buggernot

Totally...you just got to be able to prove it first ;)

I so feel like a token being handed to a cabbie right now..

I shot JFK. First 25 girls to respond will receive the honour of having sex with me FREE for a year. And if you PM about it within the next hour, as a bonus I'll tell you where Jimmy Hoffa is... Posted via Mobile Device

Guess we don't boot people for the sake of having some kind of habeas corpus... Posted via Mobile Device

I think things will probably slow down here in the immediate future. Not just some economy fears but hey, summer's coming...most people don't want to be indoors in front of a computer. Indoors fucking is something else altogether ;) But I have noticed a definite drop in postings as a whole with the appearance of the sun in the last month. I probably wouldn't have noticed it as much had I not been laid up with a nasty illness for the last 3 weeks. Damn you swine flu!

With the conditions as they are, the rec would probably be better to be removed. It's fucking ridiculous that your name being associated to having been with a girl is causing her grief but, since that is the case, removal could be the best thing to do. Only problem is, if you were the one that started the thread and people posted other glowing reports afterwards, I'm assuming that the whole thread would be toast? Maybe ask the SP what she wants in that case. I agree with some of the other points made about removing a rec where someone has gone back and had less than memorable experiences. We always preach YMMV, but the best girls are the ones that are consistent. If you had a good experience initially and things went downhill after that, I don't think that is someone who will provide decent service often enough. If I like someone enough to see them again, the service and exp. almost always gets better.

I think in regards to dummpy's quagmire, there's not a whole lot that can be done period. If whoever it is that has taken it upon themselves to start a smear campaign knows a little bit about the internet, they can keep coming back here over and over again as someone else from another IP address no matter what measures are taken to try and prevent it. Dummpy, for whatever reason, you have pissed somebody off or become a target for no other reason than you were just there to go after. That's bullshit that it's getting to the point where girls won't see you or are getting vindictive emails for seeing you as a client. What the fuck? You may have to go drastic and create a new identity for yourself on the board and only let those you trust in on who you are/were. It sucks for sure, but the girls have to recreate themselves sometimes, might be getting to the point where you do too.

I quoted your post because there was no mention anywhere by anyone else that I made that particular implication, and you made a point of emboldening it for emphasis. I took the 'quantity over quality' remark for what it was - nothing to do with SP's providing low quality service.

I think another excuse for some new posters would be that if they only have a few posts to their credit, they fear being slammed as a shill. I choose to be low-key myself and don't really see a lot of girls. And there have been a few times where I've had a good experience overall, but there were other extenuating factors where a rec wouldn't be appropriate. I've been with a couple of girls where the initial meeting was obviously very stressful for them and in spite of that, we made a connection from distinct commonalities between us. Now for me to think that only I would be able to get something positive out of them would be wrong but, in varying degrees, neither of them wanted to be an escort. I stayed as a client in both cases, but ultimately they were not looking to continue on as an escort publicly. And another example is that one of them I had amazing sex with, and her orgasms were by far the sexiest thing I had ever seen. Now when I first started seeing her, I told her about CERB and the benefits of getting involved here and that if she was into it, I would write a review. She wasn't...just wanted to keep me and one other guy in her stable, that was enough for her financially. But I thought about how I would go over certain details if I did do a review so that I could be truthful and respectful. She was very pretty, but didn't have the best body, and had lost 60lbs so there were stretch marks and some cellulite. That shit I didn't care about at all - perfect body and perfect skin is nice, but that's not the only ideal of beauty out there. So if I don't mention that in a review, there would likely be some guys disappointed if they saw her, but then again I don't want to talk about her as a thing to be judged out of respect to her. It wasn't as simple as saying she was a BBW because she was not. No matter how confident a girl is about how she looks, reading any commentary about having a "few extra folds" or that someone is focusing on your stretch marks is likely to be somewhat upsetting. And I didn't want to do that. Yeah, there's tactful ways of putting some things, but the point's the same though and will be dissected. Fortunately, it wasn't a decision I had to make, but something else to consider when wondering why a review might not get written...

