Gia Wren Marlowe

Hello! My name is Gia. I am an established independent companion who provides engaging and evocative experiences for men, women and couples. I will be in Toronto from April 28th to 30th for a few select dinner or lunch encounters. I would also be delighted to offer duos with Malika Fantasy while I am in town. In appearance, I am a slim, toned hourglass with full breasts, pronounced hips and a small waist. I have silky black hair, and soft alabaster skin. My face has a cute and pretty look, with blue eyes and full pink lips. I have an open and amiable nature that tends toward the candid and contemplative. I also have a mischievous and playful side that prevents me from taking life, or myself, too seriously. I place a strong emphasis on providing a complete experience, and I take the time to make sure the small details add up to an amazing whole. I love creating stimulating and exciting experiences for both of us, and I hope to make our time together thoroughly engaging. I enjoy discussing a great variety of topics, both high and low brow. I especially light up during thoughtful discussions about our interests and personal philosophies. I am able to meet you at your hotel, or host our time together at a beautiful suite in Liberty Village. Please visit my website to learn more.

Hello! My name is Gia Wren Marlowe. I am an established independent companion who provides engaging and evocative experiences for men, women and couples in Ottawa. In appearance, I am a slim, toned hourglass with full breasts, pronounced hips and a small waist. I have silky black hair, and soft alabaster skin. My face has a cute and pretty look, with blue eyes and full pink lips. I have an open and amiable nature that tends toward the candid and contemplative. I also have a mischievous and playful side that prevents me from taking life, or myself, too seriously. I place a strong emphasis on providing a complete experience, and I take the time to make sure the small details add up to an amazing whole. I love creating stimulating and exciting experiences for both of us, and I hope to make our time together thoroughly engaging. I enjoy discussing a great variety of topics, both high and low brow. I especially light up during thoughtful discussions about our interests and personal philosophies. To add an interesting twist to our encounter, I am happy to offer duos with Malika Fantasy when she is in Ottawa. Her next visit will be March 25th to 27th. I am able to meet you at your hotel, or host our time together at my beautiful little suite down town. Please visit my website to learn more.

Even good reviews can contain lies and embellishments. Some people use a review to boast or just to write their own fantasies. The reviewer is not always intent on describing what actually happened. Don't take anyone's word about what a provider offers but the provider's own. Don't assume that anything you read - good or bad - reflects anyone's actual experience. Reviews can be taken under consideration when seeing someone, but personally, I don't think they should be a deciding factor. They are too unreliable.

Hello Lyla! I'm happy to tell you that my friend Malika will be back in Ottawa from February 18th to the morning of the 23rd. I'm looking forward to getting together and having some fun with her. Would you like to join us? I also have a new duo partner who is based in Ottawa. My friend Nova and I started offering Massage duos in the new year. We have been friends for a while and I'm really excited to have her as a partner. While we both offer companionship, our duos are strictly massage at this point. Learn more about my duo partners: http://malika-fantasy.com/ http://novarella.com/ A little more about me... I am an established independent companion who provides engaging and evocative experiences for men, women and couples in Ottawa. In appearance, I am a slim, toned hourglass with full breasts, pronounced hips and a small waist. I have silky black hair, and soft alabaster skin. My face has a cute and pretty look, with blue eyes and full pink lips. I have an open and amiable nature that tends toward the candid and contemplative. I also have a mischievous and playful side that prevents me from taking life, or myself, too seriously. I place a strong emphasis on providing a complete experience, and I take the time to make sure the small details add up to an amazing whole. I love creating stimulating and exciting experiences for both of us, and I hope to make our time together thoroughly engaging. I enjoy discussing a great variety of topics, both high and low brow. I especially light up during thoughtful discussions about our interests and personal philosophies. I am able to meet you at your hotel, or host our time together at my beautiful little suite down town. Please visit my website to learn more.

