Cjthomas
General Member-
Content Count
116 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Cjthomas last won the day on January 3 2025
Cjthomas had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
1634 ExcellentAbout Cjthomas
-
Rank
General Member
Personal Information
-
Gender
n/a
-
Location
Halifax Toronto Edmonton
Recent Profile Visitors
3914 profile views
-
Brooklyn B 4601 - around for a while but no reviews?
Cjthomas replied to cptslow's topic in Escort Discussion for Nova Scotia
Mikey I agree with most of your reply. Although I have yet to understand the amount of talk that is shared among some of us. You”d think that some of us have nothing to do other than talk about the providers we visit. I will no longer share details about my visits and I don’t feel the need to discuss with anyone my feelings concerning any provider. I hope those I see offer me the same respect -
Brooklyn B 4601 - around for a while but no reviews?
Cjthomas replied to cptslow's topic in Escort Discussion for Nova Scotia
I can’t speak for most but after reading numerous posts which lean blame towards the provider when service is said to be lackluster or vanilla, I’ll disagree that there is a general understanding of ymmv. What I take issue with is that making such comments can possibly cause a safe to see and real provider a detrimental loss in their business or reputation . All over something as benign as incompatibility. Why not just move on? Dangerous people should be called out but people who are providing a service as advertised need not be. -
Cjthomas started following Florence French, Brooklyn B 4601 - around for a while but no reviews?, Contact and and 6 others
-
Brooklyn B 4601 - around for a while but no reviews?
Cjthomas replied to cptslow's topic in Escort Discussion for Nova Scotia
Apparently there needs to be more discussion concerning what ymmv actually means. Even repeat encounters with a favourite regular provider can be lackluster. Lots of reasons for a lackluster session. Some of which can be attributed to something we the client did or didnt do. We should consider that before coming here to complain that a provider wasn’t as great as someone else found her to be. I also find it annoying when it’s assumed that because a provider hasn’t any reviews or any recent reviews that we should be dubious of them. Not every provider wants to be reviewed and most established providers don’t need new ones to affirm their professionalism or legitimacy. So many here have been hobbying and members for many years and yet continue to ignore the basics of this industry and common sense. -
And yet here you are, again! Let me caution you Lemmy Caution. Once you are on the web you are not anonymous. Anyone with the right amount of experience can find you if they truly wanted to. The few of you who keep trying to impress upon others that you’ve some how protected yourselves by contacting escorts who don’t screen while posting here under your pseudonyms is laughable. What I don’t understand is your irreverence towards those who screen and your constant need to come here to tell everyone why you won’t see those escorts. Why not just hire who you prefer and go about your day. Some of you are starting to sound like paranoid, petty jerks who can’t stand seeing women having the ability and right to run their business as they see fit.
-
When was the last time one of us hobbyists from this board was outed? Over the past numbers of months at least a half dozen times I’ve read posts in which the providers incall location was posted. I’ll continue to trust those providers who screen. You can continue to choose those who don’t. It’s called choice. No one is arguing that. Yet the implications that our id or other information is compromised in the hands of a reputable provider has to stop and before Steve comes at me again to call me me a simp or that I’m hoping to get free pussy. Let me say that I am here because I enjoy hiring beautiful women and paying for their time. Maybe Steve should do that more and stop watching so many Andrew Tate videos
-
My best might not be the next guys so would it really be helpful posting their names? This is different than a recommendation and if you have a few different names being mentioned as the best do you then post asking which of that group wins the title? This is why I find these best of threads pointless and somewhat insulting. It’s also interesting that these recent best of threads are all started by very new members who after positing them don’t participate further.
-
Well this explains a lot. Might be a good idea to seek some help for that drinking problem
-
Some of the grifters here will never understand that. Any provider who is authentic will have good and bad experiences. Some of us are understanding to that. Others will find the need to come here and cry about it while laying the blame solely on the provider.
-
Why do some of you always have to shit on someone’s recommendation just because you see it differently. If you don’t like or agree with someone’s opinion of another providers looks how about you just don’t see them and keep your mouths shut. We most certainly are all entitled to our opinion but that doesn’t mean it requires posting. This is supposed to be a positive board. A board that encourages recommendations and which has a slogan “if you have nothing nice to say say nothing at all”. Try saying nothing at all for a change!
-
In town Jan 24-25 -- advice from Hfx vets?
Cjthomas replied to snapperglubb's topic in Escort Discussion for Nova Scotia
I’ve had great success with tryst. There are some wonderful ladies that post there that aren’t on here. There are also some ladies here that don’t post on there. Best of luck with your search. -
Does she know? A well respected active member of this board messaged me. Within that message was some very concerning information about you. Do the ladies a favor and leave them alone.
-
I’m sure she won’t mind
-
It’s been said a number of times by reputable people here that Lyla is owned by Leolist or vice versa. So I’m curious as to how that makes one site better than the other? Especially with the amount of nonsense that’s written on this site. Outing providers in call locations, childish insults, judgements towards services, and other things said here which shouldn’t be allowed. Instead I would recommend looking at social media when wanting to know about a particular provider. Rather than relying on any sites credibility since they’re all flawed and following the other steps you’ve included. I’d also recommend if the provider allows it speak to them directly. Doing so has never failed me.
-
Anyone see Sonia Dubois before?
Cjthomas replied to AdamSandler's topic in Escort Discussion for Nova Scotia
If? I’ll take her word for it. I’ll also support her posting wherever she sees fit. just as you seem to do. Ignore what you dislike and unless you’re a mod it’s not your place to tell anyone where or what to post. -
Anyone see Sonia Dubois before?
Cjthomas replied to AdamSandler's topic in Escort Discussion for Nova Scotia
Maybe read the last post she posted. She said she suspected the person harassing her to be someone from here. I know it’s not on par with what you like to post and read but she has every right to post here if she chooses. I’d like the redundant “have you seen” threads to fade away but we all can’t get what we want.