are Rotti's, Chows, etc. And even after they have been trained to fight, and abused into that horrible bloodsport, they have been rescued and become loving pets. Some, however, never recover, and must be destroyed. Like thousands of "aggressive" dogs that are put down each year by "humane" societies, because they are dangerous and not adoptable. Yes, "humane" societies the world over destroy all breeds of dogs for aggression. Chihuahua's to Dane's, if an animal is abused bad enough, or bred bad enough (backyard breeders, doing designer dogs that are inbred beyond belief), it can be dangerous to other animals and its owners. Yes, any dog can be a weapon. It isn't hard to do. But not every bully becomes a vicious fighter. The vast majority end up as victims in the ring, because they can't fight. But, like a police dog that fails its training, they can make great pets if not abused and ������ to fight. Some are more dangerous that others when used as a weapon, due to their physical stature. But to ban something for the potential they have to be bad, without them displaying any bad behaviour, well, that's just wrong. It is something our society has to rise above, racial profiling. Judging danger based on appearance is not what a civilized society does. There are laws on the books to handle dangerous/vicious dogs. There is no need for one based solely on breed.

Lol. Really. When was the last child killed by a dog in Manitoba? Wasn't by a bully breed, it was by a malamute. So, you can forget your stereotype. They aren't fighting dogs any more than a pug or an english bulldog is. Chows are far more dangerous and unpredictable. Problem is that idiots make bully's fight. They abuse them and beat them into fighters. Any breed could be made into a fighting dog treated the same way.

Yes, I know... what I was saying is that we have a vicious dog law, there is no reason for there to be a breed specific law as well.

Unfortunately, too many people think this way. Pitbulls cause so many deaths and injuries. But, like the gun lobby, the argument is pitbulls don't kill people, pitbulls trained by people to be bad kill people. The pitbulls involved in deaths are usually involved in dogfighting, and a abused to the point of being dangerous. The people that get killed are those involved as well, and sometimes their family or neighbors. The vast majority of bully breeds are not subjected to the maltreatment and abuse that creates the vicious dog. The vast majority would never hurt a fly. Winnipeg does have a vicious dog by-law, which is not breed specific. Chihuahua to Great Dane, if your dog is a threat to people or animals, it can be dealt with by the authorities. So there is absolutely no need for a breed specific ban. Breed specific bans are based on looks, not actions. Which is not fair. Especially to those bully breeds that get rescued and need good, kind homes. Those people that want these dogs cannot have them. sad for both, really.

"It"? Wow. Here's a thought for you. If you suspect an SP is trans, and you are worried about the idea of sticking your dick into an attractive female that used to be the same gender as you, ask. While a trans person may not wander around proclaiming their genetic makeup, when asked, I'm pretty sure they aren't going to lie about it. If she has transitioned completely, and can function in all ways physically as a woman, then I can't see the problem. If anything, if she matches her pictures, and you are attracted to those, where is the problem? And, with her background, she may have some interesting insights for your session. My only problem would be if the pictures have been stolen or photoshopped, and she is not as promised. But that would apply to any SP. There are some absolutely stunning transitioned females out there, who can finally live their lives as their brains are wired. Holding a cruel joke of birth genetics against them is very small minded.

Nothing like a cougar first experience... more about the techniques than the stamina... sure a younger girl might be more athletic, but there is no match for experience...

So, you got a penguin?

A traveling SP that has built a clientelle here over the years could probably book here entire time here and even get it prepaid with her regular customers. Someone new, however well reviewed elsewhere, would have a tough time achieving that. Not saying it can't be done, but it would be a real stretch. Building a client base is a tough task for any saleperson (and believe me, any SP has to be a darned good salesperson). Giving us notice, booking appointments though an 'ERB board with verified solid posters could give you the base you need to justify the visit, and cover costs. With each visit, you will build a base, IF you provide services that warrant it. Eventually, this could be a wonderful spot to visit for you. The first visit, or two or even three might be a tough go, but look at it as an investment. Some investments pay off big. Others, not so much. You will never know until you try. You might even try PM'ing a few regular posters that seem to prefer your style of practice, and offer a prebook special to lessen your exposure. Whether that is a discount off your normal rate, or an incentive in extra services or time, give them a reason to prebook. Get your costs covered before you get here. Added bonus, you have instant reviews by respected posters. There are a number of newer hotels near the airport, some more SP friendly than others. Parking is easier there. Downtown there are hotels and suites that work, and will give you access to the town in your off time, but parking is harder. There are extended stay condos as well, if you do your research, depending on the length of your visit. Good luck with this, Winnipeg gets a bad rap sometimes in this community, but there are a lot of quality gentlemen out there. You just have to help them find you.

For a moment there, I thought you were wondering id that would work as an advertisement. I know the Dauphinites are the most metropolitan group around, but I don't think they'd fall for that line. Now, if you were going to Regina, a "Mobile Virgin" ad might work.

What could a by-law enforcement officer see? That would concern him enough to call WPS? There is lots of parking, she has a very long lot. She provides a very legitimate service, including excellent foot massage. It almost seems like these threads are filling with anti-shills. That is OK, though. Any customers you scare away from her means booking an appointment gets easier. I'm not suggesting people do irresponsible things, there are a lot of dumb things a pooner can do. This, however, isn't one of them. Seeing an underage SP in a house that has drugs and children in it, that's dumb. Seeing a legit massage provider in her home, not a big concern.

