Gregsand

Yes, you're not the first to raise that argument. Thank you.

Again, I agree. The purpose of the thread was simply to know the reasons behind the "No black gents" and not to make judgement. But when I read some ads with more restrictions than actual details about the service and ladies, I lose interest in all the negativity. But again if a provider finds enough regulars to make ends meet, good for her. I was simply curious about the question and already received more than enough answers. It's not even a serious pet-peeve for me. I got more problems with SP's using dating websites to advertise than their racial profiling. But that could be a topic for another thread. Thank you and Take care.

Again , I fully agree with you and all reasons you mention are valid. But not all providers are "well marketed". Not always their fault as some sadly rely on procurers who use the lazy/deceptive way to promote them. I'm not pretending to know everything about this industry, but I understand enough of the inner workings to see the difference between someone who can do well and those who won't. Additional Comments: Not everything as to do with racism. Like you said yourself, the black client pool in the region is not that big.

Don't get me wrong, I fully agree with you. But as we can often read on this board, some SP and MA are not doing as good. And after making bad judgement calls, some got to play catch up and try to capitalize on 10, 15 and even 20 yo pictures and attempt to profit from their former selves. Even if this forum focuses on the positive sides, some things can't be hidden.

Not everyone age the same way. Some still look very good in their late 40's early 50's, but it's far from the norm. As for my definition of "unjustified", it's when someone relies on myths and prejudices and not on facts. In this and other related threads I seen plenty of justified reasons for the discrimination, but not everyone are that clear on their personal reasons. Doesn't really matter to me, they're simply hurting themselves.

My point was simply that youth, beauty, wealth and health doesn't last forever. Obviously this doesn't apply to young women who do this temporarily to pay their student loan. But for those who make a career out of it and build a nice little retirement fund, every dollars should count. Unjustified racist prejudices will cost them in the long run.

Considering a pornstar like Tracy Lord was able to make 50+ movies while underage, I don't think "been reviewed" is considered a guarantee of legality. It simply means you're not the first. Additional Comments: Sadly too many men just ignore the situation. They pay for a young woman and ignore the possibility. When caught they claim ignorance even if all the red flags were there and quite obvious.

Not sure if a taboo subject or was discussed before, but it's a known fact not everyone look their age. Some 15-16yo look like woman early 20's and some mid-20's look like teenagers. So when meeting SP's and MA's in the 18-23 age bracket it's not unusual to question the age of the young woman. And as many SP's only carry the minimum on themselves, more than once was shown a questionnable student ID likely made by someone with a printer and laminator. The way I dealt with it, if I already had other issues with the young woman's appearance, hygiene or state of mind/sobriety I would use the age thing as a way out. But if she was clean and attractive, would have a good 10 min conversation to see her maturity. And if she could sell me the fact she's been in college/CEGEP for a year or was a mature well balances young woman I would deal with her. If not, I would go for the door. Anyone else dealt with a similar situation?

Sadly the faith of a TV show is determined by ratings and not potential. The movie was actually more successful than the series. Many didn't like the decision of rebooting the story instead of make it a direct continuation of the movie.

Karine Vanasse, Jewel Staite, Yvonne Strahovski and Emma Watson

As long he got good hands and knows what he's doing, the rest doesn't really matter.

Would be a "Shyamalan" twist if she was a member of this board and discovered the faith of your relationship was being dealt publicly. That would crank the awkwardness level to 11. 54 years of "General Hospital" and 44 years of "The Young and the Restless" couldn't contain all the drama.

And if all fails, there always banana bread, Haagen-Dazs and Dr. Phil.

I agree with Rocky on this. This relationship speed bump should be dealt privately with an honest conversation. If that's the only lie and there's no actual signs of cheating, you two should be able to work this out. But if far more skeletons are discovered, then you may have more good reasons to end the relationship.

The most important thing is her ability to separate work from her personal life. I met many SP, MA and dancers with who had a bf. And most told me some of their restrictions had more to do with respect for them, than anything else. Like one would never kiss or do anal with a client, because this was exclusively for someone she was in a relationship with. But like I already mentioned in another thread, when the relationship goes south who ever is on that bed or table can end up with a little more love than bargained for. But again if she's a straight therapist, you can dismiss all of it as she's more a health worker than an adult entertainer.

Depends on what kind of MA she is. If she only give straight therapeutic massages, I call it a non issue. But if she gives "happy" extras, yes it would make it a little awkward.

Highly doubt it. The pictures are from a British fetish model named Electra Morgan. And the phone number is linked to ads in Fredericton with picture of a different woman: http://backpage.com.newbrunswick.escortbabylon.com/post/13387178/# Would not recommend that person.

Legit therapists and RMT's obviously want to draw a clear line between their services and what SP's/rub-n-tugs offer. This is done to protect their reputation on a professional level and also for their safety in order to avoid the wrong clients knocking at the door. That being said, they are human beings and not made of wood. So, what happens "off the clock" is there own business. As long they separate work from pleasure/relationships, everything is A-OK.

Yes and the Google image search tool also does the job. But as already mentioned, not all searches will be conclusive. And some people will care more about other criteria's than the actual picture. I started seeing SP's in the early 90's and relied on newspaper ads and a quick descriptions on the phone. And to be honest, things were not so different. Some SP's and procurers would be very honest and some not at all. When dealing with fresh new providers we can't always rely on references and reviews. To discover the next "diamond in the rough" you often need to meet in person and see if it's worth it.

Ok.... Now you made it weird. LOL

I think we all got the idea of what you meant. I don't think the grammar police ventured here in a while.

Like sport girls like Maria Sharapova, Eugenie Bouchard, Michelle Jenneke and Allison Stokke.

Yes, doing your homework is the best solution. But sometimes you can't find anything conclusive and got to trust her and take a chance. And I understand things get muddy when procurers are involved as those SP's got little control on the pictures and stats used to describe them. But again, one shouldn't pay for someone else's deception. Going along with it just make things worst.

Without hijacking this thread, I'm a bit curious if the subject of male MA's and SP's is taboo on this forum. I don't consider myself bi, but if a male MA can sell me well the benefits of his services, I would certainly be curious enough to try it. But since I joined this forum 6 months ago I didn't see many discussions about male providers. Is this the wrong message board for type of subject?