No implication in my statement anywhere, for the boys or the girls. Just an example of how things might go down. The girls have lives, anything can happen, something came up, got sick...even forgetting appointments. My philosophy is that you have to temper your expectations with having it in the back of your head that if it doesn't work out, don't get too upset about it. And there was no reference to low quality service from SP's in anything I said so I have no idea where that came from. Hell, I've seen great quality service from high volume girls and I wonder how they do it!

Sometimes quantity is good though...well, maybe variety is a better way of saying it ;) I will agree that no matter what the circumstance, getting stood up is a bummer. First time it happened to me, the first thought that came to my mind was, "Great...I can't even pay a girl to come over here!" But again it just goes back to the old adage...shit happens.

Shit happens. If you're that set for having someone over, you try your best to get another SP over. You're probably very fortunate that this hasn't happened to you up until now, especially if you see many different girls once as opposed to a few static regulars. It's not the most professional way of doing things, but there are a few girls that will bail on an appointment that has been set up with a new guy if a regular calls. I've been the new guy jilted with no excuse and the regular that bumped somebody else so it definitely goes on. Totally sucks when it happens to you but, that's life, got to suck it up....

I was wondering who was dredging up a week old thread...yay for retards! If you just would've waited another 46 weeks, it would have been a great b-day surprise....

Love DT. The light and gentle barely touching except with slobber method doesn't do much for me. I don't like a girl pretending to be a pornstar. Ball sucking/licking is always good. What I can't stand is when you're going to cum and she does the HJ finish too rigourously. I like a good shaft thrashing but girls, stay away from the head unless there's a gallon of spit on it. Nothing worse than being in mid-climax and telling her to stop because you're hurting me!

I'm sure the mod will clarify this, but I believe it's more of an appreciative tip. No doubt that many of the girls that use this as one of their advertising venues has benefited from good exposure here, and it would make sense to pay back in kind if you feel comfortable with that. There is some money being made here from adverts and with more traffic coming to the site -perhaps from seeing it on your site - the better it is for being able to market ads. Helps keep the site running. Besides, one added bonus to linking back here is that there are no negative comments allowed. I'm sure that some people may have personal reasons not to link back though and mod seems like the type of person to understand that.

A simple answer is if you're putting it in a bright room or plan on using it like a secondary computer monitor, you should go with LCD. And if you do go the LCD route, 720P vs 1080P is not what you should be concerned about, you should really focus on the refresh rate - make sure it is 120hz. You can get TV's with higher refresh rates, but they're very new and will be overpriced. Having said that, my folks just picked up a 50" LG Plasma at CostCo for under $1000, and the picture is fantastic. Again, the 1080P thing is not going to be that big a deal. HD TV broadcasts are 720P and look unbelievably good on a 50" screen. For 1080P to be visually noticable, you may need to get a screen in the 65"+ range and of course it will only be blu-ray movies that are outputting at a resolution that high. They are making most of the TV's with 1080P now, but if you want to save a few bucks and get a big set for close to $1000, go with a 720P Plasma. Now if you want to spend $2500, go nuts! At that end, you can get almost anything and can't go wrong. Stick with brand names you know to make sure. There are a billion stupid techy factors that are going to be thrown in your face, but go with what looks good to you. And oh yeah...make sure you get a HD box from your cable provider. That's something a lot of people don't do and wonder why their brand new TV showing a standard def feed looks so awful. I've seen people take their TV's back because of that or complain incessantly that the satellite isn't aligned properly. Duh, you need a HD feed ;)

I chose all options. I like clicking boxes...hehe hehe...

