piano8950

I like it if the limits are posted. Usually makes for a shorter list, and easier to determine what's on the table

I'm sure some ladies would appreciate this, but I think this thread is for pictures of people with penises

Okay, I'll say it. Lasting 4 minutes is much more satisfying now.

Yeah, I've been guilty on this. Considering some of the recent threads that popped up (one in particular), I think a few members might want to read this rule again.

I would very much like if Toronto could become big here. The two big cities of Ontario well represented. Been trying to recommend Cerb to people here, especially the ladies I've met but to little success :( But I'll keep trying

A stylus is a pen shape object to use on the screen of your phone. So instead of tapping with your finger, you're using that pen. Allows for more precision, and if kinda neat to draw stuff. Some apps also have handwriting recognition, but it's not completely precise. So you could use a stylus to write as you would with a pen, but based on my experience, I'm more of a button guy. It might be worth trying out the stylus in a telus store

Inspired by your other thread Happy Birthday!

Three Irishmen walk out of a bar Courtesy of my old Irish roommate

I haven't seen it much here, but on other erb websites, I've seen a lot of ads specifying "No Blacks, no east Indians". There is a reputation that these two races have certain unsavory characteristics (Not everyone of them, but a larger percentage compared to other groups). Whether it's true or not, I have no idea. On one occasion, despite having no comment regarding this on her website or her ad, I found out about an SP's no Blacks/No EI clients rule after she sent me an email asking for my background. After I told her (I'm EI), she cancelled, and that was that. It was a bit humiliating, but the best way forward is to forget and move on to someone who is willing to see you. All of the most amazing women I've met do not have this exclusion requirement, and I'm sure you'll find someone that meets your interest.

I'm still trying to figure out how these two: She's got no recommendation post; Does not affect any of my decision. [FOR THE LADIES] Recommendation has help me in my path. Have the highest votes at the same time. It would seem that one contradicts the other

I just assumed when that happens that most of the people who normally leave reviews have already done so. And every so often, the odd guy might write up another review. I don't think a gap in reviews after a flurry in the beginning is any indication of something wrong.

Like Il Re said, you'll have a lot more luck with responses if you post here: http://www.cerb.ca/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=54 On to your questions (And congrats on your upcoming anniversary) Of the top of my mind, I can't think of anyone who does offer this service. I know that there are ladies who do see couples, just check here: http://www.cerb.ca/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=315 and look at their ads and websites. I don't think I could do justice to this question since I've always visited a lady solo. I don't know what her approach would be with a couple, but if I were to guess, you can expect to have a good time. Let her guide you two. Just remember a few simple guidelines to make it all better. - Pay her as soon as possible. Before the festivities begin - Be clean, and keep in mind scents. While you two may be used to each other's perfumes and colognes, she may react strongly to it. - Be very polite, it'll just make things easier - Be clear with your expectations. If you want a certain kind of ending (oral/fs) let her know well in advance (in the email part of contact). She may not provide that service. That goes for any other sort of requirements you have. This is something you can clarify with her directly. Paint a picture of what you're looking for, it might help her a lot. Tips are never expected and but always appreciated - common response on the subject. I've tipped from $10-$40. For Christmas season once, I got her a bottle of Wine (a certain type that she said she likes, some ladies have a certain part of their website dedicated to special considerations, should you wish to do so). Ask away!

This appeals to the photographer in me Landscapes made of bodies....very well built bodies. The Cave of Abdo-men Twin Peaks Desert of backs More here: http://petapixel.com/2013/07/29/bodyscapes-creating-landscape-photos-with-the-human-body/

If this: Is in reference to this: I threw out a number to be intentionally vague because I don't want anyone assuming anything about an SP here, and let them make up their own minds. I have decided what that point is for myself. My only advice to newcomers is to read the recommendation section themselves. I don't want to upset anyone, and the only reason I brought it up was in the context of this thread. But I think my comments are bringing this thread off-topic a bit (three people mentioned it, and I went ahead and responded all three times :P), so feel free to bring up another thread on the topic so this one doesn't get derailed. I think Areez has said it better than my four attempts.

