Zarhan Fastfire

I saw her as Szara or Zsara along while back when she was.....indy :wink: I did repeat....then lost interest. What does 'indy' mean in this context? Are you saying she's not indie now?

Whoever wrote the ad is no competent speaker of French, certainly not a native one. No girl would describe herself as "nouveau" (masculine); in any case, it's obviously a translation of English "new in town" which is not how you'd say it in French. The whole thing is an attempt to represent someone as a Québecoise when they're not. Either there's no girl behind this or else the girl is not who she says she is so take that for what its worth.

Veering slightly off topic, well anything is possible but it's unhelpful (to put it kindly) for someone to throw mud against the nearest wall, for no apparent reason other than to see if it sticks. Vague accusations made, backed by no evidence, nor a reasoned argument, are a waste of everyone's time at best, and an insult to everyone's intelligence at worst, and may draw unwelcome questions from others as to what motivates the instigator. But as it is, there's so little to go on, I can't even tell if he's referring to the ad itself or to the previous poster.

Based on what?

Who in the name of all that's holy (or holry) ARE these people? From the latest ads: Ash "freshly plukt hottie pakedg now asap to just holars dillivery to your door live action now" and: "Just holra at me no dissipoinments.[...] up all morning late afternoon thank god back in peg" Blondie (?) "Blondie feaver live action blond star holra up late so appreshiate deluxe action" and "Freshist face ever x cheerleader sunshine dime bomm Chik just beautiful" Does anyone have a clue what "dime bomm" means? Is there one person among this crew that can spell more than three words in a row? Who do they get to visit them?

Where do you get that idea? Three pics clearly the same person, 2 pics of shoes clearly the same shoes. There were already two other threads on Stacy and so far there's been one TOFTT and it was positive. She only does OC of course and she might not be to everyone's taste but certainly not a scam or a sting. Unless you think this isn't the original Stacy and her pics etc. have been stolen?

Frustrating isn't it? I cannot be bothered searching for anyone going sexy lexi, sexy lexii, sexy lexy, or sexy lexie, or even sexy lexc for that matter. There's just too many. No imagination, some people.

You're right: http://www.straight.com/news/396106/little-enforcement-canadas-new-prostitution-laws-says-lawyer I do think intimidation is probably perceived as more effective and certainly less pointlessly destructive. Maybe most people really do have common sense after all.

Agree with this except about avoiding MPs. It's still pretty hard to catch someone in flagrante delicto in straightforward body rub oriented places.

I went about 2-3 weeks ago, not having read any of this, just knowing a girl who works there, and she told me about this and other incidents (someone making appointments and not keeping them). She seemed to think it was down to a disgruntled customer. And yes, business has suffered, which is a shame. I was parked on the first side street, after dark but not late, and experienced no problems then or since.

I think "first, do no harm" should be the mantra for every well intentioned person involved in social policy. If people stopped to think about what those words "first, do no harm" actually mean, they would begin to understand why they have to think through what their policies will result in. I agree with others that the Conservatives do not actually care, nor are they concerned that their policy flies in the face of classical liberalism (like their Republican counterparts to the south, whose 1990s through 2000s playbook they have been following since 2011). But there are many for whom the Conservatives' message resonates who do care, and they are the ones we need to reach, to make them understand that it is indeed possible to help the most desperate, but not through any kind of criminalization--victims of something these ones may well be, but casting "johns" as the melodramatic villains of the piece achieves nothing that means anything to them: it's not getting a girl off drugs, feeding her kids, getting her kids back from Child and Family Services, providing her with a stable home life of her own, etc., etc.). All it may achieve is, potentially, the ruining of the life and career of a few johns, either through loss of their jobs, forfeiture of their vehicles, or even turning them into self-haters through john school. And speaking of harm... Think it all through: first, do no harm. What are the consequences of my actions? What do I need to know about the problem I want to solve? You cannot accomplish anything unless you understand the background, the root causes, of the complex web of patterns you are trying to change. Friends, how can Stephen Harper possibly begin to address any of that when he refuses to acknowledge that a crime, such as a the murder of a 15 year old aboriginal girl in our very city, has at the very least a "sociological" context? By denying such a context exists (her age, her gender, her appearance), and focusing only on bringing her killer to justice, he all but ensures that she will be joined by another girl just like her in the future--and another, and another, and another. If there were a pattern of missing fortysomething men of a single ethnic group disappearing (let's say Ukrainian Canadians since there's still a few in the North End), we would hear about nothing else. Why is it that some people think that examining that context, the conditions which make some people vulnerable, is so undesirable? Why are we so god-dammed defensive when this kind of thing happens and so quick to say "nothing else could have been done" (as TB said in the Sun not long ago)? How long must we continue to turn a blind eye to that which is staring us all in the face every day in our cities? That young girl did not die "because" she was an aboriginal girl, but the fact it was more likely to happen is something that should give us all a long and sober pause of reflection. I doubt very much that someone like TB would have said there was nothing that could have been done to help her had she been white.

