futileresistenz

Thank-you for the question, Ice4Fun. I don't know, maybe it is not really that important. I am not paranoid, nor subscribe to conspiracy theories, but I think privacy is something that does not get enough attention and its merits are wholly undervalued. Mod at some point changed the servers to handle a secure communication method, and with the changes in the legal arena, and the new sensitivity of the communications we transact on this site, I personally think that having that option is a bonus. Certainly if it just requires a very simple setup. As opposed to making it a cakewalk for hackers, corporations, governments -- or who have you-- to easily be able to read (in clear-text, i.e. unencrypted) all our posts and potentially intercept the articles and threads we read. Other members here may not give much heed or thought, or fret about it, one way or the other.

Directed to mod (but I know he's very busy), and geeky types that concern themselves with such things: This is not a huge deal -- more of an FYI --, but I'm noticing of late that there still seem to be quite a number of links that break an established secure connection, specifically search result links. That renders the rest of one's session insecure until you notice the missing https: in the location bar. I've tried using the HTTPS Everywhere add-on, but had issues with this site that I didn't resolve, so ended up not using it here. Could at least the search result links be fixed, mod, or is this hard to do? Is there a viable work-around? Thanks for your time and attention. FR

Nice to see a new member joining our community. It just happens to be your birthday, also, sinful12345, so on behalf of the friendly folks here, I wish you a very happy day and that you find many new friends here. If you haven't done so already, please check out this thread and follow the link to the Rules and FAQ section. Have a question? We're here to help! The New to this thread, or the search function are fantastic tools to find THE answer you're looking for among the 1,384,792 already answered. (Totally made that number up!) Anyway, enjoy your day and get comfy here! FR

One companion in my fantasy constellation has to be Ms. Emilly (Rushton), and I would go with someone she has a great rapport with, suggesting Miss Lane or the lovely Keissy, but open to ideas. That would be hot and spicy and sure to turn up the heat a notch or two. hehe And the best thing about this is that it is something that actually could happen. :D [ Not to leave anyone out, I could pretty easily think of many such potential dream pairs. ]

Ice4Fun is right. Today being the unofficial start of summer, we have a great season of many visiting, extremely reputable companions planning their schedules to make the trip to our wonderful province. The decision for some to make a first (or a return) trip to NL will depend on many factors, but I would think not in a small way on word out that we are gentlemen that respect them and can be relied upon to follow through on our booking. Even 1-2 no-show clients per visit can make or break a trip, as the time, effort, and costs to come all the way here is not insignificant. I stand corrected, but believe that to be the case. Breaking a pledged commitment by no-showing or cancelling for unserious reasons is not doing yourself a favour and frankly just plain douche-y. Respect yourself by showing them respect. Of course this applies generally and not just to Newfoundland and Labrador, and includes non-touring locals as well. Remember, this is a business, and if there is no profit to be had, it will gladly stay put or go elsewhere - just not to NL. Support the ladies when and as often as you can. If we treat these lovely ladies right, they will keep returning and maybe even spread the good word among their friends that coming here to NL is a great idea, with the great weather and tourist attractions that we have to offer in the best months ahead. Thank-you for your attention. Now go have some fun! FR

Aww, Nicole, I feel for you. I'd be so mad, too! Thanks for the little chuckles, though, I *do* hope you got it all out! :) Ticked about people who can't (or don't) read and don't give a crap about doing the littlest thing in their interactions and initial contacts. Treating people, yes lovely PEOPLE like this in such a disrespectful way... *facepalm* Please don't take this too seriously, either. Had to have a mini-vent, too, but the intended audience doesn't take heed and didn't read it anyway. :D

Cheese, milk and bread. :)

To answer those direct questions, as for me, ideally I'd prefer to discuss it in email prior, but as that is kind of out the window, at the start of the meeting (if necessary at all, as it may not be) is best. Extra emphasis on consent from a male POV is not needed - JMO.

