Zarhan Fastfire

I am inclined to agree WhereIRoam. Voodooking, you've heard the phrase fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity right? That's what you're doing. Contributing to a thread about contributing to a site which you don't believe in anymore, and arguing against contributing, in the form of a contribution, to a site you obviously read quite a bit. Can you see how messed up that is? With each post, you dig yourself deeper into a dark hole: contributing is pointless, experienced clients know enough without us bothering--seriously, are you just trolling? Because it sure sounds like it, unless you've grown so cynical over the years that you can't see light for all the darkness surrounding you. "Experienced" clients are the only ones who matter and even they don't benefit from talking--'cause they're these strong silent types I suppose. I can't even take this argument seriously. "So what if some guy gets mugged his first time answering an ad. That'll learn 'im. Man up." If that's really your attitude and you refuse to contribute constructively--really, what have you actually said in this thread but whine about your own supposed dark past, bitch about people who do contribute, call them liars, and basically tell everyone else they are all somehow better off if they shut up? I'm not wasting my breath anymore. But I do suggest you privately address in yourself the contradiction in what you're saying versus what you're doing: perhaps it's best you practice what you preach: stop contributing altogether if that's what you really believe, starting with this thread, and then the site.

One quarter of your posts are about this person (4 out of 16), at least one person has replied to you saying this person quit "years ago". Most of the rest of your posts (all of them?) are also asking another two or three girls, any or all of whom have probably moved on to other things by now if no-one is responding about them. Maybe it's time to consider other providers? Plenty of fish in the sea.

Voodoo King, you may want to read a bit more widely than you have done on here, perhaps, and discover that posts are mostly not about "bragging" or basic information (even if that's often what's requested by some). They're also about safety and avoiding risks physical and otherwise, etiquette, do's and don'ts, etc. There are discussions about the laws of the land and those who enforce them. There are threads out there that have nothing to do with the 'main topic' here. Now, if what you've been saying all along here is that you shared TOO MUCH information in the past, fair enough, and that's one thing. But to go from one extreme to the other (sharing "nothing") is just as bad. Point taken there are braggarts and fiction-writers in this world (again, nature of the beast), but that's why the site has a rating system (thanks and nominations) and people with one or two posts are less likely to be believed than those with a few dozen or a few hundred. It's why corroboration of data matters. There are many people on this board and the other who have literally avoided being robbed, scammed or assaulted because of this site. Think about that. You are probably one of them. And even if not, you know what? You still benefited from that information being put out there for you. So you're saying to all that, "I'm all right, Jack," and that's that. And don't care what happens to anyone else? Is that how you live your life in general? How's that working out? When I saw a car crash into another one in broad daylight, I did not just drive home. I got out of my car, walked over to the scene and after assuring myself no-one needed help, talked to the driver I considered to be not at fault, and told him I'd be a witness if he needed me. Likewise, when I saw a nastier car crash clearly caused by people drunk or more likely high at night, I did not just drive home. I stopped a reasonably safe distance away and called 911. Some will laugh, no doubt, that I'm comparing what I've just described to what we do here, but think about it: is it so far removed? In its own way, it is about civic responsibility, or at the very least looking out for your neighbour (more true than any of us will ever know). If I may belabour the point, since I feel I really need to get through to you: we are supposed to be here helping each other out--including learning from each other's mistakes. If one of us ran into trouble, by sharing it (not personal details, mind you) he prevents others from running into that same trouble. And if one of us had a good time, then so might others. So, yes, I consider sharing information about good providers in its own way as important as sharing information about scammers, muggers and B/S. Two sides of the same coin. Steering clear of the rocks is made that much easier if there is a lighthouse pointing them out, but there also has to be a shore, a destination, in sight, or else what's the point of it all?

As the OP said, the source of annoyance is not (or should not be) that "non-contributing" members also benefit from information the rest of us provide; if you think that's ever going to stop on any BBS on any topic... All I can say is, that's the nature of the beast. Too many people seem to think a forum is about asking for rather than sharing with. But anyone who stops contributing to the public board because of this is only adding to the problem, and defeating the purpose of the site--which means defeating yourself in the process: if everyone took that attitude there'd be nothing left but a bunch of unanswered questions. Keeping it simple: Are you asking for information from us? Then share information with us too. Call it a gentlemen's agreement: threads are not started unless you have information/discussion/opinion to share, as well as asking any questions. In other words, make the effort to do more than point out there's a new ad on BP, more than ask "Has anyone seen her?" (particularly if the ad is literally a day old or less). Do a bit of research (anything at all): TinEye search, Google Images, Google the phone number. Search it here, search the name here: if it's someone who's been reviewed before, add to that thread rather than starting a new one, which moves it to the top (makes it "live" again--maybe some of you haven't realized that's how they work). Likewise, if you discover a B and S or anything else potentially dangerous, report it. It's not a lot to ask. On the subject of asking about ladies who used to work at X but moved, well, sometimes that's legitimate (they've gone indy, etc.), but yeah, if you've had to ask several times, might be time to move on.

Ad's gone. If she's half Filipina as she says, you'd think she wouldn't call herself half "Filipino"...

http://www.kijiji.ca/v-health-beauty/winnipeg/chinese-style-massage-for-relaxation/1223328586?enableSearchNavigationFlag=true Still there apparently. Did anyone here give it a try?

