VedaSloan

Well I'm not your bro, so try to have some class.

I really respectfully disagree. Although the anti-sex work radfems are highly vocal, they are but a small subset of the Canadian population, the majority of whom don't think about prostitution at all. And even at the OCA, while bawdy house provision was struck down, the living off the avails law modified and the communicating law upheld, the decision to uphold the communicating law was not unanimous. Another strike against the prohibitionists is that although they are quite vocal, the judges are not fools. They have in the past two cases recognized the inferiority and flawed nature of anti-sex work "research." Given that the SCC already ruled that the federal government could not close down Insite (North America's only safe injection site), a similar controversial issue, I have a good feeling for the SCC decision on prostitution laws. Plus, this case is important for more than just the laws. It is important that sex workers be heard. This challenge has done more than just challenge the laws, it has brought the issue into the public spotlight and highlighted how damaging the laws are to sex workers. Most people probably never thought about prostitution before, but they will now.

BELGIUM! Brugges is beautiful! I also recommend couchsurfing--you don't pay for accommodation and you get to hang out with cool locals (who also often feed you). http://www.couchsurfing.org

How would the client know he was being turned away due to his race unless she asked and was obvious about it? I turn away lots of clients for various reasons, none of which they usually get to hear about.

Well given that 95% of all prostitution charges are for communicating and disproportionately affect street-based workers and that no clients are dying because of these laws, how the law affects hobbyists is secondary to how the law affects sex workers. And sure, the options are the thread openers choice--except your choices are misleading in terms of the language used and since most people don't really know what is going on, you're just confusing everyone.

CH, I hate to say this, but you really don't know what you're talking about and whenever you post about this subject you put out misleading information. And what YOU think on the matter is largely irrelevant to what sex workers (the people the laws affect the most) have to say on the matter. That's all I will say on this subject. If you really want your poll to be correct regarding prostitution laws and clear, your options should be : 1. Full criminalization 2. Partial criminalization (eg the Swedish Model) 3. Legalization (regulation by the state) 4. Decriminalization. The end. And again, the reason the living off the avails law is a problem is that we don't need it. Exploitative relationships (what you characterize as pimping) is covered by the already extensive laws in the criminal code regarding theft, fraud, kidnapping, extortion and so on. Second, the courts have not defined what is considered "exploitation." Third, it is paternalistic to have laws specifically for sex workers--we're not a special class of people who need special laws, the ones we've got will do just fine thanks.

Well, first off, some of your choices are actually incorrect. Here are your options (and the only potential outcomes from the SCC case): 1. The three criminal code provisions relating to sex work (s. 210, 212 and 213) are upheld a.k.a status quo 2. The three criminal code provisions are struck down (decriminalization). 3. A mix --one law may be upheld, while others struck down (eg. Bawdy house laws and the living off the avails may be struck down while communicating for the purposes of prostitution is upheld). Legalization just confuses things. That's NOT what is happening. Prostitution is already legal. Also, the so-called "pimping" law, in actual effect is far too broad, in that it is applied to ANYONE who takes money from a sex worker, including family members who live with said sex worker. It's also redundant--sex workers don't need special laws just for them--there are already laws on the books that deal with exploitation, fraud, theft, extortion, etc. These links will take you to some excellent PDF infosheets that covers all aspects of the case. The Basics: Decriminalization of Sex Work:http://www.chezstella.org/docs/StellaInfoSheetTheBasic.pdf?PHPSESSID=77cdc8f26c478d98611705756a952397 Sex Work and the Charter: http://www.chezstella.org/docs/StellaInfoSheetCharter.pdf?PHPSESSID=77cdc8f26c478d98611705756a952397 Challenging Prostitution Laws: Bedford v. Canada: http://www.chezstella.org/docs/StellaInfoSheetBedford.pdf?PHPSESSID=77cdc8f26c478d98611705756a952397 I encourage everyone here to read these infosheets thoroughly if you're interested in understanding what is actually happening.

No Siouxsie Sioux? Or The Smiths? WTF people. ;) Happy House by Siouxsie and the Banshees. Alseep by the Smiths https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vy0NySCmuFU

Straight up truth. I do not care what your cock looks like, what size it is, what shape, what colour, hairy or not hairy. Totally don't care. Penetration is usually the last thing on my mind, so yeah couldn't care less. ETA: The only time I care about your cock is if it looks or smells questionable eg. rash/sores/the like

I always tell them to keep their stuff with them, that way if they do happen to lose something, they can't turn around and accuse me of stealing it.

I knocked over a full bag of cat treats and they scattered EVERYWHERE. My cat was losing her shit. I was cleaning them up as fast as she was eating them. I just put them back in the bag, dust and all, because I thought to myself, this is a cat that eats her own puke sometimes, what's a little dirt?

Luxie Isabella Gia Passion Vitto does massage--no idea if she'd do a couples massage or how that'd work, but it can't hurt to ask. I'm Italian, but don't look it. I'm not sure if they do couples, you'll have to ask.

Carrie Moon.

If you can speak Japanese there is a lively market for straight, white males there. I had a friend who worked as an escort in Japan and mostly catered to wealthy big-name Japanese wives whose husbands were frequently busy.

You might find this blog interesting--it's written by a female hobbyist. http://ladyluck-thecompanionista.blogspot.ca/?zx=4be3dfbc9e4e4aa6

This is my baby, Grimlock, or Grim for short.

While I cannot comment on their actual skills (I don't have a penis!), I've heard many good things about these ladies: SexxxyRebecca Cleo Catra Emily J (she does run a Temple of Cock Worship after all) and if you're ever out East, I hear Lexy Grace will blow your mind.

Don't be fooled by men who threaten to "crucify" an SP by writing negative reviews. You don't need reviews to survive in this world. Provide honest service and they'll come back, reviews or not.

Happy Birthday you sexy glamazon!

Your smile (or lack thereof!). A smile when you arrive always sets me at ease.

Don't worry about it! I just cuddle/chat and then we go for round two. If you feel like it, as you mentioned, you can always use those breaks to pleasure your companion.

Bring on the Brits! *swoon*

I will be a resident of Toronto as of August and I have all natural 38 G cups. :)

I'm a proud fat escort, and I didn't find it offensive either!

Eh, farts happen. Apologize, laugh, keep going.