Mikeyboy

Love and sex are two very different things. It's easy to judge from the perspective of a single 23 year old, (trust me I was there), but until you walk a mile (or 20 plus years) in someone elses shoes, be careful with the finger pointing ;) . Needs change and so do people. We do what we have to, to get by and live a balanced life, while maintaining balance around us.

When you are in any section, such as the "Escort discussion for Nova Scotia", you can click on the "Search this Forum" icon in the top right corner. Searching the word 'Catalina' gave the following results: http://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=238168&highlight=Catalina http://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=222522&highlight=Catalina http://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=218947&highlight=Catalina Lots of good comments on her here if it is the same lady you are referring to. Hope this helps

I had the opportunity to meet this stunningly beautiful woman yesterday afternoon and I am so happy I did. She is quite tall, and being tall myself, I was in heaven. She has a beautiful face, amazing body, soft smooth skin, and legs for days. At first, she seems to have a sweet innocence about her, but don't let it fool you. She has a naughty side that will make you melt. She has a charming personality and is quite easy to talk to. She very quickly put me at ease, and before long, I was completely lost in her beauty. Time flew by far too quickly. She is only in town a short time, so if you can, treat yourself. You definitely won't regret it. Thank you Chrystal for an amazing afternoon. Until we meet again ;) Mikey

I see where you are coming from, and I'm not trying to criticize, but for me, fake pics are an unforgivable transgression. No grey area at all. You only have a bit of information about the person on the other end of that ad, and to find out that most of it is a lie? For me, that's step one in my "ad filter" process. If pics are stolen, move on. Don't look back. I understand why someone would not want a face pic posted. So don't post one then. It isn't a requirement and most do not choose to post one. I know that there are other reasons a "legit" girl might choose to misrepresent herself, and that it doesn't necessarily mean that it is really a dude with a gun waiting to take my wallet and kidney at the in call location, instead of someone who inexplicably looks like Jessica Alba, (some humor there to make a point;) ), but since the photos that caught my eye in the first place are a lie, then I'm moving on. I now know only one thing for sure about this person, and that is that they are not who they are claiming to be. I've also never heard of a case where someone used photos of someone LESS attractive then they are out of fear that they were too intimidatingly beautiful. I suppose it's possible but is unlikely to be the case. ;) Again, just my opinion and my own screening process, but it has worked well for me so far. I would rather over-screen and miss someone good, than under-screen a face the consequences of that. Stay safe and enjoy! Mikey

I agree. Even if I could get past the obvious environmental disaster of the single use pod, (I read last year that there were already an estimated 6 billion of them in landfills and that was a year ago), I prefer good coffee. I buy mine in whole bean form from a local coffee roaster. I grind it fresh every morning. You can't beat a real cup of fresh brewed coffee.

-Inflatable boat on a lake (daytime) -Grain field -Behind a dumpster. (Not proud of that one but it was the moment. ;) )

She is a member here by the name of Sassyash: http://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/member.php?u=114206 I have not met her myself, but there has already been at least 1 discussion about her here: http://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=235102 Hope this helps!

Good point. I've never heard anyone ask if they knew a good doctor that offered "extras". Hey, I'm already there with no clothes on right? Why not? We could even get medicare to pay for it! I'm sure they wouldn't mind risking their medical license, as well as possible jail time for fraud just so I can get off without having to pay for it myself. Sounds reasonable to me.

I agree as well. The statement is enough to make me move on. I'm not a prude, but the image that statement makes doesn't scream high end experience to me. Probably a preconception on my part, but with so little to go on from an ad, you take the clues given to paint a picture. The picture that one paints for me is not the experience I'm looking for.

Happy Birthday mrnice2! Hope you enjoy your day.

I think that the only ones who would object to cameras are the old school cops who like their power. Honest cops who typically treat people fairly and with respect have nothing to worry about. In fact, it would be a great asset to them in situations where they are being falsely accused of something. It's only the ones who bend the law or use their badge for a power trip that need worry. I think it should be mandatory.

A. They are hot! B. They are relatively rare in this industry. (at least in my small corner of the globe.) Many of us entered the hobby simply for variety. It's the spice of life you know. ;)

Happy Birthday Midnite! I hope you have a wonderful day!

