Cato

Outstanding contributions, Pete! Thank you and all the best to you.

Good work, Conquistador! Keep it up! :)

We've been pm'ing back and forth for a bit; I liked her pictures, and the way she presented herself. Smart and sexy. She caught my attention.... I had a one-hour gap, unexpectedly recently, and contacted her. She was free. I was off. Really nice-looking babe opens the door; yes, I'm going to enjoy this! Long reddish hair (I like that ), great toned fit body and nice ass in her ultra tight skirt. Yoga babe, I'm thinking. We get to the room, hug, me feeling her bum as she touches me. Clothes off, off to the shower. I was impressed. I think it showed... Back to the room. I ask her to lie on the massage table, and she does, face down. I get to rub her taut, hot body as she wiggles with enjoyment of my touch. She rolls over, and I continue. I'm liking this. She smiles and laughs and seems to be having fun too. It's a good session. My turn. Veronica is skilful and inventive, changing rhythms and patterns. She's sensitive to what pleases me, and varies her technique accordingly. It's like she reads me. Smart and sexy, as I said. It was a great session and I wished I had longer, but I was glad to have had this opportunity, and I'm very eager for more. Thanks, Veronica! I enjoyed our time together.

Puritans, hypocrites, paternalists.

Our Jazy, who helped inspire this thread, with thanks.

Thanks for these stats, Malika. That's encouraging, at least, that not only will this eventually be shot down by the Supreme Court but that it may not wash politically either. So what's the point? Playing to the hardline conservative base, for one thing, and trying to fix the government's damaged reputation for being 'moral', after the scandals of the past year, the again-in-the-news robocall issue and things like that. But the bill represents a morality most Canadians reject, if Malika's figures are right, and they reject it by a huge majority. It's intrusive, paternalistic, puritanical, bad legislation. And this from a government that killed the long form census on the grounds that it violated people's privacy!

"He has failed on all counts." So well said. Great article, Emily. Thanks.

In part they're playing to their 'core constituency' of social conservatives but this could have very serious and broad implications. I agree that most Canadians don't share these self -righteous puritanical attitudes, but that hasn't stopped this gang before. The law, if it passes, may well be struck down by the Supreme Court, but not before causing a lot of problems.

The Regressive Conservatives. Let's turf them in the next election.

An invitation to visit the social group area on cerb. There's been lots of new posts in many of them, and you will find something you like! :)

Our Sophia, Suite Escapes, just as I remember her. :)

Suite Escapes, Sophia looking awesome!! http://www.cerb.ca/vbulletin/album.php?albumid=9167

Just noticed this. Sorry to see you go. You have contributed much. Thank you.

I have done this a few times and it can be lots of fun, if the chemistry is right. Not all dancers or sp's may be comfortable with this, though.

From RHAG, our redhead social group