Wow, I'd love to see them try that one. They would end up under a pile of paperwork, with some explaining to do.

So, how was the followup? I guess it didn't happen. Because they were just trying to put a scare in you, and man, it worked. That location obviously has a valid business permit, so they can't shut them down for that. As far as I see it, unless someone admits to having sex on the premises, (which to my knowledge is not happening there) which could give them probable cause to bust the door down to try catching patrons in the act, pretty much a non starter. As for any lists they might compile, for what purpose? Unless someone inside lies about what is happening, and actually knows your name or license number, what is there to be concerned about? I'm no lawyer, but if the police published a list of people going to a legitimate business, or even an illegitimate business, and insinuating that something illicit happened without any actual proof, man, there would be lawsuits. Pulling a few guys over and putting a scare into them is probably the worst they can/will do. Even that is pretty bold, I'm not sure I'd answer any questions. Maybe a "Yes, officer, I availed myself of their fine hospitality and had a lovely relaxing massage. You should try it, you seem tense. No, I wasn't offered any illegal acts, nor am I aware of any taking place. Just had a massage. Is that illegal? No? OK, thanks, I have things to do. Buh Bye"

Just curious, why would there be surveillance? Operating a business out of a house is a bylaw infraction. Big whoop. No LE involvement, seriously. Now, if there were illegals being held as sex slaves, or minors, sure. Then LE is there. Is some bylaw enforcement officer going to bust down the door and slap you in cuffs for getting a massage in an unlicensed venue?

I guess, as long as she has clients lined up at the door, there's no reason to change, is there? If someone was to, say, not tip her if she answers the phone, or rushes you out early, and make sure she knows why she wasn't tipped, that might make it worth her while to change. But I doubt it, she would just not bother to book that guy again ;)

Brothels, while "safe" are pricey. And inconvenient. I carefully scoped out the backpage/review boards, looking for the experience I wanted, and wasn't disappointed with the quality or the price.

Seriously? Is there anything in the ad to suggest anything to be discussed on this forum? Yeesh.

Nail on the head, there...

wpgsteve, did you go for the basic service, or did you go all out?

Yes, the *ahem* massage market is quite active, but far less here than in places like Toronto or Vancouver, where legal "massage" places are everywhere. Here there are but a handful. RMT's are probably more intimate with our physical bodies than anyone else in society, even moreso than doctors, spending an hour or more in a session in physical contact with a large part of our epidermis. It is natural that thoughts extend that closeness to other parts not normally contacted... but those are just thoughts, never a reality. Hence the existence of "massage" places.

I'm not sure which RMT's you are referring to, but the consensus on actual RMT's is that none locally provide "extras". There are plenty of unregistered masseuses that work in various places like hair salons, etc, that provide happy endings, but not actual RMT's working in legit massage places that can provide receipts that Blue Cross would accept. The amount of training to get a license just isn't worth losing it for getting caught providing "extras". It doesn't stop the occasional wild speculation, or wishful thinking poster from coming on and conjecturing or even lying about a verbotten session with an RMT.

Does an increased room rate affect the "tip" the ladies get? Is the honorarium total still the same, just a different split between house and lady? Or does the price increase make them more expensive than an indy? I know some guys might think that an MP girl deserves the same pay as an indy for the same service given, but please take into account that the MP girl does not have any overhead except the clothes on her back. No marketing, no cell bill, no rent, towel/linen laundry, etc. She also can see more clients and see them reliably. There is a reason ladies choose the MP life.

I have never been to Nevadas, but I would suggest that paying an MP girl more than an indy wouldn't make much sense, so if it were me, I would take what I would be willing to spend on an indy, pay out the room fee, and what remained would be a *reasonable* tip for the lady. With an opportunity to earn a tip for exceptional services rendered. Expecting to get an MP girl for less than an indy is not reasonable, with the MP's hands in the pot. My reasoning for that is that the MP girl works there for a reason, security, no hassle client providing, no incall overheads. So, $200-220 less the room fee should be reasonable for a standard session. In my honest opinion. Not being a partaker, please correct me if I am wrong.

Not sure if anyone else got an unsolicited PM from a member with 6 posts for info about 2 ladies, but I did, and found it annoying. There were not ladies I have ever reviewed, or mentioned that I had seen. I may have commented on threads they were mentioned in, but that would be as close as I would have to having any info about them at all. So I responded: Don't know why you are asking me, I don't know you, or either of the women you requested info about. I am responding this time out of courtesy, please do not abuse PM's like this. Keep your inquiries public, and use PM for clarification or requests for more specific information, not general "do you know anything about" questions. This board only works in its members *exchange* information. A member who has made a large number of informative posts will get much better responses from other members. Share your experiences is you want others to share theirs. Am I being unreasonable?

Chrissy, Christy, Christie, Summer, sometimes two of those in one ad...

Not sure where you get your info from, but I was at Southpointe this week, and everything seems business as usual. Its almost like a shill post. I've been to both, and there is no comparison. When Rose was the main attraction at Ness, things were OK, but nothing spectacular. After finding South Pointe, I have never been back to Ness, nor do I have any desire to. But to each his own.