Sweet Emily J

The Sex Workers Are Coming! By Joyce Arthur This article will attempt to explain what sex workers want and need in a post-decrim world. http://rabble.ca/columnists/2013/04/sex-workers-are-coming

An interesting and easy to understand article explaining what could be next after the laws are struck down and what sex workers want and need in a post-decrim Canada: http://rabble.ca/columnists/2013/04/sex-workers-are-coming

[B]Whatâ??s the Difference?[/B] [I]By Maggie McNeill[/I] [URL="http://www.cliterati.co.uk/2013/08/whats-the-difference/"]http://www.cliterati.co.uk/2013/08/whats-the-difference/[/URL] [QUOTE] [IMG]http://www.cliterati.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/The-Courtesans-by-Paul-Delvaux-1943.jpg[/IMG] [B]I challenge you to distinguish a naked prostitute from any other naked woman.[/B] â?? Henri Leclerc No matter what Western religions claim, sex is no different from any other human activity once the possibility of creating human life is removed by birth control. I strongly suspect that realization is the real driving force behind most of the current American anti-abortion, anti-birth control rhetoric: moralists (perhaps unconsciously) realize that without the threat of lifelong consequences, people will stop seeing sex as a magical sacrament which is â??dangerousâ? without official sanctification. Without belief in the mystical significance of sex, prostitution is just another personal service like massage, hairdressing or wet-nursing. And once one recognizes that, one has to question the necessity for special laws which only apply to sex work. Take â??pimpsâ?, for instance. If all the stereotypes and drama are stripped away, â??pimpâ? is just a pejorative term for a prostituteâ??s agent; there is no innate moral difference between such a person and an agent representing a writer, actress, football player, etc. Itâ??s true that some such relationships are exploitative, but the same can be said of any other agent/performer or employer/employee relationship: itâ??s the exploitation which is bad, not the relationship itself. In my column â??Thought Experimentâ? I wrote, "â?¦as Iâ??ve pointed out on numerous occasionsâ?¦the abusive, controlling pimp of legend is so rare we can consider him an anomaly. In fact, the fraction of prostitutes who have such an abusive pimp â?? roughly 1.5% â?? is so similar to the percentage of women who report that their husbands/boyfriends are either â??extremely violentâ? (1.2%) or â??extremely controllingâ? (2.3%) that itâ??s pointless to consider them a different phenomenon, especially when one considers that any non-client male found in the company of a whore will inevitably be labeled a â??pimpâ? by cops or prohibitionists. The notion that hookers only have relationships with a certain kind of man, who is labeled a â??pimpâ? by outsiders, derives from the Victorian fallacy (alas, still alive today) that we are somehow innately â??differentâ? from other women, and therefore our men are different as well." The rest of that column presents an analogy between whores and barbers which may help you to see through to the truth of the matter. Itâ??s very important that people do understand, because claims of â??exploitationâ? are used to demonize anyone who has anything to do with a prostitute, including clients, drivers, boyfriends, secretaries, landlords and even dependent adult family members; in the UK, such laws are regularly used to charge hookers working together for safety under the absurd pretense that they are somehow â??exploitingâ? each other. Where sex work itself is legal, this allows workers to be persecuted in spite of that; where itâ??s illegal the penalties for these â??offensesâ? are usually greater than those for simple prostitution. In the United States, prostitution itself is generally a misdemeanor while â??panderingâ? and â??availsâ? charges are often felonies, and if the prosecutor decides to label such relationships â??human traffickingâ? they can result in asset seizure, decades-long sentences and consignment to â??sex offenderâ? registries. But since feminists think itâ??s just grand for a woman to have employees, agents or even a dependent husband if sheâ??s a politician or corporate executive, why does it suddenly become intrinsically â??exploitativeâ? if sheâ??s a sex worker? Sex worker rights advocates, human rights organizations and health experts all support the decriminalization model; this means that there should be no special laws which apply only to hookers but not anyone else. Brothels, for example, are subject to the same workplace safety and other applicable laws as govern any other business, and if an employee of such a place feels sheâ??s been treated unfairly she can make a complaint just as any other employee of any other business could. There is no need for any special â??anti-pimpâ? law, because the existing laws work just fine when the trade isnâ??t forced into the shadows; in Colombia (which doesnâ??t have full decriminalization but is much closer than the U.S.), for example, a whore who is cheated out of her fee can summon a cop just as a restaurant owner couldâ?¦as Secret Service Agent Arthur Huntington discovered to his chagrin. New Zealand decriminalized in 2003, and though most everyone other than diehard prohibitionists are happy with the results in general, there are still a few bugs: "More than 40 [street sign] poles have been bent, buckled or broken in the past 18 months in one area of south Auckland, New Zealandâ?¦â??Prostitutes use these street sign poles as dancing poles,â? said [a member of the city council. The claim appears in a pamphlet]â?¦detailing frustrations of residents and businesses struggling to cope with [streetwalkers and calling]â?¦on parliamentâ?¦to give Auckland Council powers to ban sex workers from certain areasâ?¦otherâ?¦incidents [include]â?¦a transvestite [ramming] a supermarket trolley into a womanâ??s car before lying across the bonnet, and a school-bus full of children observing a transvestite changing her dressâ?¦" While I can certainly sympathize with the residents who have to put up with these antics, I feel compelled to ask: arenâ??t vandalism and indecent exposure already illegal for everyone? Why does there need to be a special law banning all prostitutes from the area? If the police canâ??t enforce the existing laws against this kind of aggressive and disruptive behavior, how will even more laws help? The answer, of course, is that they wonâ??t; belligerent transvestites and abusive pimps are just the excuses used by prudes to restrict the majority of sex workers who are guilty of nothing other than being sexual. [/QUOTE]

Thank you for sharing, Eva. :) On the opposite side, I have some wonderful clients who have very intense orgasms as well. :) I, personally, think it is really awesome, but I can tell that sometimes some of them are embarrassed or think that I will think they are strange. Nothing could be further from the truth, as I think it is beautiful! I can imagine that at another point, they may have felt judged, possibly by a less understanding, less open partner. Sharing an orgasm with another person is such a personal and intimate thing, it needs to be handled with care. This is when people are often at their most vulnerable. It's like a sneeze or any other bodily function... Everyone kind of does it a bit differently, and it's best when you just let it out naturally and completely. Unnaturally stifling it will only lessen it. Anyone who accepts this, and openly welcomes all the juices, smells, noises and uncontrollable movements that come with a great sexual experience, will be a gem to their partner. :) P.S. The way you described your orgasm turned me on :cooter: xo

http://www.Shemale-Canada.com :biggrin: It's owned by DeSign Co, the same folks who own CERB and http://www.escorts-canada.com, so it's legit.

Me too! :biggrin: I try to avoid pants whenever possible.

Husband tells of his life married to a sex worker By Lucy Kippist http://www.heraldsun.com.au/lifestyle/husband-tells-of-his-life-married-to-a-sex-worker/story-fni0d7e4-1226693480721

The Secret World of the Student Sex Worker By Rebecca Schofield http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/rebecca-schofield/student-sex-workers_b_3706988.html

[B]You can be a feminist and a sex worker[/B] [I]Sex workers deserve to be afforded the same dignity and respect as any other woman[/I] [URL="http://www.independent.co.uk/biography/leanora-volpe"][B]By Leanora Volpe[/B][/URL] [URL="http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/you-can-be-a-feminist-and-a-sex-worker-8744176.html"]http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/you-can-be-a-feminist-and-a-sex-worker-8744176.html[/URL] [QUOTE]Some people are of the firm conviction that sex work is always exploitative, degrading, and undermines any attempts being made elsewhere to secure womenâ??s place in intellectual and professional spheres. If you get your boobs out in a bar or for a lads' mag, or work as a prostitute, you are labelled as a slut and itâ??s assumed that you have no self-respect. This idea of sex work as degrading doesnâ??t sit right with me, because for all the work that has been done to give women choices and rights, some women who proudly declare themselves feminists slut shame and body police when it comes to those who work in the industry. This version of feminism is more than a little uncomfortable, because sex workers are systematically victimised, criminalised and shamed for expressing their sexuality in a way that doesnâ??t conform to the â??acceptableâ?? version of sex weâ??ve created in our minds. Our defence against the proverbial â??manâ?? who is out to get us and lock us in the kitchen falls down at the point where we need it most. â??Your body does not belong to them!â? they cry. The last time I checked, it doesnâ??t belong to you, either. Feminism is nothing more than the belief that woman are deserving of equal rights and opportunities. No bra-burning, man-hating or body hair-cultivating is required, and sex work, when it is willing and consenting, is not â??anti-feministâ??. Sex workers havenâ??t raised a white flag and said â??oh alright then, use my body as you please, itâ??s not like I wanted to be treated like a human being anywayâ??. Itâ??s just sex work, and regardless of what economic and social circumstances surround a womanâ??s choice to enter the sex industry, she should be allowed the dignity to feel empowered by her choice, not labelled a victim of her circumstances. Sex work is not without its dangers, and the sex industry has its fair share of coercion and abuse, but when sex workers get assaulted or raped, or even murdered, they are not treated with the same empathy as other female victims of assault. Because they have â??put themselves at riskâ??, they are told they ought to â??expectâ?? men to treat them badly. This puts the onus of rape onto the women who experience it, rather than those who commit it. Itâ??s toxic and damaging, and women in sex work are not the flood gates holding back the tide of male desire to protect â??otherâ?? women from rape and assault. They are not â??asking for itâ?? by placing themselves in that position. This opposition to sex work doesnâ??t liberate women, it strips them of their voice and turns them into bodies, which as far as I can tell is what feminists who oppose sex work are so angry about in the first place. To tell a women what she can and cannot do with her body smacks of â?? gasp â?? misogyny. We rightly defend a womanâ??s right to say â??noâ??, but we must equally defend her right to say â??yesâ??. You can be a feminist and like male attention. You can be a feminist and shave your legs. But above all else, you can be a feminist and be a prostitute. And itâ??s about time we stopped limiting female experience to a set of purist ideals under the guise of feminism, and started empowering women from all walks of life to make their own choices without judgement. [/QUOTE]

Actually, this is not true, and most people don't realize it. There is very little that is "private" on CERB. Almost all threads and posts are available to anyone browsing the internet. The only exceptions are: content that members set to private on their own profiles, the social groups, the tiny section for elite members and the SP Only area. You do not need to register, have a membership, or be logged in to have access to any of the other general content on CERB. At the bottom of the main page it shows who is online: Currently Active Users: 1535 (646 members and 864 guests and 25 Spiders) 864 non-members are browsing CERB right now. However, that still doesn't make it a "public space" according to the law.

Do away with , and erase it's entire history & effect on humanity. :biggrin: Sounds simple enough.

Congrats, handsome! :) I always love to read your posts! Keep keeping it real! xox

Just about any SP would do this if you approach her properly and pay her regular rate. It's not an unusual request at all. I don't really understand why you would have trouble finding this, unless there is something you have left out. I also don't understand why you wouldn't just see a regular, recommended MA, as this is their specialty.

It really doesn't make a huge difference, as long as they are clean, lol. :) But admittedly, I am a bit partial to boxer briefs :) I really like colours too. In any form of undies for men, colourful makes me happy. I love bright green, red, purple, or orange. Or any colour really other than white or black is exciting to me. Boxer shorts are cool sometimes too. It can be fun to pull down a man's pants and he's got colourful boxers with cute monkeys on them, or big red lips or something unique. :) Whatever makes you feel comfortable and sexy is fine by me :) And that said, I am constantly surprised at how many gents go commando! Who knew! :)

I like both giving AND receiving equally, and I don't have to choose between them and I never will. :) It's all about balance. That said, I really do love to please and can be fully satisfied by devoting all of my attention to the man in my company at the time :) I like to be that break in his day or week where he gets to just lay back and pleasured like a king for an hour or two. :) It makes me happy. I can equate it to like at Christmas when you are super excited to give a really awesome present you got for someone. Anyone with a heart knows that it truly does give you a good feeling to give. One can be quite satisfied just with that feeling of giving, but it is also really awesome when you receive something special from someone else too. (Like explosive DATY orgasms ;))

This is the kind of dumb shit "boys" I fooled around with in high school said. It's immature and stupid. And I would actually question how good the sex life of a grown man really is, if they have that kind of lame inhibitions about something like that. To each their own, sure, but if you can kiss and you can get a BJ, you can kiss after a BJ too. Most people learned that cooties were not real when they were like 7. :icon_rolleyes:

A handfull of naughty new goodies over the past week at www.blogasms.xxx !! :biggrin: Videos, articles and a beautiful collection of taco tickling photos! :cooter: :aol_diddle: