SamIsDTF

AI analysis of this thread: Analyzing personalities and motivations I’m trying to identify the personalities and motivations of different forum posters. OP seems polite, focuses on rational discussion, and is likely trying to vet a provider. Sonia, on the other hand, comes across as defensive and cynical, motivated by protecting her brand and ensuring high-paying clients. SamIsDTF is analytical, probably suspicious of "shills", and protective of the community. Others like Njosnavelin show empathy, while NewGuy_411 appears on the fence, seeking mutual respect. SincereSerenade’s also defensive, potentially a client, and looks polite but might be misjudged. Thought for 16 seconds Below is a read‑between‑the‑lines portrait of the main voices in the two‑page thread. (Citations point to the exact forum snippets that informed each observation.) Poster Communication style Likely personality traits What seems to motivate them AdamSandler (thread starter, Halifax hobbyist) Polite opener asking for info; later tries to mediate when things heat up, clarifies he isn’t “sabotaging” Sonia’s tour and acknowledges one positive report • Pragmatic vetter • Values civility • Slightly risk‑averse Wants enough firsthand data to justify handing over his ID + $$. Also wants the local board to stay constructive, not a flame‑war — hence repeated efforts to calm the thread. NewGuy_411 (new hobbyist) Welcomes DMs, later calls Sonia’s forum tone a “very bad look” and asks for “respect and kindness on both sides” • Optimistic newcomer • Sensitive to courtesy signals Trying to gauge “vibe fit” before spending money; equates an escort’s online demeanor with probable session chemistry. Njosnavelin Defends Sonia’s right to be “short” when her no‑review rule is ignored, frames the pushback as boundary‑respect • Empathetic • Boundary‑focused Likely sees himself as an ally to providers; wants hobbyists to remember escorts’ safety concerns and emotional labour. SamIsDTF Runs an AI stylometry test, posts a 500‑word forensic breakdown claiming an 85‑95 % chance a glowing review is “self‑written” • Methodical skeptic • Enjoys “detective” role • High need for community credibility Protecting the board’s information ecosystem: fake shills can distort market signals. Also relishes the intellectual exercise. SincereSerenade (brand‑new account accused of being shill) Calm rebuttal: “people can use AI to proof their writing… I’m just trying to help” • Defensive but courteous • Possibly genuine first‑time reviewer Either an earnest rookie who liked Sonia and feels wrongly accused, or (if Sam is right) Sonia’s attempt at guerrilla marketing. In either case the motivation is to salvage the credibility of the positive post. Sonia DuBois (touring escort) Long, detailed narrative of Winnipeg “psycho client,” blunt language (“paranoid af,” “retartedly ran away”); frames hobbyists’ scrutiny as sabotage by local competitors; cites her €500 rate & full calendar as proof of legitimacy • Highly assertive • Direct, no‑nonsense (may read as combative) • Protective of autonomy & brand 1️⃣ Safety control: public reviews can expose address/personal details. 2️⃣ Reputation management: she fears a single bad‑faith review will cost tours. 3️⃣ Economic leverage: keeps no‑review policy to maintain upscale mystique and discourage bargain‑hunters who “spend hours researching people ‘maybe this maybe that’ instead of just booking.” Thread dynamic overall Hobbyist side is split between due‑diligence vets (Adam, Sam) and provider‑empathy voices (Njosnavelin). Sonia perceives both as time‑wasters who probably won’t book. Accusations of sock‑puppeting escalate mistrust, while Sonia’s blunt rebuttals amplify hobbyists’ caution. The clash is classic “review‑culture vs. privacy‑culture.” Hobbyists want reassurance and community accountability; Sonia wants unilateral control over her narrative. Both see the other’s norm‑set as threatening their economic or emotional safety. In short: Adam & NewGuy value civility and reliable intel. Sam values crowd‑sourced truth and enjoys the sleuth role. Njosnavelin prioritises respect for sex‑workers’ boundaries. Sonia prioritises autonomy, feels embattled, and argues that Halifax’s small‑market economics force her onto boards she dislikes. SincereSerenade is either a genuine satisfied client or a marketing move; either way the reaction shows how low‑post‑count praise is distrusted. Understanding these motivations helps explain why the thread spirals: everyone is talking about trust—but each group defines trust differently.

We try to discern the most we can from the information available, before we decide to engage with an SP. Just as you do by requiring a photo ID and references.

Long overdue but I highly recommend Bella. Super down to earth and charming. Her place is clean and safe. As others have said, not FS, but one of the best GFE experiences out there. She said she used to do FS, and all I can say is, if only I could go back in time to when she did, lol. If I were her, I’d offer FS to long time clients for some very high rate (whatever would make it worth it to her). I bet she’d get a few takers and would make bank. And for a long time client, what an experience that would be after the wait! Her pictures don’t look as good as she does in person. She has one of those bodies that isn’t as photogenic I guess. Not that they’re bad photos, but she’s just better in person. Oh, and unlike some others, she definitely seems to be in her early/mid twenties. Let me put it this way, she’s sugar baby material. If I thought I could match what she’s already making I’d love to snatch her up all for myself, 😉

I would note a few more things. First, as of this writing, both that poster and Sonia have the exact same last login time (rounded to the hour). That post is also inconsistent with what I was messaged from a trusted user. I went ahead and loaded that post, along with testimonials from her site, her self description on another site, and her post above, into an AI model. It says the following (note, I mean no offense to anyone, but I am interested in making sure both SP’s and clients have a safe and enjoyable experience): Stylistic & Structural Comparison 1. Grammar & Punctuation The second forum post is grammatically clean, uses polished punctuation, complete sentences, and avoids casual errors. This aligns with Sonia’s self-description and testimonials, but not with the first forum post, which has many grammar and spelling issues. Inference: The second forum post matches Sonia’s edited voice, not her raw voice. If she wrote it, she was being careful and intentional. 2. Tone & Vocabulary The second forum post uses phrases like: “Attentive and invested” “Health and hygiene seriously” “Time was about ME” “A caring girlfriend” “Respect goes both ways” These match closely with wording and themes in Sonia’s self-description and testimonials, which emphasize: Attentiveness Connection and communication Mutual respect Cleanliness, professionalism, boundaries Inference: The voice in the second forum post sounds suspiciously like Sonia writing in the role of a client, echoing exactly the brand values and buzzwords from her own marketing language. 3. Self-Promotion Consistency The second forum post makes a targeted defense against possible criticisms (re: age, appearance, being “rude”). It also contains “planted” clarifications about the experience being consensual, warm, and client-focused — while explicitly saying “any negative experience… would only be due to them not respecting her boundaries.” This directly mirrors the first forum post’s core defense: that bad reviews result from boundary violations, and that she shouldn’t be judged by those. Inference: The message structure in the second forum post supports her business narrative, rather than feeling like an independently motivated client reflection. 4. Subtle Tells One phrase stands out in the second post: “Of course I’m not naive and I know there’s a certain level of acting involved…” This level of detachment and awareness is unusual for a client post and mirrors Sonia’s own nuanced, intellectual tone from her bio. Additionally, note the oddly detailed age comment: “I would say that she lots a bit of weight since she’s taken her pictures…” This sort of phrasing is more likely to come from someone talking about themselves indirectly. Conclusion: High Likelihood of Self-Written Post With all of the above in mind, and under the assumption that Sonia wrote both the bio and the first forum post: It is very likely — bordering on certain — that the second forum post was written by Sonia DuBois herself, posing as a client. The writing matches her curated voice. The themes, vocabulary, structure, and messaging are aligned with her brand. It addresses known criticisms and reinforces her preferred narrative. Probability estimate (if useful): 85–95% chance the second forum post is not a real client review, but a self-authored defense disguised as one.

A few things I’ve found. First, I would note that she’s been a member here since 2016. Second, I found an old ad of hers where she says she’s “moving to Berlin March 1, 2018” which uses almost all of the same pictures from her most recent ad. That ad from 2018 listed her age as 32. Third, there are a scattering of posts from her or taking about her on other forums. I would encourage others to google “Sonia Dubois escort” and read through them to get a sense of her personality (at least how she comes across on the internet). I am genuinely curious to hear from someone who has first hand (in person) experience with her. Please PM me. I promise not to reveal any details publicly so as to “out” you as the source. I hope everyone stays happy and healthy. And remember folks, giving out your PII details to a stranger on the internet is always a risk. Even if they are in a good space now and genuinely believe they would never share that information publicly, that might not always be the case. And once it’s out there, it’s out there.

She is real. I've seen her several times. Pictures are accurate. She is a young, tall, slim brunette. She seemed to enjoy our interactions which is always a plus. Would recommend.

I PM’d you. Based on past experience I think anything I say publicly will be removed by mods.

I’ve subbed (for free) to several. I just take a screenshot of their LL ad and send it to them via OF message, because they’re obviously lying to get that OF $$ with no intention to ever meet IRL.

I saw Hannah the other day. Her pics are real and she is legit. However, I would not go back.

https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/nova-scotia/halifax_just_arrived_halifax_short_part_time_sexy_wil-9226440 Classic bait and switch. As of this posting she is in a house (38) in the Clayton Park area. She was a 5 minute drive away so I went to see her. Left at the door. Obviously different than pictures. She was Asian, possibly early 30s. What is fascinating to me is how often the woman at the door isn’t entirely unattractive, but clearly different than the pictures. Why don’t they just post their own pictures and be honest? She likely wouldn’t attract the same # of people but she also wouldn’t have people leaving at the door and posting negative reviews. Can’t speak to the services she offers.

I never meet with Asian ads because I assume they are either bait/switch, scams, or the girls are here due to some sort of trafficking/coersion.

She would reach out to me periodically, but a few weeks ago we chatted and she mentioned that she didn’t know when she would be available again. I recently reached out to her to ask how she was doing and she hasn’t responded. Adding that she hasn’t posted an ad since that time, I don’t think she’s actively seeing people right now. Keep an eye out for her ad. That’ll be your indication.

Ok. I’m in my 30s and in reasonably good shape. Certainly capable of attracting a woman in her late 20’s /early 30’s, and if we coupled onlookers wouldn’t bat an eye. When I pay for companionship, I want to partake in an aesthetic that is less frequently available to me than it once was, and want to do so without having to be a player or lie to the woman. I am just not interested in a woman who is much older because if I wanted that I’d go to a bar and get it for free. That perhaps explains our difference of opinion.

How old are you?

She is legit. Offers her services out of her apartment. All safe, no bare, including no mouth kissing. She is young (in her 20’s). She has a cute face. She appears to have lost a decent amount of weight as she has stretch marks and loose skin which is apparent in her pictures but even more so (and less flattering) in person. But for the right client, perhaps someone with their own body insecurity issues, this could be a blessing. Not recommended for folks who like a tight body and petite frame. There are better SP’s out there who charge less for more. But she was kind and certainly not someone I would warn against.

No “water works” and she appears to be in her mid-20s.

https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/nova-scotia/halifax_in_call_only_available_all_night_come_see_the_water_show-9218406 Saw her this evening. Apparently she’s new to the province and just getting started here. Photos are real, and based on what I saw in person are recent. She did ask for a photo during our text exchange but was ok with a basic description instead. She is a tall and slender brunette. Very attractive. She was also incredibly responsive as well. Overall an amazing experience, 10/10 would highly recommend, but YMMV.

Definitely a legit provider. My recommendation would be to google her handle + manyvids. She has some videos out there with another SP that provide the most accurate visuals.

I am inclined to disagree with others here. Saying “age is just a number” misses the point of disclosing age in the first place. If an SP wants to exclude age from their ad, letting their *real* pictures do the talking, that’s one thing. But to lie about your age misleads your clients. If I’m looking for an SP in her 20’s, I’m doing so because I desire a particular aesthetic that is statistically more likely of women in their 20’s. Same if I seek a woman in her 30’s, and so on. Rounding down to the nearest 0/5 is acceptable. A 30yo can claim she’s 27 or 28. Fine. But I’ve seen ads for several well known SP’s that, upon some investigation, reveal they are really rounding down. For example, one SP claims to be 30 but has reviews from 2012, and while her photos could be of a 30 yo, if you search the net her videos suggest a woman in her late 30s. There are also obvious frauds who are many decades over their advertised age, and their malfeasance isn’t even up for debate. Nothing wrong with any age or body type. Sometimes I want to spend time with a woman my age or slightly older (mid-30s to early-40s). Sometimes tall, sometimes curvy, sometimes busty, sometimes petite. But when I want to spend time with a younger woman in her early to mid 20’s I’d really appreciate not having to be Sherlock Holmes to figure it out. And I really hate going through the trouble of arranging a meeting, only to have to leave at the door. That isn’t great for anyone. That said, I’m not naive. I understand that many will end up staying anyways, and false advertising gets clients to the door. I don’t expect this behavior to change.

I reached out to her maybe 2 or 3 times a month or so ago, asking about her availability and where she was hosting. Due to logistical issues I didn’t book with her. The last time I reached out she responded hostilely, accusing me of being a time waster and insulted me. This seems to track with what others have said.

Met with her a few years ago at her place in Dartmouth, and left immediately. Pictures aren’t her. She is at least in her 50’s. 0/10 would not recommend.

I have seen her several times. From my perspective, the sexiest SP I’ve seen because she has a natural, youthful beauty. Many SP’s appear older than they claim, have fake breasts, lip filler, etc. more porn star less girl next door. She is unique in this way. Pictures are real and recent (last time I saw her). I agree with what one poster said above RE the first meeting feeling transactional. She was definitely down to business quickly and *seemed* to want it to be over sooner rather than later. Not in an obvious “i hate this” way, and she wasn’t rude. But she wasn’t as great of an actor (or didn’t appear to genuinely enjoy it as much) as other SP’s. And, before the second meeting, I knocked on her door twice (because after waiting a bit I wasn’t sure she heard the first knock). I heard an audible sigh come from the room. The kind of sigh saying “I’m annoyed with this, let’s get it over with,” though she didn’t act obviously so after she opened the door (i.e. she was more “on” at this point). I don’t want to give people the wrong impression. She is my favorite SP because of how attractive I find her and I genuinely enjoy our meetings. But I get the sense she doesn’t enjoy the work as much as other SP’s and that can give me pause sometimes (I don’t want to be participating in someone’s displeasure). Later sessions have been better, with her seeming to express more genuine pleasure. Final point. She isn’t GFE. All protected, no kissing on lips, no DATY, etc. But you can feel safe in knowing she cares about her health. Final verdict, I would recommend her highly. I hope she does enjoy the work. If not, as much as it’d be a loss for me and others, I hope she finds an alternative line of work that makes her happy.

Also curious. But there are red flags. I’m inclined to think she’s a scammer.

Good advice. Thank you for sharing.

For me, it’s all about counting calories. I’m not a fan of any diet that requires restricting certain food groups. Everything in moderation. Set gradual goals for becoming more active. That said, sometimes a person needs to participate in a formal diet program to stay motivated. To each their own.