YoungStud

Goose, You can PM her at Miabella. Cheers, Y.S.

It depends. Some are just fuck buddies. Nothing wrong with that. Sure. Kind of obvious that it would, though, no? Your (and her) choice however. I don't see the two as mutually exclusive, but then, that's just me. Sure. Why don't you start it? If you frame the question really carefully, it could be a great thread. Cheers, Y.S.

Reminds me of a sign one of the guys at work has over his desk: "Are you gullible? Find out for only $10.00." 8-)

Thanks for the asterisk tip, CK! As well, you're absolutely right about there needing to be chemistry between the two women. They really need to have met before and established some kind of rapport, even just over a coffee, or ideally, have an attraction to each other and a level of trust.

Ordinarily, I would say go to the Recommendations section and search on "duo". But that's too short a word for the CERB search engine to handle. As duo combos tend to come and go, best thing is to watch the postings in the Providers Schedules and Ads section for duos or check out the Duos listings on Escorts Canada.

I agree. I never pay for someone to be a friend. But from time to time in this hobby, we may become friends with someone who works in the industry. And decide to spend time with her in different ways. How that's compensated can vary a lot from person to person. Money per occasion, a regular "retainer", gifts, shopping, paying bills, sometimes none of the above, depending on the occasion and circumstances. For example, I've had a LTR/Fav take me out on a social date and pay for both of us. But it's always good to remember what she does for a living and that time spent with you is time that could be spent as "billable hours" with a client. And to be a good friend in that regard. As you say, it's different for everybody. I would never, however, characterize someone spending social time with an escort as "unsavoury".

Kitchener, Ont. ? The Canadian Press Published on Saturday, Dec. 19, 2009 2:25PM EST Last updated on Saturday, Dec. 19, 2009 2:27PM EST A 25-year-old Toronto man is facing several charges after police discovered a brothel inside a Kitchener hotel this week. Waterloo Regional Police say they discovered the bawdy house inside a hotel room Tuesday after receiving a tip that a missing Kitchener woman was seen there. When officers went to the room, they found three women and a man inside. The women ? two from Toronto and one from Kitchener ? were between the ages of 15 and 20. The full Globe and Mail version of the CP story: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/toronto-man-arrested-for-running-brothel/article1406553/

With an LTR/Fav, it could be a meal, shopping, a walk, a event (movie, concert, museum visit etc.) either with sex before or after (or both - lol) or no sex. It's all worked for me, but only with a limited number of EPs. The mutual chemistry has to be there. And then it's all good.

An interesting audio addendum from NPR to my previous posts in this thread. Sexting, teens and child porn: an American view and a bit of a sad cautionary tale. http://www.onthemedia.org/go.py?r=http%3A//www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2009/12/18/03 Cf. Hope Witsell story from NBC Today show: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34236377/ns/today-today_people/

Also note that in the Criminal Code 163.1 (1) In this section, “child pornography” means (a) a photographic, film, video or other visual representation, whether or not it was made by electronic or mechanical means, (i) that shows a person who is or is depicted as being under the age of eighteen years and is engaged in or is depicted as engaged in explicit sexual activity means you could have someone in their 20s in a photo, but if a peace officer, a crown attorney and finally a judge all think they are being depicted as being 17 or younger, there will be a child porn conviction, even though they may be just "pretending" ("depicted as engaged") to be taking part in sexual acts. Interesting to note that while it is legal in Canada for someone between 16 and 18 to have consensual sex with someone in their own peer age group, photos of that act would be child pornography. It could be argued that even photos of clowning around "fake sex" at a teen party would be illegal under 163.1 (1) (a) (i). ("depicted as being") So, if you have or know of teens under 18 who are "fooling around" and taking pictures of same (easy to do with today's technology) or even "faking" photos of "fooling around', make sure they are not posting anything stupid on Facebook, for example. Probably a good idea to do that anyway. But also, it's against the law. Canada's child porn legislation is among the strongest in the world. I remember covering its introduction (dating myself a bit there for a "YoungStud" - lol) and the "controversial" role play by American legal academic and activist Catharine McKinnon, who was consulted by the Canadian government and was one of the driving forces behind the "depicted as being" aspect. Cf. R. v. Butler

What search engine were you using? Google has made a big deal about "doing no evil". They supposedly block child porn from their searches. Kind of surprised this kind of garbage was searchable as easily as it was.

Thanks, 20! I appreciate your sense of fun. A good attitude is what makes this place work.

"wetter than Michael phelps. I stroked it with two fingers and sucked on it like a mosquito except no blood" Love them metaphors, dude! Too cool. And too funny!

