Dori

Downtown has too many eyes (for those of us with a lot of friends of friends and close acquaintances) and the parking situation is absolutely horrendous in the downtown area. From experience, central and west end locations are always far better.

Its a good idea. In the past year or so there has been an increase in junkies in Kingston. So a lot of "users" will attempt to put up fake pics or just vague body shots. But once you get there you see why no face pics were used. Bait and switchers are climbing. It wasnt this bad before but its definitely a bigger issue now. In the last year or so I've left many times when I showed up and I saw what answered the door. Either because they completely lied in the ad in one way or another, or because they were obvious junkies. If the person you're contacting starts giving you a hard time or making up endless excuses why they cant give you a photo, just drop them. Its totally not worth the hassle to get there and having to walk away. Real providers dont give you the run around, and they dont waste your time either. They have nothing to hide. So the moment you run into someone with something to hide ..... run.

Its not scaremongering. I'm not going to put up links because they arent permitted to be posted here so I wont. But Kingston regulars can go to B P and they would know which ad it was I was referring to. It was an S P that I have a history with, so I know quite a bit about her. She would absolutely know who I was, without a doubt. At first I thought it maybe she's just coming out of retirement. So I messaged her and asked and said a few things and asked her certain things in specific ways that only she would know the correct response and answer to. The person responding to the message answered incorrectly. So its absolutely not her. I can guarantee its not her. So the fact that its not her, and the hint of it being a police presence makes it seem too suspicious. And trust me, if she came back out of retirement she'd be posting her come back here, as she did before.

I just saw an ad on BP from a S P that has been retired for almost 3 years. She was very well known. Just the ad was suspicious and not like her old ones. So I did a search on Google of the phone number and the first thing that came up was a post on a forum that states that police are setting up stings by using old photos and posting up ads to catch old regulars.

What's with all the deleted replies from people in the threads? That really doesnt help the industry in any way. Someone is going a little too "mod crazy" by deleting replies people put here. Eventually it will drive people away when they realize its futile to post anything that isnt a phony glaringly positive opinion or fluff piece. So what gives?

They cant kick in doors between two consenting adults, even if one is an "provider". What they can do is create fake "provider" accounts and fake "provider" ads and set up the individuals contacting those ads. Once the person show up to the agreed upon place, it shows intent to carry out what was discussed (hence "proof") that the person was going to exchange sex for money. But they would literally need to the person to show up to the location in order to do something.

Well if you look at how the media is actively portraying it to the public .... "criminalizing the purchasers who create the demand for paid sex. " .... which means this is how police departments will end up treating the whole thing. So basically it will be a carbon copy of the US system. They keep saying its the Nordic model, but its definitely not the Nordic model. http://news.ca.msn.com/canada/should-the-government-define-what-sex-is-1 They're preparing the public to get used to the idea of criminalizing the purchasers and see them as criminals.

Trust me, you wont find an attractive young asian SP in Kingston. Of all the ads for asian providers I have run into have been 100% fake and were running scams. Some have had scary incidents with them, so my advice is to stay clear of them.

Actually they dont have to wait for Bill C-13, they can already monitor online activities and get personal information pertaining to IP addresses without a warrant from ISPs: http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/internet-privacy-decision-by-supreme-court-comes-today The Supreme Court decides today whether the warrantless searches and monitoring is legal under the Charter of Rights, and whether police and law enforcement agencies can continue doing it.

Thats a flawed question for them to ask. School children get fingerprinted. I remember being finger printed in grade 6 when the OPP ran there "missing kids" campaign and claimed how finger printing kids would help find missing kids. That campaign ran in every school across Ontario. So technically every person would have to answer "yes".

I think I've seen a few Kingston SP's advertise that they do massages. Like Kassi Kisses.

Well if you take how the media is interpreting the wording its like this: "Criminalize the advertising of sexual services in print or online, with offenders facing a maximum prison term of five years. " http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/p...-sex-in-public That means thats how their legal reps have interpreted the bill, and thats how they will want the public to see it. Since the wording the Conservatives are using, like "perverts" and "scum", is portraying how they expect to treat the issue going forward, so they will definitely put pressure on the police forces to act in the way they are implying and they will set an example probably with quite a few (publicly) to make their message clear. So I definitely will expect for print and online advertising venues to close the option to advertise such services (whether you are independent or not) for simple fear of potential legal issues (in the same manner that Kijiji and Craigslist ended that option). The real downside is that it can also lead to some very shady areas such as disgruntled customers, or competitors to inform and snitch to the police of online/print advertising to get that individual in trouble. Couple that, with the new "anti-spam" laws coming into effect July 1st, and you have trouble if anyone claims you sent an unsolicited communication to them.

Incorrect. It applies to everyone! "Criminalize the advertising of sexual services in print or online, with offenders facing a maximum prison term of five years. " http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/prostitution-bill-would-make-it-illegal-to-buy-sell-sex-in-public

This proposed bill is ridiculous! Its a copy of the American model of prostitution, which is not surprising considering Harper's government is like Bush Jr. Lite. So the new bills provisions means this website has to come down, Including not being able to collect money for banner ads as well. No SP can advertise their services at all online on any website including their own. Next stop, mandatory minimum sentences for johns, pimps, and SPs.

You misunderstand by what I mean "too many eyes". I know a lot of people (A LOT) in Kingston. So I always run into someone I know, or knows someone I know. That includes having several close friends that work at various hotels. Therefore I have to be extremely careful, if you catch my drift. As for the hotel interruptions, housekeeping interrupted three of the very first hotel sessions I had in 3 different hotels. The worst was at the Ambassador and at the Holiday Inn at the Waterfront. They almost didnt knock and walked right in. Then there were various other hassles in other hotels, so I avoid visiting SP's that are at using them.