Brad

Some more Jessica Nigri...

I'm curious...if you love camping and your wife hates it, wouldn't she be relieved if you offered to go camping on your own and let her enjoy some activities she enjoys? Um...I think the consensus answer to your question is YES PLEASE! :) I keep trying to think what my own best one would be, but there's so many fun scenarios to imagine. A vacation away with a lady (or since this is a dream fantasy perhaps two) does sound fun. Maybe a European cruise where we can explore and have some adventures in various cities...and then explore and have some adventures on ship as well! I'm sure tomorrow I'll have a different answer. Really though, if I get to spend some time with a woman who is confident, happy, and engaging, I know it's going to be a fantasy encounter.

.... (nevermind, deleted response. Wasn't helpful or worth it).

I appreciate the answer Kubrickfan, While you and I have very different politics and I truly can't see the things in Trump that you do, that does help me see where you're coming from and--given your beliefs--why you'd support him. And while I may hope come November you're disappointed, thanks for the discussion.

Well Kubrickfan, while I strongly disagree (for pretty much all the reasons and examples laid out in previous posts) I appreciate that you at least seem able to have a reasonable discussion about it. Can I ask what you've seen that makes you expect he'll improve things? Is it that you believe he'll shake up the system somehow, undoing gridlock and corruption? Or is it specific policy of Trump's you can point to that you find positive? All I've witnessed is foreign policy disasters (people aren't exaggerating when they point to him being cozy with Russia, and admiring much worse). And if you saw any of his interviews before or after Brexit, it's terrifying that someone who wants to be a major world leader could be so uninformed (and uncaring!) about world events. If elected it's likely he'll get to elect two members of the Supreme Court (one for sure), which has ramifications literally for decades. On a policy level, it's actually very hard to get him to actually describe it beyond, and I quote, "I have a very good brain", but those he has outlined in any more detail terrify me. Again, plenty of examples have already been given. On a cultural level, all I've witnessed is him painting pictures of fear, fear, fear that, unsurprisingly, only he can keep us safe from. That and divisiveness. Specific examples of unapologetic racism and sexism have already been provided. I can only assume we are seeing very different sides. So--and I mean this questions without sarcasm--I'd be curious to understand what specifically you are seeing in him that I am not, what exactly you believe will change, or what policies of his you can point to that have real merit.

A couple things to consider... Different people want different things. There are a few people that will tell you the experience they get with an MP meets exactly what they are looking for. It's very subjective and depends on you, the lady, your chemistry, and a dozen other factors. You can read some of the reviews on various MPs to get a sense what some consider all the fuss as you put it. Maybe it's not the right experience for you, though a single encounter may not be enough to judge. As for whether you overpaid, I'm afraid there's also no straight answer for that, as there is no one right amount or standard measure. Ladies set the rate/donation amount that they deem right for them. There's a lot of discussion threads on this topic, but ultimately that's what it always comes down to. Each lady gets to decide what they believe they is right for their time. Whether you believe someone's donation amount is more than you want to pay is of course your own to make (by which I mean you get to decide if you want to book or not -- haggling or negotiating is a big no no).

Hmm, you're on this site and really have to ask that question? ;)

.

.

I also initially thought the OP was asking if hobbyists interested in seeing someone who is transgender should announce it was with the idea that doing so would help them connect with a person they'd like to see. If it is indeed instead due to the idea that he wants to know who to avoid, because of some idea that those who have been with a transgender person are at greater risk...well, that is very unfortunate to put it lightly. The idea that you're at greater risk being with a transgender person plays into outdated stereotypes and a lack of knowledge.

Given the name-calling, anger, and dismissive view you've taken to those who responded to your thread so far Jane, I'm not sure if you're actually looking for a discussion or other points of view, but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt. Assuming your above post is asking whether we prefer Trump or Clinton, then my answer is easily Clinton. Trump has said so many ugly, racist, and sexist things that I think it an indictment that he has so many supporters. I hope you won't accuse me of lecturing about idealism because I can't support someone who is explicitly prejudice, and unapologetically caters to that element of society. But beyond that (if there needs to be a 'beyond that') I'm happier to support someone who has experience and success in this kind of work. While I don't think Clinton is perfect, I also think a lot of the hate against her is the product of her adversaries simply repeating over and over again their attacks against her. Eventually the repetition alone makes people think it must be true. How many millions and investigations have been launched against her over Benghazi? The fact that none have shown her liable in any way becomes after a while less important than the fact that people keep bringing up the word as if the repeated accusations alone makes her guilty. I also don't have any problem with the fact that she's changed some of her views and positions over the years. It actually bothers me that politicians aren't allowed to change their minds as society evolves or better arguments are presented. Isn't that what should happen? Personally, I'm less likely to trust someone who hasn't changed a view in 30 years. On the otherhand, I simply don't see any evidence that Trump--cocksure alpha male that he is--is capable of politically dealing with the complexities of the world. Just look at how ahead of the Brexit vote he stated he didn't overly care which way it went. You want to be a world leader but be gleefully ignorant of world events? That never ends well. And even all that aside, for me it can come down to looking at what each has achieved in the past policy-wise and what each promises to do in the future. There may be some things about Clinton I disagree with, but even if you support all of Trump's promises surely the fact that he either refuses or is incapable of explaining how he'll actually achieve any of them ought to be worrisome?

More from this scene here: http://porn-superheroes.tumblr.com/post/139118494661

.

Thinking happy thoughts...

My vote is this is a good thing. Sex trafficking is a terrible thing and I hope this helps them shut even some of it down and help some of those caught up in it. There's also no reason to think from this article that trafficking remains the primary concern of law enforcement, which is as it should be. I can't say I really see how it would be used much by police for finding legitimate and independent escorts. I mean, if they really wanted to meet or find some, that's pretty much something they can do already, and more easily than using this kind of tool.