xxxAxxx

Wondering if anyone else is experiencing this today: - navigation through pages in the site are causing a "database error" which requires the page to be refreshed. -chat was telling my I was "banned" upon entry, until I figured out it just wanted me to sign-in for some reason? Is the problem on my end, or am I just the first to report these issues? Thanks a bunch-

mmm warm apple pie! Red or Black (in terms of a thong ;))

WINE! Innie or outtie?

Sauna! MMMMM- Boxers or briefs?

Thank you! This was very insightful and informative!

I would let you play with my feet only if you promise to rub them :)

Ok, so because of those mean looking CFM boots I posted in my album, I have received a lot of PMs regarding "trampling" with them. This is not something I have EVER done, but I have been asked many times in years past as well and... I have become more curious about it... I couldn't imagine myself doing it because to be honest, I wouldn't hurt a fly... I'm definitely sub not dom! I guess what I'm curious about it is a)WHY? / HOW? And also, b)Is there not a great risk for injury?? I'd welcome both hobbyists and SPs experiences and/or thoughts on the topic! PM's are fine if you do not wish to publicly address the matter. Thank you!

I'm so glad Devonleigh bumped this thread! I'm back too! Hooray!

I can't stop

just a little

and looks juicy

Has he been with T-girl?

I have a friend who used to do this, I can see if she still does if you like?

I speak only for myself when I say this, but, perhaps calling us "sex workers" is not the best way to make us comfortable. Maybe other SP's agree with me here (or not, who knows?) SERVICE PROVIDER or ESCORT is much better. Don't forget that many SP's view it as selling you their time, not sex. Just food for thought!

I know you're looking for feedback from hobbyists, but as an SP i agree with you 100%. Yes, I will be much more revealing for an incall, hell I can open the door naked if i want to! But for an outcall I do tend to cover up more, but always feminine! Dresses, skirts, at the very least a nice pair of tight blank pants or leggings, depending on the top...The thought of wearing jeans to ANY encounter makes me shudder... Unless of course the jeans were requested ;)

This is the a-sexual I spoke of. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduction Basically, you can view it a "sex-less" organism being neither male nor female. Or perhaps you're a glass is full kind of person who sees that as BOTH male AND female. I'm sure if you're more interested you can look up many debates on the subject. Either way, it knocks itself up and has no need for a partner. Probably where they decided to derive the name from in the type of people in your link. And for the Kinsey scale, what you're basically saying is that my definitions were the most basic and that between every 2 categories like another 3 in augmenting increments to the next? Sounds complicated. :S I'll stick to my simple view a little longer... But can see how others could/do feel about it. Additional Comments: Keep in mind that this is coming from my point of view and is only an honest opinion of my observations! While I can respect you're choice to not label, and can totally understand why you would call yourself sexual, with no prefix....Can you understand how calling you heterosexual didn't work for me? I am not "labelling" anyone, or saying either of us is right/wrong. Please be aware I am only looking to understand your point of view. :)

Those were current definitions. I didn't tell her she was wrong, I said I saw it differently. In fact I asked her to further explain so that I may have some insight as to how others see it. Are you saying that you do not fall into ANY of the above categories? Please explain. And as far as the a-sexual comment goes, I didn't realize any species could impregnate itself other than shrimp. If there are a-sexual people out there, I meant no offense.

If all SP's brought their conscience to work, many married men would not be able to be hobbyists. Just sayin'

To me, this is a man in woman's clothing. I don't see it grey, you were with a man, he was with a woman. What you choose to wear is irrelevant in the terms of your sexual orientation, imo. If he chooses to explore both men and women sexually, to me he is Bi (and acts like a woman, though still a man as long as his penis continues to be functional). If you are active with women only when they have a penis, to me that constitutes bi-curious only. But if you do partake in sexual acts with actual women, then you are bi, not bi-curious. It's all about perspective and how we choose to look at things. I'm not saying that I am right, or that you are wrong; simply stating that we all see things differently and there is no right or wrong answer to this thread as it's all about point of view. Additional Comments: Exactly how I see it too.

I think that: Someone who partakes in sexual acts with both genders is BISEXUAL. Someone who partakes in sexual acts with their own gender ONLY is HOMOSEXUAL. Someone who partakes in sexual acts with the opposite gender ONLY is HETEROSEXUAL. I don't see how this is debatable, to be honest? It seems so black and white to me, no grey areas... I can see how "gay for pay" comes into account and all, but then that becomes an emmy nomiated acting job, not sexual preference. If a person has sex with their own gender, but does not get involved with them in relationships, I still see that as Bi. And those of you who made remarks about it being about the person, not their sexe...That, to me, simply reinforces my statements. You're Bi in my mind, as you like all humans regardless of gender. This is all simply my own humble opinion. ----On a side note---- I have noticed that most people who share my mind frame are hetero (straight), not all heterosexuals feel the way I do on the matter, just saying I've just noticed that majority of like-minded persons tend to be straight. We are all people and personally, that's kind of a label too...In the sense that it's describing what you are. I don't mean to offend anyone by "labelling", but, to be honest; I believe it is just another label like saying "I have 3 labels: Human, Woman, Hetero". Most of my friends are bisexual, male and female alike. They personally don't feel labeled by the term bi and announce it loudly and proudly. The only thing that matters at the end of the day is that YOU know who YOU are and love it. Cheers!

Epic comment.

Exactly! Like I said, if i ever come across a dangerous person, I WILL alert other SP's via the SP-only section. But if we choose not to get involved in providing references that is our business and we have every right to choose so. Kudos to you for speaking out about this, as you can see I had not yet had anyone else of the same mind set on the matter! :) Good to know I'm not alone...

Biggest advice I can lend is to be honest about yourself, your looks and the services you provide. Nothing worse than having a client not be satisfied because he was misled. No matter your bodytype, style or general demeanor, someone out there wants exactly that, so it's important to market yourself to the right people; people who want YOU! Aside from that, just be safe, be smart and be happy! :)

No, I risk my own safety, and so do many other SP's. If I wanted to work as a team I would join an escorting service. For me it's about independence and doing things myself, my way... and let's be honest, you do not get into this line of work thinking it's all sunshine and lollipops. Everyone knows the risks they are willing to take or not take. Feel free to continue to do things your way, I'm not saying it's wrong or that you shouldn't. But you are telling me how I should feel and act. Keep that in mind please. All I asked is to not be brought into any of your business. Afterall, there is an SP only section where we can alert one another of bad encounters. If I ever experience anything worthy of a thread believe me, it will be posted. Beyond that, I have no obligations to you or anyone else, imo.

Please don't take offense to this, as it is not meant to be derogatory towards you...but the answer is no, I would not take my time to help you in your business venture. As mentioned in my previous comment, I do not agree with asking other SP's to do your pre-screening for you (Not YOU in general, just figuratively speaking). I have very limited time for these services as it is, not to mention the amount of time I do waste (as mentioned; the time-wasters ARE out there)...I don't feel comfortable sharing any information with you nor taking the time out of my day to assist you in gaining a client. It is your choice to perform this pre-check, as is your right and personal preference, but I do agree with the post by withpassion in regards to its nature being that ANY one else can take the risk for you. Sadly, that is the way I feel on the matter. I'm sure there is no lack of other SP's who are willing to share information with you, I am simply not one of them.