Sorry for any cross-post issues. There has been some discussion of this on the other board: http://m.winnipegsun.com/2016/12/06/...asingly-online Over the course of that discussion, it was noted that on Radio One's The Current, during the show, whose focus was missing/murdered indigenous women, the new chief referred to johns in general as "the predators". I won't repeat my comments there, the gist of which was: the overall (unintended) effect of all of this, I think, is to antagonize some of the people who might actually be able to help in investigations, like the laws themselves criminalizing buyers and infantilizing sellers.

But ignore the one that comes up claiming it's "the police".

The ad is gone: any other deets, like a name?

It's just the two of them.

I said it from the start when the new law was enacted. Criminalize sex (for the buyer only) and you have the perfect opportunity for blackmail--criminal record, loss of friends and family--or money? Tough choice for a lot of people. Hence this poor guy being forced to claim, absurdly, after he has already paid 'thousands of dollars' to the extorter, that he was 'assaulted'. But you see he has to do that so as to escape charges and for the sake of a black-and-white narrative being presented in the media. I'm not saying a man cannot be sexually assaulted by a woman, under the broad definition used under the law (unwanted groping counts), but it's rather difficult to imagine someone being blackmailed for thousands, for a five-to-twenty-second video of you touching them, them telling you 'no', and you stopping. I doubt very much we'll hear of a video at trial in which he was pinned down and demonstrably wanked against his will for several minutes. Can you imagine any woman being blackmailed by a rapist? You don't blackmail people with evidence of your sins, you blackmail people with evidence of theirs. But (a) he cannot admit to it for obvious reasons and (b) neither can the police, for the same absurdly obvious reasons. But I do hope other victims of blackmail and (cough) sexual assault in Simi's, do come forward if there be any. Sounds like the owner was a greedy pig and deserves to be put away for a long time.

Spring Oriental then.

She was when was here in December. The ad that appeared in January was suspicious for the reasons outlined above. The Halifax ad is the same as the one which appeared here recently, down to the 604 phone number, only they've added a year to her age. So for what it's worth, the same person who put up this Winnipeg ad (which we find suspicious) is the one who put up the ad in Halifax. It does not bode well.

You're just getting around to asking that question now? You've already suggested she "might not be" with them once, as opposed to the simpler explanation, namely, the ad is a fake with stolen pics.

I doubt it. The ad makes no reference to being "back". Suddenly she's into a whole bunch of things not mentioned previously. Has there been one single positive review for Greyfriars Rd and Killarney confirming these people are legit? Till that happens, I'm not going to be making an appointment.

Veering a bit off topic, been to Mexico myself a few times mainly in the interior; true, some do advertise in US dollars online and might ask for them in coastal resorts (where prices are also at their highest and it certainly would not be worth going to those resorts just for the hobby--the rest of the country, yes). But if you pay in US dollars when the amount asked for is in pesos you'll be losing on the exchange as people tend to just take the amount and drop the zero which is far from the correct exchange and to your disadvantage. I think that's generally true wherever you go, including us right now. The usual exception is euros and sterling. Maybe that's why Americans are seen as generous tippers: they don't get around to exchanging currency?

Melody was here for two weeks in December from VIPOTG. An ad is now appearing with the same pics and name, but a completely different 604 area code number. Hope no-one is caught up in a B&S or waste of time.

I assume you're coming here from the States with a load of US dollars. I suggest you change those as soon as you get here since our own dollar is in freefall. Basically for you the country is on sale, so enjoy that. Why you would ever think Canadian SPs in Canada dealing mainly with Canadians would advertise their rates in US dollars is beyond me; maybe that's standard practice elsewhere but I've never heard of it here. For the local talent, everyone's got their own opinions, which are all over the board, which is quite easy to search. For the occasional and recurring travelling talent, those coming from the East (Québecoises), some indy, some with agencies, likewise searchable; and those from the Far East (Koreans and Chinese) are also favoured, VIPOTG and to a slightly lesser degree Lori's house (Lady Kangnam) being trusted and recommended A(sian)gencies. Beyond that, know that there are lions, tigers and bears in Winnipeg, especially on Backpage. Beware fake ads. Beware ads that mimic other ads, particulary ones from agencies or people we do trust and recommend. Particularly as an out-of-towner, trust no-one not reviewed, and be sure that the one you're looking up is one and the same. Backpage is the Bermuda Triangle where many floats of cash have disappeared never to be seen again.

Agreed. There isn't even a contact number and refers to pics that aren't even there.

I've seen her twice, she is good looking, petite, slim, young (20s) and kind of bubbly. She's from Hong Kong and communication in English is very challenging for her, so any complicated requests may not work for you. (I speak some Mandarin and a bit of Cantonese which helps.) Not into kissing but offers her tongue, if that helps. Others on the other board have been less enthusiastic. ����. Added next day: The pics are her.

Contact info should be the least of your worries. Check the pics on Tin Eye.

Hawaiian punch!

Thought this looked interesting: http://www.kijiji.ca/v-health-beauty/winnipeg/massage-just-50-h-cash-only/1124531190?enableSearchNavigationFlag=true

http://www.kijiji.ca/v-health-beauty/winnipeg/phoenix-healing-centre/1107424888 I can't help but remark that this appears to have risen from the ashes of the former Phoenix on Notre Dame. The legends are true.

I went last week and saw Helen. I (Added later): I suppose I should say things are about the same as they were the last time I went and I am not sorry I went. I forget that the way things work here, my brevity might be misinterpreted.