Jump to content

freestyleswimmer

General Member
  • Content Count

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by freestyleswimmer

  1. This is a PM I received from a member. Don't try to guess. His name spelling does NOT correspond to the number of "?" in my "Hi ????????????????" Here is my reply. It might be disappointing to some (most?) of you but I feel that I owe Cat a certain degree of confidentiality (as to details) leaving it up to her to respond to specific enquiries. I know that she did not deceive (or disappoint) me in any way. Hi ?????????????? I know that this is a review and recommendation board, however I do not feel at all comfortable going into any further details. I don't want to lead anybody on, giving them false hopes nor do I want to inhibit anyone from -maybe- going further than I did (if she will allow that). She is a lady (at least that's how she acted with me) and is a very subtle seductress (Never have I wished as hard that an hour had 240 minutes so that the voyage of discoveries would have been even more terrific.) I would never say anything about this one lady (who impressed me very much), even in a PM, that I wouldn't say in Public (Forum) and that is why I'm posting here a version of this P message. Sorry about this, but I'm sure you (added in this post: future visitors) won't be sorry.
  2. Gmail has a SPAM folder on-line (that doesn't get downloaded to my email client). I checked there, but no. I had inadvertently sent my email from my other ISP's persona and that one does not keep SPAM or Junk (that I know of). I am glad that the lady understood that such things can happen and was not mad at me. Exactly. Treat them as the ladies that the greatest majority of them are and they'll (re-)act accordingly.
  3. I have recently had a rendez-vouz with Catherine St. Claire in Ottawa. She is absolutely everything she says she is on her site and more (apart from being -in my eyes- drop_dead gorgeous). Details of services provided will have to remain between us, given that mileages vary but everything we did together, from the friendly, smiling greeting, the easy conversation, the very smooth transition from talk to walk (towards the inner sanctum), to asking if I had any buttons I would not want pushed, what more can I say? Conversation, attitude, sense of humour, looks, did I say "attitude" already?. BTW, this is definitely not a shill, so I'll stop waxing poetic about her.
  4. Wouldn't it be absolutely hilarious to be a fly on the wall (specially in Ottawa) and see the looks of stupefaction on several faces as they recognize one another from the Media, Parliament, Government (all levels), the Arts, the various religious organizations, you name it?
  5. I posted this in error on the Massage Forum. It was meant to be here. When initiating contact by email .......... ........... always ensure that both outgoing and incoming emails have been received, following up with telephone calls. Learn from my (not mistake, but) mishap. A few weeks ago, I contacted a soon-to-visit-Ottawa lady from Montreal, asking if she would be free on weekday x at 6pm (I finish work at 5pm) and where would she be staying (for the incall) and incidentally what her hourly rate was (her website ad didn't say). I never heard from her and thought that, OK, she did not like something about my email or my name (I did use my real email). (Att Lady. If you're reading this, you know who you are and who I am. Only the Mods here know my true identity. Let's keep it this way until my ashes are scattered over ....wherever.) Then imagine my surprise when I received on day x, late in the evening, an email from her wondering where I was, why I didn't show up for our 6pm rendez-vous. (I liked the fact that she sounded -in writing- more worried at my not showing up than ired at my having stood her up). I searched throughout my email client and could NOT find any trace of that email. I emailed her back -expressing my apologies for an error not my own- and opining that the only explanation that made sense to me (as a geek) was that, perhaps, my email provider (I use two: Google's gmail and another one) had deleted her email as SPAM since the Subject contained the string "escort". Her reply with a blank subject reached me without problem. I immediately phoned her and we laughed about this over the phone and made another rendez-vous. The moral of the story: Always make absoluterly certisure that your communication is 100% clear, received, ACKnowledged and understood. Good luck.
  6. ........... always ensure that both outgoing and incoming emails have been received, following up with telephone calls. Learn from my (not mistake, but) mishap. A few weeks ago, I contacted a soon-to-visit-Ottawa lady from Montreal, asking if she would be free on weekday x at 6pm (I finish work at 5pm) and where would she be staying (for the incall) and incidentally what her hourly rate was (her website ad didn't say). I never heard from her and thought that, OK, she did not like something about my email or my name (I did use my real email). (Att Lady. If you're reading this, you know who you are and who I am. Only the Mods here know my true identity. Let's keep it this way until my ashes are scattered over ....wherever.) Then imagine my surprise when I received on day x, late in the evening, an email from her wondering where I was, why I didn't show up for our 6pm rendez-vous. (I liked the fact that she sounded -in writing- more worried at my not showing up than ired at my having stood her up). I searched throughout my email client and could NOT find any trace of that email. I emailed her back -expressing my apologies for an error not my own- and opining that the only explanation that made sense to me (as a geek) was that, perhaps, my email provider (I use two: Google's gmail and another one) had deleted her email as SPAM since the Subject contained the string "escort". Her reply with a blank subject reached me without problem. I immediately phoned her and we laughed about this over the phone and made another rendez-vous. The moral of the story: Always make absoluterly certisure that your communication is 100% clear, received, ACKnowledged and understood. Good luck.