What!? Into the 12th post and Roamingguy hasn't weighed in twice yet? (Just teasing, RG :P ) Great discussion so far, btw... Thank-you so much, Traci, for starting this interesting thread. I've wanted to do it myself for sometime, but never seemed to be able to frame it properly. This is my opening! Thanks for that tea video, also, emb3750. It will be useful in more than one way. I'll try to be brief... *winks* Consent is paramount in my opinion, regardless whether in normal relationships, or here. It goes hand-in-hand with respect for another person, whether it be your partner for life, or for a night. Hopefully you are emotionally invested enough to care what your partner feels and desires, and that they are willing participants in any and all activities that occur. It is not a given that everyone thinks and plays by that standard, however. I think the recent exposure of this topic in the public sphere, brought on by the many quite high-profile tea-drinking scandals, is a good development. It is very much needed, whether there is a sea-change or watershed moment in attitude shift will remain to be seen. By some accounts, the 'new' metric of 'enthusiastic consent' muddles previous guidelines, some say the gradation of consent in this way is a feminist plot to label all tea-sipping activity as 'tea ritual violence' (something I think preposterous). I regard this apparently new standard to be better, and really have always abided by it, it is a matter of being in tune with the other on a new level. True, I may have missed out on beating the record for 'closing lucrative tea deals' (shudder), but spending intimate time with a lovely lady, regardless of whether it just happens to be talking, laughing, cuddling, breaking out the Earl Grey, or any number of other fun 'shenanigans' ;), has always brightened my days, anyway. Just my 0.02 FR

The term open-minded plays into the fantasy that advertisers using it are more experienced and therefore more comfortable offering a wider variety of options and activities, from couples, to accommodating fetishes, etc. This is not necessarily true, however, at minimum it should mean that any topic of concern, any desire one might like to explore, can be broached with the provider in a tolerant and understanding environment, without being judged for having that particular bent. Far more than not, I believe that to be the case. Beyond that, the term is used too widely to be useful as a predictor of outcomes, the correlation may be fairly non-germane. What matters today, as before, is still communication, communication, and communication. What it definitely does NOT mean is that personal safety boundaries can be negotiated away with someone that claims to have an attitude more "open to suggestion". Dangerous or undesirable activities can still be discussed without judgment, but it is still at the discretion of the provider whether a particular activity will be permitted. A segment of the client population will always try to get maximum mileage and I don't purport to be able to change their behaviour or to speak for anyone else. If you do the proper research, as has been outlined in many forums on this board, and look for a provider that appeals to you by looks, body type, style of advertising (or whatever factors it is for you), and you get that initial chemistry on contact , then you're likely to have a very satisfying experience, regardless of any specific terms used. Just my nickle's worth.

Welcome, Brooklyn. I can't say it any better than Phaedrus already has. Have fun here!

I'd also like to extend a hearty welcome to Tori and Charlotte and any others who might pass by here for the first time. There's an immense amount of information to be found here, alone in the 'New to this? ...' forum, you just need to browse a little. Enjoy chatting with new mates or discussing issues in the friendly and supportive community forums. I'm not aware of a similar board that is so positive where respect towards each other is the rule and civility the norm. By all means, find the things and activities that interest you the most. Joining in is optional, but it makes it more fun. ;) There's something here for everyone! FR

Happy Birthday, Sweetshay, I hope you have a wonderful day. All the best in your new year of life!

Congratulations on your impressive 3K milestone, Christine! We are lucky to have you among us. Your passionate spirit, dedication, wisdom and courage to see things as they are shine like a beacon in and for the community. Keep up the great work and have fun in all you do. FR

Thanks, Mod, for your tireless efforts jumping through hoops to keep this great site available for us during this transition. It's well-appreciated. Just one question - and I hate to bring it up: Are secure connections working for other folks? Since Wednesday night, I haven't been successful, no matter what I do. Cleared cache, cookies, history, used two browsers - no go! PMs also welcome. Thanks in advance, FR Additional Comments: P.S. Besides the above and the dots, everything looks peachy around here. :biggrin: Kudos again!

A grower, usually. On some occasions, the grower-lovers can delight in multiple shows - an Alternator ;-) haha Additional Comments: Great topic, btw. Lots o' laughs!

That'd be too much fun entirely! (j/k) I doubt that will happen now in any case. To all that may pass by here... When I'm stumped by a term, I realize I'm looking for the definition of an acronym. So simply googling* the word 'acronym' plus the term I'm looking for, which will restrict matches to likely sites that define a shit-ton of acronyms - including the one I'm searching for, works like a charm! * If you think the term might pertain to a particularly immoral or offensive concept, let's say, for argument's sake involving sheep or other farm animals, you might want to be more circumspect and use the more secure and non-invasive Ixquick.com or DuckDuckGo instead. Hope that helps (good thread here anyway)

A fine job, Raven! Congratulations!

Happy birthday to a very lovely lady! Wishing you a great day, and indeed, a great birthday week! All the best for the upcoming year, Savannah! FR

Sitting pretty at 12 here. Woot! Lowest/best score yet! :-) I think I'm the same age as RG. Might just be an early life shielded from much of pop culture and TV. Thanks for the fun quiz, RG.

Additional Comments: Additional Comments:

For me it's The Pretenders' rendition of Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas. Chrissie's voice on that one gives me goose-bumps every time.

Q is for a needy, wanton QUICKIE!