roamingguy

Justice Department sure cleared that one up Remember an English teacher saying when defining a word don't use the word you are trying to define in the definition. He would follow with "a dog is a dog" That doesn't define what a dog is In this case, a sexual service is a service that is sexual Dumb question for the Justice Department. If you engage in a non sexual act that gives sexual gratification OR a engage in a sexual act but received no gratification from it is does that mean it is no longer legally a sexual service. AND who determines if you received sexual gratification...some justice department lawyer? This confusion has me so frustrated I need to see a companion :-) Even more frustrated since I'm rambling without a full first cup of coffee :-) RG

Dinner for two last night at the Keg in Kingston RG

From smalltown Ontario I see ladies primarily in Toronto, then Ottawa, London, Niagara Falls ,Hamilton and oh since I'm posting this in a hotel room in Kingston Ont the morning after a wonderful date, Kingston Ont too :-) RG

Just out of the shower a few minutes ago Hearts just a pounding away now, weak in the knees BTW a good thing, if I didn't feel this way I would hang up my hat so to speak Have a dinner date at 5pm with a special lady, Goddess and most of all Friend Then after dinner we're coming back to my hotel to sit, hold hands and watch a G Rated movie ;-) RG

I'm meeting someone special tonight RG

Sitting in a train station waiting for my train to arrive RG

Oh I knew you were joking about the macho thing. But I'd rather snuggle with a lady than be a macho man any day Not that's there anything wrong with that ;-) RG

My signature says it all...I like cuddling As part of a date, not the sole reason for it though. I like kissing and hugging too, but would not want to have a date just kissing and hugging And, well without spelling everything out (now) I like a date in it's entirety, drinks, dinner, conversation,----------cuddling, well everything. Seeing a lady is not just about one thing,jmho It's about a complete interaction with another person A rambling RG

Caller ID Spoofing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caller_ID_spoofing Have you used Canada411 or similar look-ups on the internet to look up each number? Sounds fishy to me RG

Happy Birthday Sasha Enjoy your special day RG

Symptomatic of the CPC's attitude towards the electorate, not to mention their contempt of the SCC and Charter of Rights. Sona probably saw a Cabinet post as a reward...not 9 months behind bars. He didn't IMO do this on his own

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/11/19/robocalls_exconservative_staffer_michael_sona_learns_his_fate_today.html

It was the seeing her at her place that was illegal But the actual act of prostitution itself was not If the lady saw you at your place that was legal And I do agree that since the ladies were trusted before, and they can be trusted now RG

Happy Birthday sweetshay Enjoy your special day RG

What was illegal under the old laws? Prostitution was a legal activity. Certain activities surrounding prostitution were illegal, but prostitution itself was legal And the activities could take place perfectly legally in the past within certain parameters. Such as she meets you at your place, not you at hers. Now not the case Concerns, if there were truly any, about outing, might be because a client did not want his family to find out, his workplace to know, if a politician, could cause a scandal. But why would LE have cared, the core activity, prostitution was legal I do agree, the ladies could be trusted before, and they can now. A rambling RG

Emails and browsing here too :-) RG

Finished doing the dishes (not many) Gave Nabob a treat...his favourite Haagen Dazs dulce de leche ice cream And while he's in heaven in the kitchen I'm surfing CERB and watching the movie Stalingrad RG

Probably just the same type of guys who object to being screened/verified. And they believe their privacy is most important. More important than a lady's safety and security RG

Ladies would no more do that to their clients than clients would do so to the companions they see...generally speaking And me thinks the threat made of being outed by Terri Jean Bedford was when (btw not justifying, but trying to understand) she was treated badly during hearings and ousted. Her threat was less a threat (I'm guessing, don't know for fact) against her former clients as a whole, as it was against clients who may be politicians (maybe cabinet ministers) supportive of this legislation publically while in private practicing what they preach against (is that making sense) Clients have nothing to fear, ladies respect their confidentiality. Besides, nothing except a handshake, watching some tv, discussing great works of literature, maybe dinner out at the most, that's all that takes place. No special hugging takes place god forbid LOL A rambling RG

A bottle of wine RG

Happy Birthday Yabut Enjoy your special day RG

Happy Birthday Reuben Sandwich Enjoy your special day RG

I happen to go to Toronto so my two cents Back when I worked, Saturday evening was the best for me Now that I'm retired, everyday is Saturday LOL My preference is for the airport (Dixon/Airport Road side). It is easier to get to IMHO. Second a general observation, hotels are more expensive downtown than by the airport. Third I have yet to pay for parking at an airport hotel (and I have stayed at a few different hotels) but downtown hotels, parking runs about $40 night And the hotels by the airport, besides less expensive, seem to have larger rooms (or suites) every bit as nice if not more than a downtown hotel Anyhow my two cents RG

Papillon RG

Thinking of what loftier pursuits I can pursue now that the CPC has made me seen the error of my ways Maybe Lyla should have a book review section...read a work of philosophy or Classics, or great works of literature and do a book report On second thought trash that idea... Signed Still A Wayward RG