The fellow who pointed out that the balance of power shifts on to the SP's side (excessively) had it absolutely right--and this is what will make things difficult for SPs in general and new SPs in particular. Any SP with whom one is unfamiliar is a potential honey trap, or a blackmailer, as far as the less sophisticated punter is concerned (those who don't read these boards and have very little to go on but internet searches or ads in the phone book and the papers). I don't know what our entrapment laws are like but I am sure we have all seen honey traps at one time or another in the North End or the West End. And speaking of the netherworld which is Winnipeg's "low track", I was once approached by a sleazy guy literally dragging an unwilling lady along Ellice Avenue and it quite literally made my skin crawl. (I had stopped my car to take a call and my windows were open, so I guess he thought he saw his moment.) It burns me up to see so much energy wasted by both LE and the media's chatterboxes on all-but non-existent trafficking networks in presumably expensive city hotels or condos when the real thing, in all its ugliness, is going on under their very noses the way it always has. I draw two things from this. The fact is, there is no incentive to traffick women from countries where there is either high unemployment, a very low cost of living (where our dollars go so much further), limited freedom of choice, or an entrenched glass ceiling (how else does one explain the number of educated Korean women working here now?)--no need, because the incentive to make some real money makes the use of force redundant. Organized crime may well be involved with some such agencies (they may be easy targets), but most probably in the form of skimming ("protection" services) or buying them out on occasion. As has also been pointed out, when people think of the hobby and its SPs, they think of the sad plight of the addict or the very poor, at the mercy of whomever they choose to join in a car (conversely, he may also be at her mercy if she threatens him with a knife or calling LE on her phone). Sadly, these women (and a few men, mostly transgendered) exist and they exist in very large numbers. Anyone who has driven our city's mean streets without the rose-coloured glasses will notice them--in broad daylight, not just after dark. I am certain that on any given night in Winnipeg they outnumber the ads on Backpage by a factor of 100:1. This is what people think of, and they are not wrong in wanting "something" to be done about it. The problem is, of course, the laws do nothing but make a bad situation worse. All well and good for us to complain. We won't be heard unless we offer an alternative. Mine is simple enough: ok, society acknowledges that the women on the street are in danger and should not be criminalized for either supporting themselves, their kids, or their habits, but it still wants to "help" them. Fine. So put your money where your mouth is and help them instead of making it worse. If they really are doing this for drugs (and many are, no one disputes it, from oxycontin and Tylenol all the way up to meth and crack), supply them with the drugs they want until they are ready to enter rehab of their own free will--which may be never. For those who are not on drugs, but are having trouble making ends meet--make it easier for them: affordable housing, zero red tape for basic living benefits, and teach them how to balance a budget if they don't know how. Help them find a job that pays. After you've done all that, you know what? You will STILL have some left over who refuse to be "good". There will still be some who want more things and the money that buys those things than you can ever give--or they just don't do nine to five. You'll never stamp it out entirely, but you can at least keep the numbers low enough that you can manage this social illness instead of making it worse, as you are now. Worried now about all the "johns" who find fewer girls on the street? They will begin to save up so they can see the ladies online thereby making the invisible market online the new norm. That's not shuffling one problem from one area to another (which is what crackdowns in neighbourhoods achieves), it's making a dangerous activity that much safer. This, or something like it, is how it's done in places where it's legal. Would we were so enlightened.