  7. Don't be too harsh on them. Maybe the guy in charge has only ever heard of or received CBJs.
  8. Great minds think alike. I did do that and I got "rendez-vous"s and an email reply of appreciation (for letting the lady know + or - what to expect). One lady, whose photo I requested, sent me two very classy ones (in an evening dress) and I appreciate that. Needless to say, they will never be published or shared (even in cases of +ive reviews).
  9. You are correct, LoneSkater, that what goes on in a person's brain has nothing to do with language (usually) but the writing is influenced by one's original (mother) tongue, specially spelling and phonetics. And Jessica was not using it as a criticism (in my opinion) of Francophones but as a clue to the similar identities of the poster's and the agency's "persona" (personae?) "agencie" is obviously an anglicized french "agence" The absence of the "s" in guys is not unusual. Gentelmen is quite close to Gentilhommes where the "l" does not follow the "t" and their second advice is spelled "advise" whereas their first one was spelled correctly. He (or possibly she) should make up his/her mind whether they're talking to one guy or to several guys. No insults intended and I hope no offense taken. But language(s) does(do) tell a story.
  10. Thanks, Jillian. You said it very well. The thing is -for some men at least- part (or a very large part) of the chemistry is a beautiful face. I understand the need for anonimity when ladies post their pictures and so we get the up-to-the-chin shots, the blurred faces, etc.......... You manifested that you would be prepared to call it (on/off) within five minutes. Speaking for myself, if I did not find myself strongly attracted to the lady's face, I would say nothing and go through the motions. I can't ever imagine myself telling a lady -whatever honeyed words I might use- that I just don't find her attractive (enough)! I believe that most of these ladies who post those non-face pictures do it so as not to be recognized by family, friends, co-workers, neighbours, etc.... and I sympathize. I would say that if a rendez-vous was to be arranged for a first-time encounter, the lady would send a picture of herself, if asked. But then, we get into the territory of trust. Will this lady trust that would-be visitor to show up at all or, maybe, to not publish her face all over the Internet or even threaten her with the threat of publishing it? If only someone would invent a trustometer! ;)
  11. I have often seen this "Request for Volunteers". I'm sure some of us would willingly sacrifice time and efforts for the team. But, since it's for the team, shouldn't the team be bearing the expenses?
  12. I have found that most Indies will click, or (rarely) not click, with the caller and establish a friendly rapport. If the sense of humour of both is on the same wavelength and the man is a gentleman (no joking beyond whatever boundaries she establishes by taking her jokes to that level first), they (the ladies) will usually make it a very easy conversation.
  13. ..............then please let me know. It's an animated GIF While displaying "Attempting to give a damn" the progress bar is supposed to run and then the display changes to "Process Failed. Damn not given." But I guess it was too large a file to upload. Thanks
  14. Thanks and will keep that in mind when (IF) I post a poll.............. Cheers
  15. The thing is, as many have also indicated, PMMV (P = peoples', yes plural) so if A got DFK'ed, B, c and D might not. (Lower case "c" not intended but I decided to leave it as is.)
  16. .............posts 2, 3 and 4 above. Most (if not all) the points made should go without saying (for gentlemen, that is). Respect towards the lady, a "click" (or not), cleanliness (and self-respect) all play a part in how humans interact. (I just caught myself in time. I had written "....how humans intercat." I guess I was thinking of a certain "Southern Belle".) What had gotten me thinking along the lines in my original question was the fact that on many "Review" not "Recommendation" boards many gentlemen would add a repeat rating (Yes, Probably, probably not and Not) to their ratings and in most cases they blamed the lady/ies. I can't recall a single case when a (gentle)man admitted it might have been him.
  17. and if PC MasterCard, President's Choice points............... (P.S. I'm NOT shilling for Loblaw's.)
  18. Hi On other sites (not escort related) but using software for the Forum that is almost a clone of yours, I have seen polls that did allow multiple-choice responses (like check-boxes in html rather than radio buttons.)
  19. I said "which" not "who" so get your minds out of the ........... never mind. I am a newbie (board-member and does this sound impressive or what? "Board-member", I meant, not "newbie") and browsing around, I find that the generally held view is that "regular" SP visitors/clients/friends get more Mileage than first-timers. OK; everybody's MMV. Fine. However if a lady does not provide a certain (minimum) degree of satisfaction on the first visit, there will be NO repeats. So how does one become a regular otherwise? I'm not starting a poll but who of us has repeated after an unsatisfactory first encounter (even if she looked like Aphrodite --- the Greek Goddess, not the SP---or Venus---whom I don't know anyway.)
×
×
  • Create New...