Gregsand

For me, I like when the end result is a natural and proportional look(no matter if enhanced, reduced or reconstructed). What I don't like, is the "bimbo" overkill look often seen in strippers and porn stars in the 80's and 90's. It used to be a good investment for ladies working in the adult industry, but not sure it's the same today.

Not really. She sounds like the type who regularly changes name, pictures and don't care about building a good reputation. Unless someone can provide a functional link with real info and pictures, the most helpful advice remains to NOT pay someone who uses fake pictures.

Dumb question from an SP after I paid: "I'm having my period, does that bother you?" I think I already mentioned this in another thread, but that time I gave her the option of giving me my money back and get out or cut it to a 30 min session at a much lower rate. She took the latter.

I don't want to reply for her, but as she was replying to my comment I think she just added to my argument about focusing on positive ads and SP's instead of going on a witch hunt. I agree that meeting new ladies and "taking one for the team" is good and healthy thing for the industry. But considering the person who started the conversation actually paid one of the "fakers", we shouldn't be surprised this thread went off the rail. LOL

"hidden gems" don't lie. Doesn't matter if it comes from BP, CL, Kijiji or other websites, if ads and ladies behind are honest, they will deserve the visibility and attention. Focusing on the negative only brings more of it.

Your boner lead you into a mediocre overpriced experience. This is what happens when you enable a BS artists. If that lady was honest she wouldn't have used fake pics. Don't make us cry because you used your dick instead of your brain. I am a man. And when something stinks I walk away!

If you want to do this go ahead, but don't expect a medal out of it. Cowboy Kenny had a website dedicated to that and he had to quit because it was a waste of time and an exercise in futility. Better focus on real honest women, than waste your time on those who don't deserve the visibility and attention.

I actually enjoy that movie a lot. It's a very accurate adaptation of the graphic novel and visually stunning. Even if the ending was slightly different from the source material, it reached the same conclusion. But if you watched that movie dry expecting a traditional family friendly superhero movie, I can certainly understand why you were so turned off by it. I remember seeing a few families walking out, when watching it in theater. It was clearly written 18 ADULT on the ticket and I seriously questioned the judgement of parents bringing a 10yo kid to see this. If you took the time to read the source material or watch the "motion comic" version released in 2008 you would likely see this movie in a better eye. But if movies with social comment are not your cup of tea, I completely understand. Movies I hate are the Jason Friedberg, Aaron Seltzer spoof movies like "Meet the Spartans", "Epic Movie" and "Disaster Movie" to name a few. These two idiots literally killed a movie genre. The first "Scary Movie" was actually good, but what followed was a series of unfunny shipwrecks. And I think the same can be said about Adam Sandler movies. With the exception of the "Hotel Transylvania" movies, seriously WTF happened?

The funny thing is for a long time I didn't even knew Bridgehead was a coffee shop/restaurant. With the minimalistic marketing and exterior looks, I always thought it was an outdoor clothing store. So by default my answer is gonna be Starbucks. In the spirit of Halloween, slasher or thriller movies?

In the past days I received a few private messages asking me to recommend some open minded therapists. For clarity, I'll repeat here what I wrote to them: Massage therapists will only open up to men(or woman) they feel comfortable with. It's not because one opened to me or someone else, they will instantly do the same with everybody. Discretion is essential. So, what happens between a therapist and client/friend should remain private to avoid burning her, her career and your reputation as a lobbyist. Think of her as a woman and not as an escort. And the same should be said about all women offering adult services. Respect and privacy goes a long way and can make the difference between receiving the bare minimal and a unique out of this world experience between two consenting adults. Hope the message is clear and I won't need to come back on this. Thank you.

"I touch myself" by Divinyls would also be appropriate for that. LOL Additional Comments: But seriously the best song for raw sex is "Closer" by Nine Inch Nails.

When I first noticed this thread what popped in my mind was not my first experience, but the first act of the 1983 movie "Risky Business" with Tom Cruise meeting "Jackie". This scene pretty much serves as a template for bad first experiences. Enjoy.

A wise horny man once said: #giggity

Like a few here already mentioned here, not every ladies enjoys the visibility. And mostly not if the goal is a little extra income without making a career out of it. Some prefer keeping a few regulars, than a long list of men they barely got time to see. This is particularly the case with MA's who only offer FS to hobbyists with who they share a certain chemistry. So, an honest and positive review can become a bit misleading if the full experience is limited to only a few select men. When I read a review I pay more attention to the work environment and logistics than the experience itself. Everyone has their unique taste in women(or men) and different kinks. A bad experience for one can be great for another and vice versa. For me, I want to know if she's legit and has a clean place. For the rest, I prefer going blind and enjoy the surprise. High expectations dont often payoff.

Welcome aboard, Looking forward to see more about you. That ass looks good .:-)

What's the last thing that goes through a bug's mind when it hits a windshield at 70mph? ...... his asshole!

"Don't be a Trump" also works.

"no restrictions" doesn't equal "bbfs". This was even a thread topic: http://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=65845 While opinions vary, the consensus seems to be that health/life saving protections are NOT considered a restriction.

I've been with two and as long we kept the kinky stuff out of their workplace they were not losing much sleep about it.

People are entitled to a private life, no matter what they do. If they want a relationship, they'll find a way to make it happen and keep it low profile. People can sometimes act like adults.

Not much into horror, but love "Army of Darkness" and the two first "Alien" movies.

I would seriously question the effectiveness of that type of screening. I seen SP's and MA's wait to be behind closed door before offering certain options as they tend to vary depending on the comfort level with the client. Also, while the question and answer may reassure the hobbyist, the lady may not fell the same way about it. And like Harley mentioned, it will likely just burn you.

I normally stick with first names. But in a business based on discretion, it's sometimes hard to keep track of as many women work under several names. For me , the best compliment is when I can make her scream the name of her bf or lover. One time was particularly funny as she apologized after the fact.

Depends on the circumstances. If I never met her before and she accepts, it's definitely a red flag. But if I met her a few times before, it's more likely she wants to make it an arrangement.

I understand your frustration. But the reason some men ask, is because some ladies are open to negotiation and UNSAFE OFFERINGS is sadly not as rare it should be. Both sides need to share the blame.