Loosly translated, it means that I may or may not be interested in maybe seeing you at some point, yet I'm too lazy to ask a specific question or even properly introduce myself so I will let you do all of the work. The expected response is for you to go out of your way to convince me that you are worth my time. The correct response is to ignore them until they learn some manners. ;)

I now read it (based on both the original post and the added information about his post from the other site) as being even more ridiculous than that. He seems to believe that we as hobbiests should be obligated to disclose to sp's that we have seen tgirls, and then you as sp's should be obligated to disclose in your ads and communications that you have seen us, in the interest of his safety. This is wrong on so many levels. I mean, first off, we all know of course that ALL tgirls have multiple sti's and that the strait public has none. That's a reasonable assumption right? That ridiculous (and highly prejudicial) assumption aside, does he actually believe that this idea is likely or even possible? I think that it's fairly safe to assume that everyone in this hobby on both sides has a reasonably extensive sexual history. The mathematics involved in keeping track of everyone's complete histories, as well as their partner's histories, their partner's histories, etc, etc are near impossible if you understand the exponential nature of this type of project. Perhaps he should start with his own complete extended history. (Tgirls and all, and yes I bet that they are in there already somewhere by extension). The hobby just doesn't work that way. If you aren't comfortable with the measures you are currently taking to mitigate your risk, then you need to reassess them, change them, or change hobbies.

Sounds to me like he's asking if we as hobbiests should be obligated to identify ourselves if we have seen tgirls. That way he can avoid any sp's we've been with. Sounds like a lot of presumption, misconception and prejudgement to me. Not to mention the fact that if knowing your partners full history is your idea of risk management, than you are in the wrong hobby. It isn't likely to happen here. Nor should it. Discresion is the cornerstone to the hobby.

Stolen pictures are more than a red flag for me. It's a definite no. I don't care what the reason. Lets face it, the first reason the ads even catch our eyes is the photos. If they are a lie then I am not interested. (I have no first hand information on this particular lady by the way. I'm just responding to your comment.) Glad to hear you enjoyed yourself with your first experience, and you certainly seem to understand the importance of doing your homework. (A must in this hobby). Just make sure to trust the results of your hard work. Curious to hear how you make out in your next endeavor. Good luck and enjoy.

http://halifax.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/l-a-n-d-e-a-y/2380450

Does anyone have any info on Katie? http://halifax.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/thick-in-all-the-right-placesin-bedford/2535049 Google says she has advertised in St John's in the past. She is currently in Halifax. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks Guys

I think part of the problem is that new ladies who try this out as an advertising medium often don't fully understand what it is, and conversely what it isn't. They are often used to bp and other similar sites with immediate payoff for placing an ad. Lyla doesn't tend to offer the same instant reward for a single ad, at least from what I observe on the East Coast. Many will try an ad or two, chalk it up to ineffective and move on. The ladies who find this site the most effective in contrast are the ones who engage in the discussions, voice opinions, and become members of the community. They let us get to know them a bit so to speak. This takes time and effort. I think Ottawa in contrast has somehow managed to reach that critical mass that is self sustaining. There are enough ladies advertising that the gents come back and there are enough gents that the ladies get the benefit a bit sooner from the ads. We just have to figure out how to achieve that self sustaining volume in other parts.

You are correct Jane in that there is a lot of name calling and bashing of Donald Trump here. The difference being that everyone who has done so has backed up their opinions with evidence from things that he himself has said or done to make himself deserving (at least in their opinion) of the bashing. You have not done so, and continue to utter the word Bitch in response to anyone questioning your opinion. When you make such strong statements in a "discussion" section on a board, most will assume you are inviting a discussion on the subject and want to talk about the points. You are of course entitled to your opinions, but when you shout them in a forum like this, most will assume you want engagement. I do actually take issue with the word Bitch itself when applied to female politicians. (At least in the manner I assume you mean it, you have not clarified). Hillary is clearly not a kind, maternal person. (Expected female attributes) She even comes off as a bit of a hard ass at times. There is no "male" equivalent to this word, because these are features we tend to revere in our male politicians. You yourself criticized Trudeau for not being enough or a hard ass, and praised Trump and Putin for being so. These same features make a woman a Bitch. If that isn't what you meant, then perhaps some clarification?

Lol . Not a Hillary fan either but certainly the lessor of the 2 evils. How's this for a campaign slogan: "You make not like me, but at least I'm not Trump!"

Welcome PaperWingz. Hope you enjoy this community as much as I do.

That doesn't mean you didn't set yourself up for a lesser experience than you could have had. ;) Maybe not, but it's the type of thing you can never know. A little courtesy will certainly never hurt you, and might possibly even improve your experience. The fact that even some find this approach offensive (and this thread is filled with those who agree if you read through it) is enough of a reason to put in a bit of extra effort for me anyway. Certainly nothing to lose by it.

It all make so much more sense now!