Capital Hunter

It can be very painful. When my canary died I was 12 years old. I remember my heart broke so bad. I cried for days....

Yes I saw a movie on that exact thing. A father on a business trip to a city where her daughter was studying in the University.... You can guess the rest as who was behind the hotel door when he opened that door after calling for escort.... No, actually I am not worried now really but I would have been seriously when I was in contact with lots of ladies in the 19 to 25 age range. Like when I was teaching years ago, I even didn't dare to go to SCs or even dance bars. Came across my damn students everywhere that I went, out of bad luck......

First off, GFE or true GFE is always YMMV so a lady cannot likely advertised beforehand that she is a GFE or true GFE with 100% certainty but to respond to question put forward by OP in my view the emotional aspects of the experience is what makes the lady a true GFE. It includes lots of huggings, cuddlings, kissings and the connection between the two. In summary the chemistry rather than physics (the emotional connection rather than a list of services). GFE on the other hand is likely to represent a list of services that will be provided (lfk/dfk, daty, cbj, cfs). GFE in my understanding is more of physics than chemistry. I see that my comments and definition coincidently match your handle PhysicalChemistry LOL :-).

I can't let these comments go (or I wouldn't sleep tonight LOL). Likely indifference do more harm than good as far as separatism is concern. Any federal vote should also include Quebec votes in my view. The future lies with a Canada as Quebecers already demonstrated more than once that they wish to remain Canadians. I apologize for my earlier emotional comments in this post.

I agree with mod. Politics divide us and I don't wish the thread turn bad also. Just to say what I meant French and English Canadians fought alongside each other IN TWO WORLD WARS and are still fighting alongside each other in Afghanistan AS WE SPEAK. I will have no more comments as it is a hot topic I would like all of us to remain friends and united.

Since you mentioned me in your post...... Canada will cease to exist as we know it. It will not be the same Canada. I would look at it as statements of facts and history rather than nationalism. And If you know about me then you would know why I might be a bit nationalistic about Canada but it is not crazy as you put it because this nationalism is trying to bring people together and not used for divisions and hate. Not caring about what happens is the one which I don't understand it. because all our lives will be affected (adversely in my view) if it ever happen (God forbid). Yes I do agree if more than half of Quebers wants to separate they should and have the right. But lets provide all the facts about what unite us rather than what should divide us (if there are any) rather than saying I don't care. Go and good luck LOL!!!. Quebecers may think we don't care......

United we stand.... Canada is the best country in the world. One reason for making Canada the best is the bilingual nature of this country and that is because we have Quebec as a province of Canada and the other being our multicultural society and how various cultures get along so well and live together in peace and harmony (not to mention increasing level in inter-racial marriages, and restaurants and many more....). Quebec is what is making Canada so unique in the world. It is like the crown for a king. What would remain of Canada without Quebec? and what would be Quebec without Canada? We share so much of history, happiness and sadness together for so many years. We fought wars against our common enemies for so many years. We share our victories and defeats. We celeberated and wiped together for so many years. Quebers and rest of Canadians stood alongside each other and defended this country against the enemies for so many years. We built this great country together and alongside each other for decades. We fought alongside each other to acquired our rights together. We shared ministers and Prime Ministers and many more. We have many hundreds of thousands of people who are born as a result of love between Quebecer and non-Quebecer Canadians and after all these you want to separate!!!!!!?????? Millions of people all over the world are lined up for years to get a chance to become Canadian citizens. Quebecers are already citizens of this great country and they want to break!!!??? The whole world is shocked and numbed by even hearing about this. God bless Canada forever.