The thing is, that I just have no impression. This being a luxury, I don't want to spend $300+ on something that I don't know what I'm getting into. This goes for everything that I spend money on, if I can't determine what to expect, I don't go for it. I understand that there are men out there that have this sort of attitude. One of the other erbs, half the reviews read like a Penthouse submissions. But despite their positive undertones (client basically liked the time spent), that sort of recommendation is not allowed here (from my understanding). Cerb has an environment that is much different in nature from the other boards. I put a lot of value in recommendations. I would not be here if reviews did not exist. There are men and ladies who don't put too much importance in it, but there are people IMHO, like me, who do. "If at first you don't succeed, try try again". I wasn't here a couple of years ago when that happened, but instead of dismissing the rationale behind it, maybe change the approach. Learn from what went wrong last time to make it better this time. But only if this is something that the Cerb community wants in general. From the posts here, I have a feeling that I'm somewhat alone in wanting negative reviews allowed in some fashion. And if that's the general consensus, I'll go with it. It is, some of what the ladies have brought up sound very alien to me. But it does expose different points of view, some that can be eye-opening.

Last one for a bit, I think I'm being spammy now Heard this once while tied up. Can't begin to say how f-ing hot she said it, and how I felt after hearing it.

This one exists, so it must be true!

Flowers, jewelry, ballet tickets, etc

I know a few, but those are the religious hypocritical types. But to take an example of a porn actress, there have been a few stories of female teachers being fired for their other 'inappropriate' profession. Never mind that it had nothing to do with teaching children Math or the ABCs. I'd like to think that Canada is more progressive, but I believe the last iteration of this story came from a Montreal school (I have to confirm this). And the sad part is that at least schools are brutally honest. Corporations can claim a different reason and go about their merry way. I'm hoping that in the private job market, things are much better, but who knows?

I agree with you completely. The lack of recommendations does not indicate that you're a bad SP. From your posts, to be honest, I've always imagined you as the opposite. But when I mean a long time, I meant much longer then 2 months. I'm not looking for pages of recommendations, just something that gives me a confident feeling seeing an SP. There is one that I've seen here for a while, (over a year or two based on her post history), but she has perhaps less then 10 recommendations. I honestly don't know what to make of it. She doesn't post here often, and does not have any website with additional information. There might be many reasons for her low recommendation count that has nothing to do with bad experiences. But I can't be sure. I have taken a chance on a lady who had a no-review policy, but only because of her involvement online, and thankfully it did not backfire. I once saw a lady with glowing reviews, with a couple of negative feedbacks (on a different erb), and found that the experience to my disappointment was more like the latter. I gave her one more shot because it seemed based on the negative reviews I probably met her during a bad time or something. The second experience was much better. With an allowance of negative reviews, I'm more comfortable to see someone even if she has 1 or 2 recommendations. But like I said in my previous post, there has to be extremely strict rules on that front. I understand the fear that ladies have with negative reviews. And frankly, spam reviews, or ones done maliciously are harmful to everyone (ladies more so), but clients too, who would lose out on potentially great experiences. I wouldn't even mind that if a review was negative in nature, it went through a vetting process by a council before it was made public. But to be specifically clear, I do not support the free-for all review policies on the other erbs. I do not want to see that sort of system here. And given the choice between this method, and the current Cerb, I prefer the Cerb way. I've thrown out simple ideas that may or may not work. But if it does come about, I'd like a system that ladies can be comfortable with. Frankly, I'd want the system to be setup in such a way to expose those women who are putting a bad name to the profession, and highlighting those women who go above and beyond.

If your pictures were taken when this camera was new, you need to update your album

I'd love to be helped. Seems so...50s and my mind is telling me it's wrong and unequal, but it sounds fantastic. But seeing her get dressed, I probably don't give off that vibe. I go in complete hands off mode. Even if she's completely naked, my eyes are always on hers, and not an inch lower. Once during an outcall, after all was done and we had spent 3 glorious very clothes free hours with each other, she got dressed. She then had some adjustment stuff with her panties, and took them right off, and since she was already wearing all her clothes, I immediately turned around so she could have a bit of privacy and not feel uncomfortable. She was so nonchalant about it, it was hot.