Hello, my name is Gia. I am an established independent companion who provides engaging and evocative experiences for men, women and couples in Ottawa. In appearance, I am a slim, toned hourglass with full breasts, pronounced hips and a small waist. I have silky black hair, and soft alabaster skin. My personality is open and amiable, and I have a nature that tends toward the candid and contemplative. I also have a mischievous and playful side that prevents me from taking life, or myself, too seriously. I place a strong emphasis on providing a complete experience, and I take the time to make sure the small details add up to an amazing whole. I love creating stimulating and exciting experiences for both of us, and I hope to make our time together thoroughly engaging. I enjoy discussing a great variety of topics, both high and low brow. I especially light up during thoughtful discussions about our interests and personal philosophies. To add an interesting twist to our encounter, I am happy to offer duos with Malika Fantasy in Ottawa and Toronto. I am able to meet you at your hotel, or host our time together at my beautiful little suite down town. Please visit my website to learn more.

Hello! My name is Gia. I am an established independent companion who provides engaging and evocative experiences for men, women and couples in Ottawa. In appearance, I am a slim, toned hourglass with full breasts, pronounced hips and a small waist. I have glossy black hair, and very pale, snow white skin. My personality is open and amiable, and I have a nature that tends toward the candid and contemplative. Thankfully there is also a mischievous and playful side to me that prevents me from taking life, or myself, too seriously. I place a strong emphasis on providing a complete experience, and I take the time to make sure the small details add up to an amazing whole. I love creating stimulating and exciting experiences for both of us, and I hope to make our time together thoroughly engaging. I enjoy discussing a great variety of topics, both high and low brow. I especially light up during thoughtful discussions about our interests and personal philosophies. To add an interesting twist to our encounter, I am happy to offer duos with Malika Fantasy in Ottawa and Toronto. Malika will be in town December 3rd to 5th. I am able to meet you at your hotel, or host our time together at my beautiful little suite down town. Please visit my website to learn more. Warm Regards, Gia

Further to Cat's point, I think they would also list any agency worker as someone they believe to be "controlled", so keep that in mind. Not everyone with an agent or a manager is coerced. I also love how the young people that legitimately are rescued through completely different operations are always lumped in with these pointless interviews. I'm sure it is done deliberately to try to make it look like these initiatives are more effective than they are. A short correction a few days later is better than nothing, but most people reading the story the first day will never see that. The police and/or media is clearly using a bit of propaganda there. It's frustrating.

They probably made the first reading very extreme in the hopes of losing less in re-writings. This would never pass constitutional muster.

I just want to point out quickly that some people are allergic to coconut oil. I don't believe there is a known allergy when it comes to eating it, but contact dermatitis is something that a rare few will experience. If you are thinking about using it, try it out as a lotion for a few days and see how your skin reacts. My skin does NOT handle it well, and because of that I would never want to use it as a lube. I actually have to read beauty product ingredients carefully to make sure there is no coconut oil in anything I put on my skin. So while it is amazing for some people, just give it a trial run before you commit to buying a lot.

@GiaWren :)

Twitter is huge for sex worker activism. It's one of the few places where we can get our voices heard by a larger public. There is also a lot of propaganda being tweeted constantly by abolitionists and without escorts online to counter them I worry about how their misinformation will spread. Yes, we can make non-escort accounts to fight them, but I don't think that would be as effective as hearing from self-proclaimed escorts themselves. If we have to hide our profession to use twitter it isn't as helpful.

There is currently a petition going around to impose this same filter in Canada. I imagine it will also impact escort sites. If it goes through it looks like clients who want to view our sites will have to contact their internet service provider to opt in to seeing porn and adult-related websites. They can just say they want to look at porn, now and then, but it will make an awkward and likely guilt-ridden conversation with a significant other, indeed. I see a lot of other problems with this proposal, but first and foremost I do wonder how it will impact business, and client's lives.

Actually, as much as everyone is saying "Duh", without looking at how people view men, I don't think this study has proven anything. Do people look at men's faces or bodies more? Why assume it is only women who are looked at this way? They've done other studies to show that men are assessed on their height and the width of their shoulders, so perhaps a similar study with men would show that we're not really looking at their faces, either.

Nathalie Lefebvre and I offer duos. We do nuru duos, as well.

I am not resorting to emotional appeals nor inflammatory statements to win an argument. How very, very dismissive and condescending of you to say so. If you are not able to understand my points, that is fine. But do NOT assign me motivations. I explained things exactly as I see them, and obviously I am not the only one who sees things that way. I tried to keep the points at which we disagree civil, but you obviously have no interest in that. I have put myself out there where I would be better off staying silent to protect my business interests, because I thought it was worthwhile to have all points of view on the table. If your only response to my posts is to say that I am just wrong, and that I am making light of consent, then I will not bother trying to have a reasoned debate with you in future. There are more positive ways I can spend my time.

I don't believe I misinterpreted anything. There was a discussion about legal contracts and going before judges. So I did not draw my argument from nothing. I agree that no one has suggested that anyone be forced to perform sexual acts -- no one on here, anyway -- but if you set up financial consequences for failing to perform them then there is a sense of potential punishment hanging over the head of the provider. I don't see any way around that. Especially with things that are so difficult to quantify, such as the depth of a deep french kiss. Rephrasing things to say, basically, that she isn't losing money, he's just gaining money back, doesn't change the fact that the provider has lost income because a client feels he didn't receive what he thought was agreed upon. So I think my word choices have been correct. There can be a difference between what is intended and what is. To say that no one intends to coerce providers (I'm not trying to throw the word at anyone, but it's the one of the words under discussion) is not the same as saying that the provider doesn't reasonably think that she will be punished for not giving the client what he wants -- even when she finds it is not feasible once they meet (ymmv due to hygiene, etc). I don't believe the word contract, especially as is being discussed by some -- a legal contract -- should apply to a sexual encounter. I do not agree to specific acts in advance, so in my case it's moot, but I do think that even where services are discussed it should be understood and accepted that the services may vary. I used the term "rapey-vibe" because that is exactly how it feels to me. I can't change that that is how it feels to me. I don't like to ever hear of anyone being under contract to perform certain acts, or to make restitution if they don't. I actually don't think people should promise specific things in the first place, though. Because I do think one should deliver on one's promises and I think that where we might not be able to, we shouldn't promise. But the thing is, that's not that easy for a lot of providers, because many clients HATE it when you seem to be coy about what you offer. There do seem to be providers who would be willing to alter the fee structure a bit if something comes up, and, again, I think that is the right thing to do. I am uncomfortable with it being a sort of codified, by contract, thing, though, because I think there is too much room for potential abuse. I think it creates a more frightening and negative environment for providers, without offering much to clients as these things are hard to prove, anyway. My whole point is that it's unworkable. I think it would be nice to be able to call up any provider and get what is promised without worrying about being ripped off. I just can't see a workable solution. If it's a matter of "What is right?" Then a legitimately aggrieved client should get some form of recompense. I'm against trying to enforce what is technically right for the reasons I've stated. Too tough to prove, too much room for misuse. I can't take back the terms I've used because as some men have pointed out, there are two sides to everything. It may suck to hear that this is how it sounds to some of us when people talk about contracts, but if you want real opinions, then it's good to be aware that this IS how it sounds to some people. Some clients feel that things are too much in favour of SPs all the time. We may or may not agree, but saying the opinions sound yucky doesn't do any good. I'm not sure any of us will change anyone's mind on this matter, and I'm not out to offend anyone or make any feel that they are being treated to a condescending lecture. It's a bit draining for me to try to convey something controversial and likely to be unpopular with many on a forum where anything I say may effect my business. But since the involvement of the ladies side of things is one of the advantages of this board, I thought I would add my viewpoint. In any case, I am not looking for a fight over this, and I don't want to repeat my points ad nauseam, so if anyone has further issues with my posts, I may just agree to disagree.

I think this has been brought up before, although perhaps it was on another thread, but you cannot have any legal contract that forces a person to perform a sexual act, or that punishes him or her for failing to perform that act. There are other rights that take precedence over contract law. So in terms of talking about a legal contract that can be enforced, I don't believe there can be one. In terms of compensation made to the client if a discussed act was not performed, I think that is fair if the provider agrees that the decision not to offer the service was not the fault of the client. I think it is a matter of reputation and professionalism on the part of the provider that is in her best interest. I also think that most clients are good people who don't deserve to go in with understandable expectations and then feel that they were deliberately misled and swindled. But I also think that the SP in question is the one best able to determine whether or not delivery of services was reasonable under the circumstances. I don't think forcing her to prove, somehow, to some kind of enforcement agency that she couldn't reasonably be expected to perform the act is possible. Putting someone in the position where they have to prove the impossible (how can she prove he was rude, or not clean?), or face punishment of some kind (financial, in this case) would leave a sense that a provider must do what sexual acts she's told or else. Especially when most contracts are apparently verbal. How does she prove she didn't agree to what he says she did? I assume the onus would be on him, but hopefully you see what I am aiming at. Talking about enforcing contracts leaves a lot of room for abuse and intimidation. Even if the contract is written (in emails, for example), in terms of enforcing that, how does a client prove that he did, in fact, have impeccable hygiene, or that he did not act offensively toward the provider? He's not any better able to prove his side of things than she is. As other's have pointed out, even if it were a contract enforcible by law, which I believe it isn't, there is so much he said/she said that I don't see any way to make a fair decision. And in terms of the decision, if a woman promises uncovered oral over the phone, and then declines during the encounter, what would one sue for? A $20 refund? $10 000 for mental anguish, including loss of self esteem? Again, I don't think potential punishment should hang over the head of a woman you are asking to perform sexual services for you. I understand that legal contracts were brought up to point out that there should be some protection for the client when contracting services, or simply out of curiously for how it would play out given the changing laws. But I am very, very uncomfortable with talk of enFORCING that sexual services be delivered. I do wish there were a way, other than doing a lot of research (I understand that sometimes anyone might want to make an impulse purchase of services with a feeling of safety) that would give clients some kind of guarantee that their money will be well-spent and their encounter will unfold as they hope. But whenever I look at punishing someone for not delivering sexual services it just gets a bit of a rapey vibe for me. Weighing the loss of money vs coercion to perform sexual acts, I find the loss on money is less bad. And I hold to that even as a client, since I sometimes see female MAs myself. I completely understand that clients feel they are always left without sympathy or recourse, so I hope this post hasn't sounded confrontational or, I don't know, lecturing. I'm just trying to show that the idea of having an enforcible contract in practice is not really workable.

I use Crown Skinless Condoms because I did a lot of research and read a lot of reviews to find the best condoms (and lube) that I could. That is what I came up with and they have worked well for me. You can't find them at the drug store, unfortunately, but you can order them online or buy them at Venus Envy, I think. For larger sizes I use Magnum Ultra thin or Extra thin - whatever the thin ones are called. I have tried One condoms as well, because I like the wrappers, and I have found them to be very good and durable, too. I can't vouch for the level of sensation it leaves for men but they seem to be good. But the large size (Legend) is not always large enough.

I'm not sure how reliable the results are relating the the fields the men work in. The men surveyed were all on ashleymaddison, correct? So most of those fields seem to be male-dominated. It may be that men in other fields are more likely to be cheating with co-workers than going online to find an affair. I suspect men in other occupations actually cheat at around the same rate.

For you: If you search for Daniel Craig under google images, google will helpfully suggest "Daniel Craig body?" hehehe

A personal favourite:

The Beat and the Pulse, Austra http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emHAfLWqbnA They are a Toronto band, I believe. You can get their albums on itunes. I was introduced to them and this song in particular by somebody awesome.