Ryan1967

Yes, the membership fees are different...BC is 5$ for a lifetime membership and I think CMJ is 70$ when you first join (technically it is 200$ and your first 30 minute session, of 130$ ivalue s included...so 200-130 = 70) and I have been told is is $10/yr thereafter.

Thanks for your thoughtful reply Meaghan, that makes more sense. For what it's worth, terb members will routinely call out other members for inappropriate posts, crude language, and I personally have never experienced anything violent or dangerous...but my experienece is limited to the Ottawa forums and subforums so certainly not a far reaching conclusion across the entire board.

While I agree with the last part of your last sentence...not sure I am completely following your logic in this post. Are you suggesting that all members of the male gender take responsibility for the actions of others? That seems a bit broad and sweeping. I strongly condemn domestic violence of any kind, but I don't take responsibility if someone beats their wife, if I am a bystander to violence I will intervene, but to help a victim, not to take responsibility for the actions of others. By your logic should all men be incarcerated because there are some wife beaters amongst us?

Went there last night as I had been curious for months and I finally had a free Friday night. They allow single guys on Friday, it was not a special night as Malika described, everyone seemed to know everyone (regulars) so for your first time and you go alone, prepare to be pretty disappointed. Not much action happening and a lot of voyeurs.

Everything said about Stacy Star is accurate, I saw her for an MA session which was toe curlingly fabulous. She is sensual, sweet and an absolute pleasure to hang out with. Her MA rates are very reasonable, highly recommended!

From a client perspective, as long as the original ad is very clear of the timeframe for the discount (e.g "special discount today, March 31st only") then totally fine to honour the ad wording and not offer the discount on a different day. If the ad does not mention anything about timeframe then I would feel that the quoted rate does not have an expiry date, even if the ad is removed it will be cached from several "scraping" sites.

Concur with this recommendation, Penny is a wonderfully sensual woman, our hour together wizzed by and I cannot wait to see her again. She is gorgeous to look and, has a perfect spinner body and conversation flowed effortlessly. She really is a gem

I won't try to answer all of the questions...but a couple I think I can provide some explanation (my opinion of course). As for clients saying that the session was great and then not reco'ing, I think it is probably safe to assume that they are not telling the truth. Most guys (probably women also) are not comfortable providing negative feedback in person, so even if the session was not great will probably say "that was great and I look forward to seeing you again"...even if they have no intention. Agree that the correct thing to do would be to say nothing in that situation, but I think most people want to say it was great even if they think otherwise. Has a client ever said at the conclusion of a session "you know, that was quite ordinary and I don't think I will ever see you again", I would imagine very few would have that intestinal fortitude even though that could be what they are thinking. The other one I was going to comment on is the make arrangements then go radio silent and no show. This is a sad reality on both sides of this industry, I know there are clients that do this and companions also. Unfortunately there are inconsiderate people out there and the anonymity of this business allows both clients and companions to be inconsiderate with some amount of immunity. Best we can do as clients is share with each other which companions do this and for companions the best you can do is share with each other which clients do this (presumably in the Companion only area).

She is featured in Cowboy Kenny's diary today.

Email communication will not be any safer under the new law: This enactment amends the Criminal Code to, among other things, (a) create an offence that prohibits purchasing sexual services or communicating in any place for that purpose;

I am obviously not making myself clear...blood borne pathogens are the usually the most deadly/nasty...so yes, I am concerned about those...I hope everyone is. Performing daty on a woman who is not on her cycle carries virtually no risk of contracting any of those, unless under extreme circumstances. I had (incorrectly) assumed that most providers would not work for 4 days out of 28, but as many have stated, there could be longer periods of spotting and work is often a necessity. Working during the cycle changes the risk profile from the baseline, seems pretty obvious to me. I disagree, it is not a red herring agree that the OP was grossed out by the blood, but the dialog has evolved into a health risk, which I think is genuine, you can choose to disagree with me. wow...conclusion jump much?

Some pathogens (HIV, Hepatitis, etc.) are only transmitted by blood. For those, the risks are definitely higher for both parties during menstruation. It is not that black and white...Hobbiests that research risks understand the risks of daty, I have yet to see a table that shows daty both during and not during menstrual cycles and the relative risks. On top of that, there are some that feel that there should not be any disclosure of the cycle, so now the hobbiest is being asked to assume that all SP are always on their cycle. Put that altogether...I'm out of this hobby.

On this point...we agree! I have not commented on how the OP handled it, which I concur was not acceptable, but I think there are things to be learned, and agree or disagree...I think this thread has served a good purpose (putting the OP and the situation to the side). neither did I... I never mentioned enjoyment, you inferred that it is performed out of commercial necessity which is what I was commenting on, don't twist my words either!

Thanks Gabriella...I did not quote originally, but I was referring to Cat's post: Daty is performed for the client, not the provider Which I believe is where the generalization began. I am relieved to hear that some providers may actually enjoy this activity.

Thanks for ruining daty for me... :). I am joking of course (partly), but I did not realize that most SP's have no interest in that activity whatsoever and do it mostly due to market demand, thanks for enlightening me. I do understand that you are interested in promoting the use of dental dams as I seem to remember other threads where that drum had been banged before. As for having cake and eating it too...you are obviously entitled to your perspective, but I see it a bit differently. If risk is changed from the baseline (which you admitted that a menstrual cycle does) a provider has a choice to accept the risk and hope nothing goes wrong or disclose the situation to their clients (or of course not work on those days). I would of course prefer the latter and you seem to prefer the former. I see the latter as open and honest communcation, whereas you seem to prefer a "datyer beware" approach. As I said earlier in this thread...this has been useful and educational.