A city as liberal as NYC has an issue with one of it's candidates sending a penis picture to some lady. Nevermind it has nothing to do with his leadership skills, his value as a politician or anything of that matter. OMFG! THAT'S A PENIS!! That show is very deceptive. On one of my trips back to Canada, I came to realize how little information these people actually have. It's more on instinct and guess work. The best thing is a confident demeanor, a pleasant smile, patience/tolerance for rudeness, and common sense. Without going into too many details, I know someone who works across the border frequently without the right papers. Has her website with her face, and her intentions and her name. Nothing. It's just not feasible for border control to background check everyone. Going back to the face pictures, I've always wondered that myself. I've seen one SP with her face pictures, the rest of them did not have one, and I would've seen the one with a face picture even if it wasn't available. So there you go. I do wonder if they decide to do something later on in life, are they worried about the repercussions? (if any)

The threat/fear of having my information leaked is my biggest concern. There are no circumstances that I would volunteer my personal information for the privilege of a second tier status along with it's associated perks. And here's why: Personal information online have been stolen from much more secure databases. I'm sure the owners/administrators of this website use standard if not extremely secure methods to ensure privacy of Cerb's existing users. But so do many websites who have been successfully hacked. Comparing Cerb to SP411 or other services of this sort is in no way a relief, it's a non-issue. Just because they have not been compromised, it does not mean that it theoretically cannot happen. I have no issue sharing my name and other personal information to an SP that I see, but to share it on a database is completely out of the question. If this was a requirement to simply use Cerb, I'd deactivate my account and go on happily with my life. On to the review section - Honestly, I was dead set against the idea at first, but even in one of the crudest boards I've seen, I noticed a certain rejection of unfair, out of left field criticisms. I am supportive of the idea of a membership level that is open to the ability to leave negative reviews, but I'll get to the specifics of that membership below. Over time I've set up one policy to live by when looking for an SP -How many recommendations does she have, and how long has she been in the business? With a no negative review policy, I decided against seeing a certain SP because of her lack of many recommendations (Despite being in the industry for a while). I could not determine why she had so few, and to basically keep safe, I elected not to see her. With a review instead of a recommendation policy, if she had no negative reviews, I would be much more confident in calling her. Now I just want it clear that an acceptance to a negative review policy is not an acceptance to bashing. There are some legitimate concerns that clients have, and not all ladies treat this with the same level of professionalism that others do. I do not support a ratings (looks/boobs/ass/etc) sort of system. A negative review would in my mind go like this: Call the SP, was very hard to book with/ did not show up. OR Met the SP, looked disinterested/ was not engaging OR Even a simple, based on my experience, I would not recommend/will not be seeing her again. Something along these lines. I do not want to vilify someone even if she did provide an exceptionally terrible service. Now onto Second Tier Memberships Frankly, I don't support the pay to review idea. I understand the verification part, but there are other methods of doing so. From my understanding, to get into the SP only area, a referral is needed by another SP already inside. I like this idea, and I don't see why an SP referral to verified status isn't good enough? Referrals are already used by some SPs to date check someone. And even if personal information was not required for the negative reviews bit, I honestly don't feel the need to pay for that. I just wouldn't bother in the first place. Just because I've paid a sum doesn't mean that my opinion is worth more. I'd imagine that someone out on a rampage might go the extra mile and pay for the second tier membership just to write a negative review. But awarding that second tier status for free and extremely selectively gives the review section much more credence. An SP (or perhaps more) were involved in giving a particular member the ability to do so. He has a tag attached to his posts saying he's a verified member. He leaves a positive review, and other potential clients can see that. If and when he does leave a negative review, since an SP or more than one vouched for him, you can take his word with more comfort.