vs_81

I mentioned it in another thread but I guess due to the importance of this ritual in new legal paradigm this deserves it's own thread. Some fifteen years ago Toronto police was doing sting operations against SPs and hobbyists. I happened to be living in Toronto at that time and the SPs there used to have a ritual that convinces both parties that none of them is an LE. At that time it was a normal practice that before transaction of money girl used to ask clients to touch her boobs to make sure both parties are not cops. Neither a female cop would want her boobs to be touched and nor a male cop is allowed to sexually touch on duty. The transaction of money is crime if you find out that other party is a cop without handing over money then you are still safe. I think may be this system of verification needs to be reincarnated again. Remind your provider about that practice before leaving your car and then if you enter the room and the girl asks you to pay money before asking to touch her boobs just leave the room. This way you didn't commit "paying for sex" crime. I personally will demand that with every new provider I see and I would communicate with her in advance and ask whether she is ok with this BTR (boob touching ritual) or not. If she says no I will move on to next provider. Lots of SPs don't demand money until after the session so this is very little thing to demand and SPs should not have any objection for this. After all they want business and if this brings more business why not. I toss the term BTR friendly, if a provider puts it in her ads no need to confirm even before going, will save texting time. What do you guys say?

Wow! What happened to lots if people here? Members on cerb know that I am an East Indian guy and I don't see any racism in seeing "no Indian people" in an escort ad. Intimacy is like a relationship, whether for an hour or five years, whether paid or unpaid, everybody is entitled for personal preference why not escorts. They are human being like anybody and they have their own preferences. Please don't take political correctness too far.

She seemed to be disappeared from this board and BP since 19th of December, not replying pms and neither picking up the phone, might be gone for a sudden vacations. If anybody has any info about her please pm me.Regards, L.

Melissa doesn't have olive skin, I have met her once, she might be East African but she is not what I have been looking for.

Wondering anybody heard or know anything about the return of Ottawa's famous Mia Bella, she went on a summer vacation that has lasted more than a year and a half already and still no signs of reappearing. Please update the thread if you know anything, even if someone can confirm that she is retired forever or not.

While I have my eyes on her I would prefer someone in her 20s. Thanks for the suggestion.

I love olive skin and that's why I love middle eastern/ meditaranean girls, being tall and curvy is a plus. Can anybody recommend or point me to any provider of such type. Thanks! For the help.

I toftt and it was excellent, she is a great find, curvy body (150 pounds approx) tall girl (5.8" approx), loves kissing, daty, dfk, bbbj, mpos, msog all included in a decent price. Check her out before she goes back to Montreal. Pictures are real but might be little older cause she looks curvier than her pics and I love her body the way she is, I don't like thin girls. She was very interactive and participative in all positions which is important for me. Her bbbj skills were excellent too and she is not a clock watcher, she has a tanned skin and a great laugh.

Ok, now I know where the misunderstandings arises, what I meant to say is "in a sugar baby situation you have to pay too much because she is completely dependent on one person but in this case she would still be working as an SP and making money so she is [not] completely dependent on you" so my sentence should be read like this: " you don't have to pay too much in this situation instead of sugardaddy situation because [in sugar daddy ] she is completely dependent on you. Sorry for not putting things very clearly.

Wow wow wow, this is very offensive, not because your opinion is wrong but because you based it on assumptions, which are completely false. Where did you get the impression that I wanted to exploit someone and take advantage of their situation. Instead I thanked someone for giving me this angle of thoughts that it would become a no-choice situation for that SP. I even mentioned that i was thinking that this way i may be helping someone to provide roof on her head. you wrote "I thought at first that he'd missed that coercive element of the relationship. But then it turned out that he was specifically interested in her dependence upon him, because of the leverage it gave him over the terms of her service." Where did you derive that from. Go back and read my posts carefully before making assumptions and then accusing someone based on your assumptions. I am also shocked by the fact that some people nominated this post without actually noticing that this poster is accusing someone falsely. Go and read my post before answering this one.

That's a very good point thanks for mentioning that, I was thinking that in this way I would be helping somebody to have a roof on her head but obviously what you said is true too. Thanks everybody for their suggestions and good advices.

I totally agree, if you go to any sugar daddy site you will recognize many ladies who are current or former SPs and this arrangement is very common in that kind of relationship. You cannot dictate the sex life of your sugar baby so why not make an SP your sugar baby knowing that she wouldn't be using your apartment for work and you don't have to pay too much cause she is completely dependent on you.

Without offending anybody I just want to mention that the agreement would dictate the SP not to work from my apartment so I don't see any reason for above concern.

Can't I make it a part of the deal that she will have at least one session a week with me or the contract would be void. Just trying to find ways around all the assumptions:)

Like I said I don't live there so technically it is not "living with a man". She could tolerate my hobbying activities more than anybody else because she herself is in this line of business. Anybody who doesn't like hobbying will not be happy sharing condo with me.