Interesting and welcome news for many hobbyists. Not being a particularly big "tot man", preferring a wee tot, overall, in every area, because a satisfying mouthful is always best, in my view, "perky sensitive little ones" certainly work for me. Lol. BTW, for long-time readers of this Board, "slightly better endowed than dummpy" equals average, I think. Lol. But he makes more use of what he has than most of us ever think of doing with ours.

For me, just wanted something distinctive that people would remember. I've mostly worked in media so "good branding" is something of which I'm aware. Lol. Of course, at this stage in my "career", the on-line moniker probably provides an ironically interesting mix of reality, memory and desire. At least for me. Lol. Partly truth (youth? - lol) and partly fiction, to quote a line in a song. But then, life is usually a state of mind. ;-) You be the judge. 8-)

I agree. I've dabbled with several over the years and pretty much gave up quite awhile ago. POF is at least Canadian and free. But all are very high bandwidth for BS. You almost come to feel sorry for the few people who actually seem to be sincere, since they're immersed, whether they know it or not, in such an jungle of game playing and often downright weirdness, they will likely not succeed. And why should the people running them as pay sites care about the quality too much? They collect their monthly fee whether you ever connect or not.

Why only a few recommendations? Because I think a lot of people don't like to get into "lists" or "comparisons" or whatever, because you will always leave some deserving people out and thereby risk hurting their feelings and pissing them off. And who wants to do that to any classy SP? So, in addition to those mentioned, sure, there are a number of classy SPs besides Annessa. Who probably haven't been mentioned here for the reason just noted. Annessa's certainly one of the most popular in that category and all that has been said about her here is true. So, if you start there, you won't be disappointed. Once you do some exploring on your own, I'm sure you'll find others. They're out there.

Congrats Erin. Keep 'em cumming.

In this country, as in many others with a mostly Common Law (Quebec has both a Civil Code and a Common Law tradition, but has graduated penalties as well), there is the principle of graduated penalties. So, in this instance of graduate penalties, the idea is that someone who is an occasional drinker who has too much at the office party one time and who blows .055 will be shocked into never doing it again, and should be treated differently that someone who repeatedly blows .079 but receives the same penalty (over and over again) as the occasional drinker just given as an example. Until the changes in the penalties in Ontario for "blow a warning", the occasional drinker who f--ked up one time had exactly the same "warning" as someone who repeatedly re-offends with many "warnings" - paying about the same amount as someone who parked in the wrong zone and was towed at rush hour. Now, the "repeat warning offender" has graduated reminders about their errors, which one would hope, gets their attention before they go above .08. Just as, even with the most serious crimes, there's a range between slap on the wrist and major penalties. For example, if you are criminally responsibility for someone's death, is it criminal negligence causing death, manslaughter, murder two or one? So, .05 to .08 is a warning which now will be repeated more harshly each time you violate it, not just a repeated slap on the wrist for chronic offenders. If you put all the .05 people in jail, you'd need a lot more jails. The ideas is that the .08 and above offenders are the ones who cause the real damage. The .05 penalties are designed to prevent all the but really stupid or the really addicted from reaching .08 without putting a great strain on the justice system. Remember, in most states south of the border, it's .10, not .08 to be over the limit. So, with serious and graduated warnings now for .05 to .08 and some of North America's most strong penalties for over .08, Ontario is doing pretty good. Sadly, the small percentage who don't give a f--K because of additions or arrogance don't care it it's .01.

Yep. It's all good.

For at least 20 years in Ontario, probably more, there have been legal consequences to being found operating a motor vehicle with more than .05 blood alcohol but less than .08. What changed a few months ago is that those consequences became more serious as well as graduated for repeat offenders. Before, if drivers were found with between .05 and .08 their car was impounded for 12 hours. You could do that over and over again, and all that would happen would be just the 12 hour impound. Perhaps a real warning to anyone with half a brain. But just an Inconvenient slap on the wrist for repeat offenders. Conviction of .08, however, led to a year's suspension, fines, increased insurance costs etc. So, previously, you could have someone repeatedly caught at .079 just getting continued slaps on the wrist and someone one-time at .08 (deservedly), really getting slammed. Since May of this year, the .05 penalties are more severe and graduated for repeat offenses. See the posters in any LCBO. Or on-line: http://news.ontario.ca/mto/en/2009/04/ontarios-new-drinking-and-driving-law.html and http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/April2009/30/c7167.html Some right-wing commentators and defense lawyers don't like it however. See: http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/05/06/matt-gurney-ontario-introduces-new-blood-alcohol-rules-to-punish-the-innocent.aspx MADD naturally disagrees. See: http://www.owensoundsuntimes.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1769758

Keep it up, Wrinkled.

"You are right, sir!" (To quote the late Ed McMahon. Lol.)

Give this guy an award and he goes crazy! Lol.