Megan'sTouch

I think this is a great idea but I would not recommend doing it as a surprise. You could create a very uncomfortable situation for her or the SP. Just some friendly advice. You're a sweet friend to do this for her! :) I'd recommend looking into Annessa.

Partners of sex workers are rejected on the CBS questionnaire.

I'd answer this question but it could give away my identity. :(

I'm looking for an alarm clock on my phone that will not only beep, but give me a message. Eg. it beeps at 1:30pm and says "Call John Doe". Does such an app exist?

If you are engaging in unprotected sex with multiple partners (or where your partner has multiple partners) does it really matter whether you paid for it or not?

Thanks WIT! I failed to notice this was outside Canada. Posted via Mobile Device

My understanding (and correct me if I'm wrong) is that men who have paid for sex are banned for donating for 12 months. Interesting, people who've had sex with a sex worker in the last 12 months (eg. boyfriends, husbands) also appear to be banned from donating. They ask the question "In the last 6 months, have you had sex with someone whose sexual history you do not know?" I assume if you answer yes, you are barred. This doesn't make sense to me. If I sleep with someone who is a total manwhore, and I know he is a manwhore, is that okay because I know it? I'll be honest, the riskiest (unprotected) sex I've engaged in I did for free and it will not disqualify me from donating. The safest sex I've had has been for pay and disqualifies me from donating. No amount of money will get me to take a condom off. (Okay, well maybe 100 million and then I'd fund research to cure all STD's and STI's lolz). I think it's absolutely insane that CBS doesn't seem to recognize the difference between protected and unprotected sex and the fact that one is much riskier than the other!!

This article doesn't sense at all. The title says he was charged with prostitution, but doesn't specify what charge (solicitation? bawdy house?). Then when you read the article, it actually looks like he committed sexual assault.

I'm sure all the victims would want a fact-based methodology for screening donors rather than a myth-based methodology. There are a lot of dangers in a myth-based methodology, including a false sense of security. The current system also allows higher-risk people to screen in, while disqualifying lower-risk people. This is not conducive to stopping the spread of HIV/AIDS. I'm also positive that the families of people needing life-saving blood would want a fact-based methodology that protects their loved ones, and also allows for safe donors to donate. We need people to donate to save lives, and I'm out!

They ask men if they have had sex with a man since 1977 and if the answer is yes, he is not permitted to donate. (I understand this is under review). The questionnaire also asks if you've had sex in exchange for money or drugs since 1977. Does anyone know if everyone who answers yes is barred from donating? http://www.blood.ca/CentreApps/Internet/UW_V502_MainEngine.nsf/resources/Eligibility/$file/ROD2011-05-01.pdf If so, this makes me angry. Even though I'm against the ban on MSM donating, I understand that MSM are a group that is at high-risk of HIV/AIDS. There is absolutely no evidence that sex workers are more prone to HIV/AIDS or any other STD/STI. How can Canadian Blood Services make policies that are myth-based rather than fact-based??? Oh, and since when is HIV transmitted on money???

This may seem controversial but I'm going to say it anyways....... There are a lot of racist stereotypes in porn and the sex industry such as the "primitive" Black man with the huge swingin' dick, and the submissive, young Asian (often a schoolgirl). For the record, I'm not saying that every man who is attracted to Asian women is into the submissive schoolgirl thing, just that based on porn, it seems to be a common fetish.

You gals are making me jealous!! ;) hehe

There is nothing wrong or offensive about asking a lady what her boundaries are, if they are not posted in her ad. Communication makes for a great encounter! I would suggest asking before booking the encounter or at the beginning instead of in the heat of the moment. I personally don't allow kissing. I'm way too prone to colds and flus. But I still feel able to get up close and personal within my boundaries.

I actually danced with a woman who had a "V" and it was neat!!

It's not a surprise to me at all. For us (sex workers) most of us are younger and most of our clients are older. That's just a fact. Most of us recognize that trends in pubic hair have varied and because many of our clients are from a different generation, they prefer hair. That doesn't surprise or puzzle me. But it's not going to change the way I groom myself which is my personal preference.

I'm not sure where you get that from??? What makes you think that we think that 90-95% of guys prefer shaved???

ottawaadventurer - Thank you for your post. I have firm little titties and I prefer no body hair, and I am 100% woman. I'll be honest that it hurts a bit when people suggest I'm less than a woman or girl-like. I also don't understand why some people feel it's necessary to insult other body types in order to "justify" their own. Variety is the spice of life and beauty comes in all shapes and sizes.

It shouldn't be a surprise that 90-95% of service providers strive to appeal to the majority. It's kind of like voting. You don't get proportional representation and a lesser majority is strengthened.

Maybe ask her what she would like?

Was she helping them or exploiting vulnerable teens for profit? It's really hard to tell.

Suck it up, Princess. Posted via Mobile Device

I'd take a humble, respectful, unattractive gentleman over a cocky Brad Pitt anyday!

I like warming up hands during a lapdance :)

Yup. I guess I don't have to point out which intervenor group it was..... lol.

For interest sake, when I was at the court of appeals, the lawyers of the intervenors referred to Pickton's farm as a "bawdy house" that should have been shut down on bawdy house charges.