Gregsand

Oklahoma! (1955) A musical with many now classical songs like "Oh What a Beautiful Morning".

Mac and Me(1988 ) A horrible knock-off of "E.T." with one of the most infamous product placement in movie history.

Rules are only good if applied. And as we seen since Pence accepted the position, his strong Christian values and evangelical principles have been flexible enough to tie a noose around his neck. Something that will seriously haunt him if Trump is impeached. A man willing to step on his own integrity for power, will throw everyone under the bus including his own family. Better having no rules with a healthy lifestyle, than looking like an hypocrite by violating your own principles.

Met her once over a year ago. She's a mature clean plus size lady with nice soft skin, large breasts and hosts in a small clean apartment. Her English is a bit limited with a thick Asian accent, but written communications are much better. Her massage skills are soft and basic but still quite relaxing. The choice of finishing touch varies from hj to fs and her rates are quite reasonable. If you're fine with her description, you'll likely enjoy her company.

Gamera(1965 to 2006 franchise) The Japanese giant monster turtle and friend to all children in the world.

With people losing interest in printed media, it makes your suggestion pretty outdated. Also, with Photoshop it's quite easy(for someone experienced with the software) to edit a newspaper front page on a picture. There's no magic foolproof solutions other than doing a quick Google search and reverse look-up to see if someone's legit or not. Or just use websites like LYLA instead of BP and CL.

When you thread the limits of serious physical violence, it would be a situation where having a third person in the room can be useful to monitor the activity and intervene if needed. And mostly when both sides are exploring their physical limits.

Does it include your bush , if any? :-)

There plenty of SP's specialized in BDSM, it's a question of finding one who knows what she's doing. Trust and good communication is essential to avoid dangerous or/and expensive legal consequences.

There's already a thread called: "How Low Can They Go?" for people who feel the need to vent about politics South of the border. http://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=258236 And I think one thread about it is more than enough. Well that's my "two cents" about it. Take care.

Something I already addressed in another thread is the abusive use of picture editing. I'm ok when the purpose is to blur the face or distinctive features like tattoos in order to protect someone's identity. But not when the goal is to hide aging signs, uneven skin tone and scars. This kind of editing is as deceptive as fake and outdated pictures. Again, rather see an honest vague description than deceptive/fake pictures.

Only when not bolted on the room ceiling.

I agree with most of your arguments. But you got to keep in mind we're talking about a man who never accepted the legitimacy of his predecessor on the ground of a repeatedly debunked racist conspiracy theory. A man who called the popular vote the only true measure of victory. And a man who couldn't tell the truth even if his life depended on it. He takes credit to the success of measures taken by the previous administration and won't take responsibility on failures he put his signature on. He regularly sympathizes with white nationalist and will personally attack everyone who dares questioning him. He repeatedly violated his oath to represent the U.S. population and protect their rights. Even controversial predecessors like Nixon and W.Bush could unite the country and represent all of them in moments of crisis. Trump can't even honor native veterans without insulting them with a racial slur. Yes he won. But according to his own words, he's not worthy of the position and to represent his country. He made the history book , great for him. If he really cares about his country and the population, he will allow someone who gives a crap to take over. As for the "anti-Hillary" thing, I take it with a grain of salt. She made her share of mistakes, but the fake news on her jumped the shark with conspiracy theories including "Pizzagate", satanic rituals, fake campaign rallies and many others. As for Sanders, he was popular but you can't expect a nation built on capitalism to turn socialist on a dime. If Sanders was serious about it he would have run as an independent instead of trying to hijack the Democratic party the same way Trump did with the Republicans. Sanders only wanted to create a dialogue and the impact was greatly overhyped. The fact Clinton managed to win the popular vote by nearly 3 million says it all. No hard feelings. Enjoy the rest of the day. :-)

Trump's former National Security Advisor just plead guilty to lying to the FBI. Can't be more straight forward than that. Have a nice weekend.

Not having log in problems. But in the past 48hours , many links on the site are reduced to a black x in a box with the capture "undefined".

If people need a tutorial on how to do in the shower without drowning, it should be a solid hint they should stick with vanilla things like missionary on dry land. LOL

Two words: DUMPSTER FIRE.

Ok, On a serious note is when I go to an incall location where several ladies work and the privacy is questionable. I don't mind seeing other women there, but don't like seeing some of the other lobbyists present and for them to see me. Only happened once, but was enough to keep me away from this type of establishment.

It kind of crosses the line when people are starting to root for the local child molester.

Love the first hug and kiss on the first session. ;-)

With three ladies taking it the wrong way, it felt necessary to clarify things. Here another topic: Ladies stuck in a "time-warp". When a lady only ages two years in the span of a decade it looks a bit weird. Yes some women look younger. But better being honest and get told they look younger than hear the opposite. With the demand for mature ladies, not sure why those lies are still necessary.

I wasn't looking to create a debate or generalise the problem, but just saying that some ladies are not very forthcoming with basic information lobbyist normally want to know. I know it's not much of a problem here, but on CL and BP, I seen it all. When the most precise answer is "I'm average", it doesn't raise my enthusiasm very much. And again, it's not a widespread problem , just a situation I sadly seen more than once.

As I mentioned in my original comment, I was asking for the basics like description, services and rates. Most ladies will provide all of it in the first reply, but some will literally make me ask for each detail one by one or be as vague as possible. Making a long exchange for something that could have been summed up in a single short email or in under 30 sec on the phone.

My point was simply that while trying to find the next diamond in the rough, some new ladies are not always generous in regard to sharing information about themselves. When the process takes much longer than it should, I don't tend to waste too much time on it. It's a situation I seen more than once and shared it because it's relevant to the topic.

Again, when that's the case it's not an issue. I was referring to when some ladies give little to no information on their ads and I got to contact them via phone, text or email to get details. I know how to do research, but when you got little to work with, it gets frustrating.