As someone who has much stronger attraction to younger ladies (19 to 25), I can tell the OP that I have come across many cases that the age is understated by between 2 to 10 years. That is why recently I am going for advertised age of 19 to 21 only. Having said that very few of those ladies are cerb ladies though. I can give you solid evidence for what I said above lol. A couple of months ago a very young looking lady (from an unknown agency) advertised as 19, showed up at my place. So I demanded an ID as I suspected underage. Initially she refused but I made it clear that the appointment will not o ahead otherwise. She showed me her passport (which I checked thoroughly) and she was actually 23!!! (born in 1988 lol). Another example last year, a very young looking lady (again from another unknown agency - Yes I like to TOFTT new agencies) and I asked for ID and she immediately provided and she was born in 1986!!! She was 24 at the time and advertised as 18!!!. I think that Well established ladies are more truthful about their ages, however, the ones new or recently started ladies (the ones I see mostly) likely understate their ages by as I said several years at the least. And oh yes asian SPs are the worst LOL!!!.

What you failed to mention was that, this is also 1.3 million LESS than a majority of total votes. Also interesting that your title says enough with political mathematics and immediately below you throw in a whole bunch of numbers lol!!!. For the life of it I can't even begin to understand why should an eligible person would choose not to cast a vote. I can understand if someone is sick that day or immobile but a healthy individual not exercising her or his vote is beyond me. People are ready to give up their lives in other parts of the world to achieve what most of us take as granted. At the end we are both entitled to our opinions, but at the time (and likely for decades to come) your preferred way is the way our system works and will work.

No I assume that two-third of the 30% who voted for liberal, Bloc, Green would have voted NDP not everone (almost sure all 9% green/Bloc votes would have gone to NDP in run up election, as their idealogy is much closert o NDP than Cons and slightly more than half of those voted liberal which I think would have been a good chance). May be like many countries we need two elections. One to elect MPs and one separate to elect head of state. Options are plenty and I am certainly not a constitutional expert but in my view, a party forming a majority government with under 40% of vote (and less than one quarter of eligible voters) is just not true democracy, especially if they want abuse their majority and impose their rules/beliefs,ideas upon the remaing 76% of eligible population who did not vote for them or their ideas!!!.

Anybody cares (or dares) to elaborate what would happen to the prostitution laws in Canada now that a strong majority conservative government is elected?

Ah, I posted in the wrong thread. Sorry...

Yes that was my point. Canada's electrol system needs changing for a fairer definition of majority. I mean a run up election between the top two may be a logical solution (unless a single party secures 50%+ in the first ballet). Then it will be a majority. With this electrol system, a 24% of eligible voters (or 39% of voters who voted) for a party (less than a quarter of eligible population) gives the cons a majority. Likely a runner up election would have been a NDP government as I think most of those voted for liberals and Bloc and Green are centre or center left. I hope so on your second point. I am cautiously optimistic. PS - By 24% I mean 39% of the 61% eligible voters who voted.

Only 24% of Canadians voted for conservatives!!!! Well, it is all over and we have to wait and see. I sincerely hope that you are right docottawa. I agree that if they try to use their majority to implement changes not on their platform they would quickly lose their support but even if their support falls very significantly, there is not a single thing that the we can do until another 4 to 5 years when there will be another election. In the meantime, theoretically speaking they can do anything they want because they have a majority (a blank cheque). I hope that they are wise enough not to do so, out of respect for democracy (something they yet have to learn lol!!!). I really do and I am cautiously optimistic from Harper's moderate stand on issues this afternoon with reporters. He said he wants to build on trust of Canadians and that he is humbled!!!. He should remember that only 24% of Canadians voted for him (that is 39% of the 61% who voted).

I mean for example proposing or attempting to pass laws to ban freedom of choice stemming from their personal religious belief. I didn't mean a religious republic LOL. Proposing or passing laws to ban people's rights (women's rights, gay rights, .....) or proposing or attempting to pass laws to make consensual prostitution illegal and many other examples...... They all stem from their personal religious beliefs and they can keep them for themselves and not try to impose it upon the whole population.They were not running on these issues when they were voted in. If a government start making moral decisions and try to impose their rights and wrongs on the people (especially when 61% have voted for alternatives) then we will have a religious republic similar to notorious countries in the Middle East. Do we want that lol?. I don't believe many politicians in Canada drives their values from religion (may be conservative politicians) but not the majority of Canadian politicians are religious zealots, I don't think so.

