Jasmine Rain

For me, I don't want a contact email that says, "Yo! so your down to fuck for $250. Cool. Does that mean I lick your ass too?" However, since part of my screening will be finding out the likes and dislikes of my potiental lover, AFTER we have made with the pleasentries, we can get into some explicit converstation. After all, I have to make sure my lover is going to preform all the naughty things I want to do and I don't think saying " I want to do :69::bddog::bjs::butt::cooter:" is the sexiest way to get the message across. I would think this would come down to common sense, however clearly that is not the case. I do value those who would make such graphic first contact emails/PMs because it at least lets me know I do not have to waste me time with them.

I guess I was just saddened by the fact that women can be so cruel to other women and to a point where now something that is natural and can be sexy is frowned upon. When you see women stick up for each regarding things like mummy tummys as we just saw in the news, how the opposite can be so predominate as well is just sad in my opinion.

I think that both are responsible to be honest. I think it is professional for a companion to carry a variety to ensure the safety of her and her client, but I think that a gentlemen who knows that average is not his size, bringing a couple of condoms that do fit him is the appropriate and responsible thing to do.

I find when these things happen, it is often best to contact customer support for the product. I would also Google or site search the error on their customer website. Modification requirements or trouble shooting are usually not unique to the customer and therefore they may already have the answer listed for you.

I think this is going off topic now. We all know it is both, companionship AND sexual services, that are the main reasons that escorts are sought after. Some enjoy a little more of one over the other, some only want one or the other but a professional in my opinion offers both in hopefully the most respectful and honest way possible. I can not say what happened between the client and the lady. I was not there and while we have two sides, it is truly none of my business. I am not here to tell any companion how to run her business. I may give suggestions, but it is her business, her body. I think that topics like this are helpful and if the lady in question is so new, then reading this may have helped her to know what she can and can not do while remaining professional in this industry but more importantly what she can say no to. No woman should feel they have to follow through with a date for any reason and sadly I fear some women just don't know that when they first start out. Also, I think the OP has learned a value lesson on how to approach this with providers in the future. Gaining knowledge with intelligent conversation can never be a bad thing.

You are not off base at all in my opinion. This is a professional service and just like other professional services, you should be paid for your time. While I understand and can sympathize with the possibilities of the wife wanting a little more assurance before the actual date, this industry does not come with a free consultation and even most professional services don't do the free consultation thing when in demand. Which your business is. A service in demand. There are also other alternatives that the couple has to seek a suitable arrangement that meets their requirements. For example a dating site where they can meet people before hand. There is no need to change your booking policies to suit the comfortably of a couple you do not even know personally. Stick to your guns, and be safe.

My thoughts, I may catch some flak for this but I think if you are offering your time AND your body, it is only proper and professional to tell the client when your monthly appears and give him the respect of choosing what he wants to do. When you do not disclose this information, you are essentially taking away that person's choice and in this manner, their informed consent to sexual services. That is not a risk I am willing to take with someone for the sake of a few bucks. I do wish the OP would have kept in his post the part about taking the money back. Taking that out of the original post seems a little shady in my opinion.

I find it extremely sad as well. I am starting out in this industry fully aware of what I am choosing to do. I am actually choosing this lifestyle of paid companionship because I enjoy sex immensely and wish to continue to have it without being in the confines of a "typical" relationship. I am not interested in a single partner, and I enjoy variety as well as many men I know. While I can go to a bar on the weekends to look for a DTF hook up, I would rather spend a little time getting to know my lovers in a safe way. In a way that allows me to exchange ideas, information details and place a boundary on the distance the companionship will go in the future. Since a monetary amount is exchanged, in my opinion, a boundary is placed on the emotional components that often arise in on going sexual based relationship. This is what I want to do. This is 100% my choice. I have done the research, I know the pros and cons, I am ready and willing. However, that is now all at risk thanks to Peter McKay and the Conservative party. I find it very sad that someone with an opinion (not fact) and in a political position of temporary power (since parties change power all the time) can suppress my sexual freedoms and desires for companionship that work for me and that I am happy with in my life. I find it sad that someone I don't know, did not vote for, and truly wish to never meet, entertain or interact with, gets to set laws prohibiting who can enjoy my body, my fantasies and my sexual needs simply based on whether I get a monetary donation or not.

I was out and about the other day with a girlfriend of mine. She was wear a pair of black tights. They were proper tights, not see through. With a modest shirt. We were hanging out down by the lakefront in our home town. I went to the car for something and on my way back, I heard some moms chatting about camel toes. So I strained my hearing a bit to catch what they were saying. I was curious because it did not seem like standard conversation while watching kids play in a playground. I finally realized they were speaking in disgust about my friend. Calling her a slut and saying some other things like "why she needs to dress that way..." etc. I am sure the smart people here on CERB can get the gist of the conversation. I didn't even know she was sporting one because I guess I don't normally start looking at a woman's covered Vajayjay. She was wearing black and when I did look, I had to do a couple of takes because with her wearing black it was quite hard to even tell. How these ladies saw it is still shocking to me. I never said anything to my friend but I got to thinking. Women are so hard on other women. I think if you ask any man, they love the camel toe. Same with fripples as I have learned they are called here. There appears to be some unwritten rules within women that these are bad. That only slutty girls sport these when in reality most can not control when these wardrobe issues happen. I even threw out a pair of jeans that gave me a camel toe because I just naturally thought it was wrong to wear them. What are your opinions on this subject ladies? I am seriously starting to regret throwing out those jeans because they made my ass look amazing and they were comfortable, stylish and I just really liked them. Do you ladies not buy clothes, or discard clothes that give a camel toe? Is the camel toe really that bad?

I suggest: "The kids are going to love these balloons at the party? Do you know how much water these ones (hold up any box) will hold?" I am just starting out as a sex worker but when buying condoms in my personal life, this would happen as well. I spoke to a manager about it in my local pharmacy. The cashier was an older woman and I think that sex of any kind bothered her. She never made a comment but would always change her customer service towards me once the box was put on the counter. She was very polite and cheery at first, then she would barely speak, barely look at me, never hand me my receipt but instead she just put in the bag, and always took the next customer before I had my stuff together to leave the counter. I think if a cashier ever actually made a rude comment to me, I would stop the line right there and demand a manager. I would not be discrete either. I wouldn't be yelling or creating a huge scene for drama sake but I would be quite assertive to my right to safety and proper customer service instead of rude comments that may discourage people in the future from buying condoms. Married couples have sex with condoms to avoid pregnancy. Married couples may use condoms to avoid the spread of STD that one partner may have. The person at the cash has no idea who you are or why you are buying them and you should have the right to freely purchase a product without scrutiny, rude comments or even dirty looks. Especially when it involved health and safety.

My name is Jessica. I didn't want to go by a different first name. I was speaking with a gentlemen friend and we came up with Rain because I can squirt, so I make it rain. Silly but it works I think. :icon_lol:

Lexi, I am going to agree with you. I have been planning on getting into sex work for quite a few months now. I have finally taken the plunge and am starting to get all my ducks in a row. I was quite concerned about getting myself "out on the market" so to speak before this bill passes as I was concerned about being an unknown provider to potential gentlemen who would normally not have any concern about contacting a new provider. I agree in that I am being paid for my time and companionship as well. With my plans for entering this industry, I have thought about the type of dates I would like to engage in and they are not all sexually oriented either. I am also meeting with a lawyer friend of mine to go over proper wording and package offerings to ensure some added security to my future gentlemen callers, but I am sadden that I even have to do this. The gentlemen I am interested in spending time with will be like minded individuals who share the same interests as me and if they are considered "perverts" then what does that say about me? :wink: I do wish this was not the case, and this bill will be changed, but I am not very hopeful I am afraid. It seems as though some are really pushing for this type of model in our country. If this Bill passes, it will be a sad day in Canada.