roamingguy

Kenora, Ont RG

Utica, New York RG

Salem, Massachusetts RG

Heart-Barracuda RG

From msn.com http://tech.ca.msn.com/hundreds-of-thousands-may-lose-internet-in-july RG

Kid Rock and Sheryl Crow-Picture RG

Boy, with all these posts about monkeys, it's beginning to shock the monkey Peter Gabriel-Shock The Monkey http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DngPCSxAorc&feature=fvst RG

Nashville, Tennessee First thing that popped into my head RG

Speaking for me, and only me, it's because I'm not in a relationship (by choice) that I seek the companionship of ladies in this lifestyle And when I see ladies, it doesn't matter to me if they are in a relationship or not. The ladies are doing this as their livelihood, they aren't cheating on their spouses. And any issue between them and their spouse is between them and their spouse only. As much as the ladies provide,(and I guess I'm blessed with the ladies I've seen) a good or great GFE, I know that it is because they are paid companions. It isn't a conventional date, they aren't my girlfriends, it is at the core, an SP/Client relationship. And nothing wrong with that. It saves complications, no strings and no drama If a lady had me thinking about her with feelings I would do nothing. If she truly has feelings for you, she'll let you know. If she doesn't, she is a great SP, but not your future wife LOL A rambling probably going nowhere RG

Edward Bear-Last Song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd5UJLlsO_E&feature=related RG

Xai Xai, Mozambique And yes, I confess, I had to use Google for this one LOL RG

Guess I've been pretty blessed with the ladies I've seen. Only four bad encounters since embarking on this lifestyle in July 2010. These are very abridged versions Deal Breaker 1. Three hour encounter, after first hour she asked (and I said yes) if she could go downstairs to the hotel parking lot to have a cigarette. She left, never came back. Not upset by the money being ripped off, but by not having an encounter that evening Deal Breaker 2. Planned encounter for month and half. She shows up, says it's her time of the month, we can do everything but fs. Then she says, exact words "gotta pay the bills hun, gotta pay the bills" Deal Breaker 3. I was late, due to 401 closed, getting to appointment. I did phone the lady let her know. When I arrived at the parking lot, I called to confirm the condo number...she shouted (yes shouted) on the phone, threatening to blacklist me to all Toronto SP's if I didn't show up in 5 minutes. I showed up, it was an encounter I just didn't enjoy whatsoever Deal Breaker 4. Nobody's fault really, just no chemistry. I got a feeling though that she was going through with the encounter because she was short of money But for all the other encounters, I've met great ladies. And that is why I still partake in this lifestyle RG

I think any lady who has a bad date uses the SP Only Section to warn the other ladies about. A good date, well she would tell another lady if another lady the guy plans to see required verification including a reference. The man could contact her to see if she would in fact provide a reference for him. As for the ladies discussing the gentlemen, who knows (besides the ladies of course) what is discussed on the SP Only Section...it is their section after all My two cents RG

Does that mean that here come the monkees http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMKZ5rUk7UI&feature=fvst By the Monkees no less RG

Happy Birthday Rachelle Enjoy your special day RG

If your in the kitchen it's probably because you Eat It...food that is Weird Al Yankovic-Eat It RG

Orleans-Dance With Me RG

Maybe it's been a long long long time since I was last in Church (I'm agnostic). I was surprised at the jeans and tshirts but maybe the sign of the times But the real shocker, and I still consider inappropriate, wearing the skin tight short dresses, showing cleavage (and not just a little), more like they were going out clubbing And these weren't teenager, they were ladies in their twenties and thirties. You may not agree with organized religion, or a church, or it means nothing to you...but it means something to others. When walking into a Church, you still show respect. I'm completely agnostic, but I don't disrespect the Church because I don't believe in their faith A rambling RG

is this inappropriate. First off I'm not a church goer at all...been years, lots of years ago, but today had to go to church, first communion for my nephew...apparently a real big deal in the Catholic Church When I was raised, going to church, you dressed up in your proverbial "Sunday Best" Today, I go, dressed in my Sunday best. Not only do I see many many members of the congregation in jeans and a tshirt but what was even more shocking, and I'm no prude, but some ladies wearing tight dresses, showing cleavage (one breasts almost falling out of the dress), and some, very short in length. It would be considered indiscrete for a lady going to an outcall at some guy's hotel to walk through the lobby dressed the way these women were...just finding it shocking that they were dressed, more like they were going out clubbing than going to church Like I said, I'm no prude, but there is a time and place for everything and this clothing worn didn't seem appropriate for church IMHO Mind you this is coming from a guy who thinks it's rude to wear a hat at the dinner table or a restaurant, but see many do it now RG

Lakefield Ontario, just north of Peterborough, and on the shores of Katchewanooka Lake, a lake I've caught a bass or two, or three, four or five out of RG

And we never realized until now what a rough life a cat has RG

Speaking for me, and only me, when it comes to booking an encounter, yes, it may be in some cases the photos that would cause me to initiate contact (after I've read her posts, profile and website prior to contact ) but if the posts, website, any emails we exchanged don't generate any interest (I don't think we'd click) then I won't book an encounter. Definitely with repeat encounters, it is much much more than her looks that keep me interested and want to repeat with her A rambling RG

A friend and fishing buddy, who died from a heart attack seven years ago Still miss him, still miss going out fishing with him I know, not a celebrity, but he's a friend from my past RG

I like BRM even though he is dead wrong about Lee being a better fisherman than me, and he forgot (inadvertently) about Porthos And I like Porthos, a positive contributer to CERB, enjoy reading his posts There, we're back on track, I think RG

I'm going to say no. If a man and woman have consensual rough sex because they both like it, it doesn't mean either one of them are cold or standoffish. Likewise, take the stereotypical Don Juan type of man. Wants to have sex with a woman, one night stand, promises her the moon and stars. He's a passionate lover at night, next morning leaves her. He got what he wanted, had to lie to do it, but all he cared about was his gratification. The lady is left brokenhearted next day thinking she had found the man of her dreams. Wouldn't consider him a kind man, irrespective of being passionate lover Or how about a SP who's can provide the gamment of services from gfe to pse to dabbling in bdsm, that doesn't define her character or personality, just the services she can provide. A person who is kind and caring, has character and integrity can enjoy rough sex A person who is mean and cold can be a passionate lover And all points in between A person's sexual preference(s), IMHO is just his/her sexual preference(s) nothing more, nothing less Just my opinion RG