I'm not a torrent guy myself, but I'm pretty sure I've seen info somewhere about encrypting torrents so that your ISP doesn't recognize them so they can't throttle them...or something? Didn't pay it any mind though since I usually get what I want through newsgroups. So, seek and you may find ;)

If you have any type of high-speed, there's not much that any of these 'accelerators' will do. I think for the most part, they just tweak some settings in your registry so that your system handles your incoming bits more efficiently. Really depends on what you're doing, how decent/recent your computer is, and the reliability of your connection. I download a ton of stuff directly from newsgroups from a paid subscription, and I can max my connection out at top speed all day if I wanted to. No accelerator is going to make a difference there. Honestly though, if you have a computer made in the last 5 years, with a recent big name browser of any kind, and a high speed connection - something else is slowing you down. Crap running in the background, network congestion, some kind of bug, etc. And it depends on what you you find is coming slow - if you're talking about torrent downloads, well that's a restriction your ISP has put in place to limit traffic for stuff like that and you cant get around it.

I really like blow jobs...but I don't love them. If I'm going to get one, BBBJ is far more preferable and you can do that progression from fooling around to having your little johnny in someone's mouth in a natural way. But I guess I could go without. I said this in another thread but, if I had a choice between a CBJ as part of a 69 OR just a BBBJ with no 69, I'd take the CBJ option without hesitation. And as always, so many variables at play. A great girl, a great connection makes all the difference. I saw one girl like 4 times, she never went down there and I never asked. I went down on her once and that was only after she showered first...was just self conscious about it, said she was like that with anyone. But she was sweet and we had a good time still. But it was tender, gentle sex, not animal driven fluid swapping lust. And sometimes that's what I want.

This just gave me a flash of a potential call from like, a guy from Greece in town on business. Might turn out to be confusing... Greek Client: So, you like a the Greek? SP: No, sorry hun. GC: What's the matter, why you no like a the Greek? SP: Well it's...ew, it's just gross! GC: I put curse on your vagina! SP: That's included - you can call my pussy whatever you want...but just don't call me a cunt... GC: Arg, women in this country are too strange...(click)

We have a new "Who's on first?" for the 21st century ;)

I don't see the need for a fake name, but I have nothing to hide either. I would imagine in some cases you may want to be as secret as possible - guy might be overly paranoid that a SP might shout his name out in public if they ran into each other, or it's part of the thrill to "be" somebody else. Maybe 'Perry' has always found his name unappealing, so for an hour he can be 'Roch' the sexy fuck machine instead. Personally, I don't care much for my own name but I use it willingly, nothing to be afraid of. I don't like it being used during sex EVER. You can call me baby, honey, sweetie, cutie, dude, pussymaster....whatever, just don't throw my name out there. I always hated the thought of it with SO's but never had to deal with it. But I had a SP one time ask me all embarrassed on her 4th or 5th visit what my name was while we were chatting. I didn't take offence that she didn't know it at all, but when she used it during sex....I told her not to do that ever again! I don't know why it bugs me so much, I think it's a bit fake to begin with because me or my SO's never called each other by our names ever anyways. And in that situation where it was obvious it was being thrown in as an 'added bonus', it made everything seem contrived. So take note of that girls, don't use my name! I would rather be told to 'lick the dirty fucking toejam from between my nails you dirty fucking piece of shit' than hear "Oh, Perry!" And that's saying something since I'm not into the being abused thing, nor is my name Perry...

You want an honest interesting thread, make it wide open and ask the guys how much they enjoy being a 'catcher'. My philosophy about that is, if you take it a few times, you'll know what you're doing and what to expect...because you know how it feels. Gives you an appreciation for what she's experiencing and if you think it's good for her, why wouldn't it be good for you? So are you a yes or a no?

I'll take a stab at this and assume it's because they're bigger? ;) Tits have always been like gravy to me, if they're there fine, if not that's cool too. I like the look of a perfectly formed breast (i.e. Anita's a few posts up in her profile pic), but when I'm being intimate with a girl, they're very inconsequential to me. Nice to play with for sure but I can live without 'em...