roamingguy

Bacon & Tomato Sandwich on pumpernickel bread Washed down with water Mixed berries for desert RG

I know a serious subject, not minimizing it, but a little humour RG

Perhaps before criticizing Trudeau and his invoking the War Measures Act, lets not forget that was a direct response to the kidnapping of James Cross and kidnapping/murder of Pierre Laporte by the FLQ. This was an escalation in violence by the FLQ. Just my opinion, but the invoking of the War Measures Act probably stopped the FLQ from continuing to escalate and may have in fact saved lives. And as for the Night Of The Long Knives, the real Night Of The Long Knives, that was when Hitler and the Nazis carried out "political" murders so Hitler could come to power What happened with Quebec during the repatriation of the Constitution, well hardly rises to the level of political murder. Trudeau didn't murder Rene Levesque. There was a balancing act between the Feds and ALL ten provinces and that requires give and take on every provinces and the feds part. Quebec just wanted to take and no give. And as much as I despise Harper and the CPC and they won't get my vote, lets not forget, it's the parliamentary system that allows for the Prime Minister to have the authority he does. But dictatorial, well anyone thinking that might want to live in a regime like Stalin's Soviet Union or Hitler's Germany or Idi Amin's Uganda or Pol Pot's Cambodia or Muammar Gaddafi's Libya or the Iran, both under the Shah and Khomeini or...well you get the idea. Harper, well any PM in Canada's Parliamentary system doesn't deserve to be considered a dictator. Yes he can push through legislation, even bad, but he can be voted out, legislation can be challenged in the court because we have the Rule Of Law. Can't say that of real dictatorships can we. A quick few ramblings RG

Same as for lunch, a small salad...still full from Saturday night's dinner RG

Well I'm not a massage guy but I did have a great massage from Megan (Megan's Touch) and would recommend her. Oh wait, I did, when I saw her when she toured to Kingston http://www.cerb.ca/vbulletin/showthread.php?ltr=M&t=44037 and here is Megan's Profile http://www.cerb.ca/vbulletin/member.php?u=28987 RG

Agree they should be re-tested every year. But what they do, at least in Ontario is a joke. It's every two years, and a written test only. But a written test doesn't test reflexes, awareness and so on. My mother passes the written test but should have her licence pulled. She's run reds, stop signs, illegal left turns, she doesn't focus on the road but looks at the "scenery" like buildings around her and then the car drifts into oncoming traffic. I absolutely won't be in the same vehicle when she drives and keep expecting a phone call, "your mother has been in an accident..." Her doctor should have her licence yanked RG

True but how would anyone but Genevieve and the voter know? And once in the ballot box, which ballot gets removed Don't consider it illegal, consider it civil disobedience...well civil disobedience with a happy ending LOL RG

Really it's more a Highlight Of The Weekend...and that was a, well a romantic weekend escape with Emily Rushton. I had a wonderful time with this special lady and friend My recommenation to be forthcoming in the next few days Thanks Em for spending the weekend with me...it was definitely memorable and perfect RG

This is the WRONG SITE and WRONG LIFESTYLE to engage in if you are looking for a relationship/wife/SO. This is about NO STRINGS ATTACHED companionship only If you want to conventionally date, join LavaLife, eHarmony, Plenty of Fish etc Ladies will be scared away from you if they think you are looking for an SO BTW this is not about stereotypes. The ladies offer no strings attached companionship. The gentlemen are looking for no strings attached companionship. This is a mutually beneficial arrangement and that is what CERB and this lifestyle are about RG

Happy Birthday mygirljenni Enjoy your special day RG

Happy Birthday Mark Have a great day RG

Salad with bleu cheese dressing, prime rib with the trimmings but what makes it so special is my dinner date, Emily Rushton RG

Congratulations Meaghan on 2000 post milestone Looking forward to your next 2000 contributions RG

Congratulations on 8000 posts Cato Looking forward to your next 8000 contributions RG

Waking up with Emily Rushton in bed beside me Thats the highlight of the day...so far I still have a full day and a half to spend with Em :-) RG

Counting down to hours now...for the knock on my hotel room door and a weekend escape/sleepover begins My heart's just pounding away, anticipation building..but its all good RG

I thought there was another thread on this subject. Very informative thread, and Cat's guidelines are a real good starting point http://www.cerb.ca/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=97946 RG

Something else about ladies who I repeat with. Yes we are more friends, not SP/Client. And we have for lack of a better phrase, shared memories, memories that continue to grow each time we see each other. But that lady doesn't fit me into her schedule. If I suggest we go out for a date, and have a specific place and time she, because she knows me, juggles her schedule (where possible) Likewise sometimes a juggling of hours is requested by the lady and because she is a friend, I'm happy to do so. What is nice about repeating with a friend, the same woman, is the comfort level between us that allows for example requests like that. And it doesn't diminish our encounters at all. In fact it makes them all the more special, if that makes sense RG

Seems I was left behind so Indecent Proposal And for K Killer Elite (the 2011 movie) RG

The idea of such a list only feeds into the negative stereotypes that "mainstream" society has of this lifestyle. This is a lifestyle where gentlemen get to have encounters with professional companions. Part of being professional is being discrete. Even if the ladies had such a list, the ladies, well the ladies I know, are too professional to out their clients. The relationships made between client and SP are built on a foundation of mutual trust, respect integrity, and discretion. Kinda humorous talking about such a list, but no, I don't see any such list existing. Although as I earlier said, don't we all wish at a minor teeny weeny level, if there was such a list it had Harper's, MacKay's and Joy Smith's name on it. But back to reality :-) One more thing thrown in for thought. How many here would think it's appropriate to publically "out" a lady (if you knew her real name)if your encounter wasn't one hundred percent in your opinion. No gentleman would. This is a discrete, anonymous mutually beneficial lifestyle all the way around. And violating that trust, save for safety, no matter the rationale, is not justifiable IMHO A morning rambling RG

Here is a thread on the question you asked http://www.cerb.ca/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=10326&highlight=subjects RG

Additional Comments:

I can see it now, Peter MacKay's reference, Joy Smith LOL RG :-)

Don't know about it, and yes, a bad idea. Companions do make their living in large part on being discrete But isn't there just a little part of us wishing Harper and MacKay are on this "list" and maybe also hoping Joy Smith was "lonely" one night and saw a male escort for company:icon_twisted: But out of fantasyland, and back to reality, it really is bad idea, the thin edge of the wedge. If a lady ceases to be discrete if she is seeing politicians, who else is she indiscrete with. Not worth lowering yourself to a politician's level...hope they remember that A rambling RG

I purchased, oh hell can't say here, it's for this weekend's sleepover ;-) RG :-)