There's a guy who has occasionally advertised his services as a driver on Backpage. You might find him if you search there. Be interesting to know if he provides references. Not sure if you'll find potential female drivers reading these posts, unless there are some SPs who would be willing to car pool and/or form some kind of network pooling resources beyond driving services (helping each other out is a actually a good idea, ladies--keep yourselves safe; like one night one girl drives, the next night she's the worker). You might ask fellow SPs (the ones who feel sisterhood as opposed to the ones who see every other SP as competition, who've never heard of enlightened self-interest).

What is the sound of one hand fapping?

I think further clarification might just be in order. Most massage is, by definition, "two hand" because that's how many hands most masseurs/masseuses possess. So by that definition, there certainly do seem to be a lot of ads for massage by people with two hands. Seems to me there are already lots of recommendations for that up and down the threads. How this belongs in a "fetish" thread is quite beyond me. Unless Almasy is under the impression that "two hands" means "two pairs of hands", which could be what the OP meant (I guess that could be construed as a fetish by some but not by most people?). If the OP meant massage by two persons, which would entail a "four-hand" massage, we might be on to something more interesting. I have not seen a lot of ads for that as standard myself, but I have read where a second masseuse has been in the room as a trainee observer and occasional participant. Never had it done myself either but, as William Shatner once said, I'm sure it would be quite an evening.

See past write ups on "Scarlet".

Looking over the ad on BP going back to early September, the pics over the last six weeks may not be all of the same person. It would be helpful if anyone here could confirm this. There is a thread about her on the other 'ERB that may be worth reading.

What I did not get is, why did he not just park somewhere else and then still come in the front door apr? What does the parking situation on their street have to do with using the front door? Making it sound like where you park determines where you can enter. You can't park in front of the White House either but that does not mean you get to use their service entrance just because it's closer to walk. Seriously, man, what were you thinking?

I recommend Helen at Spring Oriental. Good massage and the rest. They have acupuncture available there too, by the way. Never tried it myself.

I stand by my original comment on the 'reviewer' having no other posts and sounding like an SP speaking of herself. The second post only deepens my suspicion. How many men in this town do you know who address other men as 'boys'?

I have never been to the establishment in question (just making that clear, i.e., I'm neither Eric nor anyone working for him). It seems to me that if you pay for a membership knowing it involves regular fees, you are paying for it regardless of the use you make of it (like any other club or a union for that matter). If you did not let them know you were travelling (for how long?) or that you later became ill, how should they know this and why should they give you a pass on your fees after the fact? Same as when you hire someone to shovel your walk, you don't refuse payment just because it did not snow last month. The person you hired was on call for a whole month and expects to get paid. If you refuse to pay what you owe, you reap what you sow. If you think about it from their point of view you'll see it's so.

If you're of gamer, Pendragon Games could make for a good cover story too. :icon_idea:

I think for someone your age getting into this for the first time she'd be very good. She's sweet, not a clock watcher and she's probably not far off your age by two or three years. I had two good sessions with her about a year ago. She will do kinky and/or porn star if that's what you're into, but I can see her being perfect for a newbie actually. Another possibility, if you feel like spending over the odds to see someone quite young (but often with limited English) would be VIPOTG or Lady Kangam. They are usually in their early 20s.

Now she says no nude pics. I think that's what she meant to say the first time.

In mid December just before a trip to a country in the Caribbean I went for the first time since spring or summer and saw Helen. It's probably been as much a year since I saw her and she noted I'd lost some weight (which is likely true). Went for 45 minutes. Her massage was as good as ever (as usual I touched her legs while she did my back from the front). There was definitely a real improvement in the quality of the finish. I will be returning at some point when it warms up a bit more. As you know it's been very cold lately so she sometimes leaves early if no-one seems likely to visit. She also puts on warm clothes while waiting for customers so looks a bit "casual" and "at home" when you first walk in (she's noticed some potential customers have walked out upon seeing her so attired). As it has been remarked she is not a striking beauty, but neither is she plain; dressed in her uniform she is a fine figure of a woman as far as I am concerned.