What cons stand on issues such as abortion, prostitution, gays' rights, women's rights ...... are out of religious beliefs. I have met many religious people in the past 5-7 years who were determined to vote for conservatives only because they were against freedom of choice on above topics (even though they did not agree with cons in many other subjects that they stand for), and they believed that the cons will fight against them or will end them if they win a majority. Lets see how Canada will be in 2015 on above topics. Also who will be the (nine) judges (appointed by PM) for the important job of a judge in the Supreme court of Canada.

I am not sure Why you quoted me with your comments Apex!!!!????. I never said I didn't get up to vote. After work before I did anything else, I headed to my polling station and voted. I never said 61% of people did not vote!!!!!. I said 61% of those voted did not vote for conservatives but other parties because they did not want conservative agenda and I was saying that the conservatives must respect the will of majority and do not go ahead with a possible right wing religious agenda that they may have. Yes hopefully it is.I am more against the Bloc than cons. The cons have an idealogy different to mine (I strongly believe in equality, freedom of choice and human rights, in particular women's right...) and I respect theirs even though different with mine, but Bloc stands for division and destruction. I do NOT respect that.

Happy birthday Megan and my best wishes for your special day.

39% is a majority?. The other 61% have to be ruled by this MINORITY. Yes still better than many other countries where the top unelected 5-10% rule. So yes it is a democracy (relatively). I hope that they come to their senses and end the scandals and corruptions and respect the democracy for a change and more importantly stay clear of implementing religious agenda which most Canadian do not want. They must remember that 61% of Canadians did not vote for them and did not wish their agenda.

61% of Canadians did not want the cons and they are now going to decide how we all going to live our lives for the next 5 years. This is travesty as a sign that Canadian electrol system needs mending. What I see (and I hope I am wrong) is a Canada shifting to the right both in its foreign policy and internally a more religious state where individuals' rights and freedom of choice, in particular women's rights may come under attack and economically a country where poor will get poorer and rich will get richer. What we need is a runner up election (unless one party gets 50% of the vote the first round) between the top two contenters and whoever gets 50%+ should form the government.

CBC declared a conservative majority..... We are not amuzed :icon_sad:

Me too :-). It was a wash out at the time and my neighbor asked me if I really wish to go out to vote in this heavy rain (he himself had voted in advanced poll) and my answer was YES. I said because people all over the world are going out in rain of bullets and facing tanks to earn what we have been given. That is the right to vote and democratically elect a government. Rain is made of water not lead lol. Rain or shine Go out and vote!!!.

Mr. Layton climbed 17 points, to 97, on the Nanos Leadership Index, which measures perceptions of the leaders' trustworthiness, competence and vision for Canada. That compared to 88 for Mr. Harper and 39 points for Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff. "The one-day polling completed on the same day that the massage-parlour story broke showed that Jack Layton's score improved, including perceptions related to trust," said Mr. Nanos. "This suggests that the story in fact helped Jack Layton, he said "A number of Canadians likely viewed it as a deliberate political smear."

It never crossed my mind that I had been challenged my friend. I just expressed my views as what bait and switch should be and likely what should not be. Thanks for the comments. Best regards, SA.

I don't travel much and I really dislike airports and air planes. I am generally against sex tourism because it is my understanding that most of the sex trade workers in the poverty striken countries like Cuba and Thailand ...... are forced into the trade either as a result of absolute poverty and for survival or forced by someone (a pimp). Likely same scenario exists for many sex workers here in Canada too but I believe there are also many cases where escorting is a choice of profession. Here I am very careful as whom I see but I don't have that privilege overseas where likely all are forced for one reason or another. Having said all above, if prostitution becomes illegal in Canada (if even outcall escorts become illegal) I will not go against the law. in spite of what I said above I will likely consider sex tourism but will choose a country equivalent to Canada (Britain, Australia....) where some of sex workers choose the profession rather than forced as the case may be in a poor country like Cuba or South East Asia. Additional Comments: