Sweet Emily J

This idiot is the G&M's "Sex Columnist" and admittedly knows nothing about this subject she is talking about in the article and says she has never even to a strip club. Oy. I am actually quite surprised and impressed with many of the user comments. The last article about prostitution in a mainstream newspaper that I read was that stupid CBC NFLD one about a month ago, and the user comments were nearly all anti-prostitution. Seems the opposite with this article, and some great feedback, in fact. "Strippers make more money than you do, they don't need to pick up extra cash walking your dog, they don't need or want your charity or your sympathy. But thanks for looking down on them" "This article is even less helpful than the original one. Most journalists don't go looking for someone to agree with them and then write up an article. They look for both sides of the debate. Perhaps the author should heed the advice that the thing to do when you find that you have dug yourself a hole is to stop digging." "This is embarrassingly sheltered, classist, and naive all rolled into a condescending prude ball. Seek out the PoV's of a few sex workers. It will also make you a better reporter and you'll learn a few things about life." "The man who wrote the letter asked for responsible, non-judgmental guidance. What he got was an idiotic, sanctimonious diatribe. If Amberly McAteer wishes to make a fool of herself with moronic tales from the ivory tower, that is her prerogative. That the G&M decides to print her nonsense under the guise of "advice" displays a paucity of judgement and respect for its readers."

Walk your dog for a nominal fee? C---.

Did you know... ...BP censors the word DATY but not cunnilingus? lol, silly people! :)

Funny, but true. I did an outcall once to visit a man at the house he shared with his wife, while she was at work, and it was the most uncomfortable hour of my life. I will never do it again. I don't understand why men try this, and I think it is just asking for trouble. It's almost like sub-consciously they want to get caught. Maybe if she is out of town for the weekend or something, then there's a bit more leeway, but even then, a long blonde hair, the tiny corner of a condom wrapper, a lingering scent, or any number of things could be an easy giveaway. One can dig his own grave, but imagine the awkward and potentially dangerous situation the SP would be put in if wifey comes home early. As cautious as one is, why not just eliminate the possibility altogether and either rent a hotel room, or just do an incall. Playing it safe could also alleviate a lot of unnecessary stress for both parties too. :) To each their own, but in my own life, I try to stay as drama-free as possible and avoid situations when possible that have a high potential for being troublesome.

Mike Stobbe, The Associated Press Published Wednesday, June 19, 2013 1:53PM EDT http://www.ctvnews.ca/health/hpv-vaccine-cuts-infections-in-teen-girls-by-half-u-s-study-1.1332578 ATLANTA -- A vaccine against a cervical cancer virus has cut infections in teen girls by half, according to a study released Wednesday. The study confirms research done before the HPV vaccine came on the market in 2006. But this is the first evidence of how well it works now that it is in general use. "These are striking results and I think they should be a wake-up call that we need to increase vaccination rates," said Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Only about half of teen girls in the US have gotten at least one dose, and just a third of teen girls have had all three shots, according to the latest CDC figures. HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection. The vaccine protects against certain types of the human papillomavirus that cause most cases of cervical cancer. The shots work best if given before someone is sexually active so the emphasis has been on giving the shots to 11- and 12-year olds. The CDC study compared infection rates in girls before and after the vaccine became available. In girls ages 14 to 19, the proportion infected with the targeted strains of HPV fell from about 12 per cent to 5 per cent, a reduction of 56 per cent. Among girls who had gotten the vaccine, the drop in HPV infections was higher -- 88 per cent. There are two vaccines against HPV, but the study mainly reflects the impact of Gardasil, the Merck & Co. vaccine that came on the market in 2006. A second vaccine approved in 2009 -- GlaxoSmithKline's Cervarix -- probably had relatively little bearing on the results, said the CDC's Dr. Lauri Markowitz, the study's lead author. Both vaccines are approved for use in males and females -- in ages 9 to 26 for females, and 9 to 21 in males. The vaccine was only recommended for boys in late 2011, and the CDC has not yet reported data on how many boys have gotten the shot since then. HPV vaccination requires three shots over 6 months. An estimated 75 to 80 per cent of men and women are infected with HPV during their lifetime. Most don't develop symptoms and clear it on their own. But some infections lead to genital warts, cervical cancer and other cancers. The study didn't look at cervical cancer rates. It can take many years for such cancers to develop, and not enough time has passed to know the vaccine's impact on cancer rates, CDC officials said. The study involved interviews and physical examinations of nearly 1,400 teen girls in 2003 through 2006 and of 740 girls in 2007 through 2010. The vaccine's impact was seen even though only 34 per cent of the teens in the second group had received any vaccine, and only about 20 per cent got all three doses. That result will likely feed an ongoing discussion about whether all three doses are necessary, Markowitz said. Overall, the study found no significant change over time in the proportion of teens who'd ever had sex and in those who had multiple sex partners. However, it did find that a higher percentage of vaccinated teens said they'd had three or more sex partners. That could have driven down infection rates, Markowitz noted, if the teens who got vaccinated were the ones at highest risk of getting an infection and spreading it. The research was released online by the Journal of Infectious Diseases.

Every prescription medication out there has side effects for some people. Even things considered to be as relatively harmless as birth control pills have a list of possible side effects that long, too. I'm not a huge supporter of the pharma world, and don't know much about this drug aside from this and a few other articles, but it sounds like it could possibly be a pretty decent medical breakthrough in the fight against AIDS.

Thankfully in real political democracy, the general public does not usually vote specifically on the issues that directly affect the whole population. We vote to elect someone who we trust is actually fully educated about all the issues, knows all of the details about proposed laws and changes, weighs pros/cons and recognizes possible outcomes and how they will affect the entire population. They will then vote on the specific issues how they best see fit to serve the people.

Concupiscent commentary, sex education, the best erotic photos around, and lots of other sweet & saucy goodies at Blogasms :) www.blogasms.xxx

It is unclear what this part of your post has to do with the original topic of being safe, and it kind of just sounds like you have a gripe. However, in my experience, many e-mails I receive go unanswered not because I have no concept of how to run a business, but because the sender has no concept as to how to address a lady. Or the information I requested is not included and I have other e-mails waiting with all the proper info. Or possibly because the sender is a known bad date. These things include probably at least half of the correspondence I receive regarding "prospective appointments". We are in the business to make money and meet new clients. We LOVE to receive e-mails for prospective appointments and respond to them. But only the ones that are polite, and complete. We don't care to acknowledge or have time to respond to all the other crap that crowds our inboxes. I am not saying this is why you seem to have a problem with this, but I do sometimes see hobbyists complaining about this, and they never seem to think that maybe they are the reason for the lack of response.

Escort services already are HST taxable. In Ontario, just like any other self employed individual (aside from those selling the few exempt goods/services) who claims over $30,000 per year in business income, escorts who gross over that threshhold must be an HST registered business and be paying into it. 13% off the top of every donation paid to a legitimate tax paying HST registered escort goes straight to the government; the rest is then taxed again as income.

Congrats. Now do me. :motion:

Maggie Gyllenhaal :cooter: So sweet & naturally pretty: And oh so sexxxy: And more loveliness: