Search the Community

https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/nova-scotia/halifax_other_without_time_or_limits_write_me-7237263 Hi, does anyone have any information on this SP? the picutures are apperantly verified by LL, but some red flags do concerns me, such as the face reveal (kinda...), no Lyla review, and most importantly the insanely low price. I'm afraid to text her, because I don't want to get spam texted by self proclaimed Halifax Escort Cartel from India.

Hello boys and girls, gals and pals! I’m quite new to this lifestyle and I am looking for some pointers. How does one get reviewed and verified? Also, I do not (yet) advertise on m*rb but I was told it is a ruthless platform and as a lady that is not too experienced on these platforms, I’d rather wait before throwing myself out there (or should I try my beginner’s luck and take a leap of faith?) Thoughts? Thanks!

Thank you, Samantha, for bringing up this topic. It's a topic which deserves review and thoughtful discussion. You mentioned a screening benefit to SPs for those clients who request an appointment and have a verified membership. What would the benefit be, exactly? Would it potentially deter verified members from providing SPs with information they require for their own independent screening? For example, if verified members provide CERB with their real name and other verifiable personal information, perhaps they will be reluctant to provide it to an SP who may/may not be less reliable? There are other websites that work like this. Perhaps some escorts who also use those websites can provide insight on this question (i.e p411). I worry because some SPs might feel pressured to see a client simply because he's paid for a verified membership and then they will have little recourse if something bad happens. Given the above situation, you suggest the information might be disclosed if the client is proven to be dangerous. I wonder what it means, exactly, to be proven as dangerous. Would the CERB council decide this? I ask because sexual assault is such a contentious issue (i.e. what is and isn't assault, who is to 'blame', what he said versus what she said, etc.). It would be awful, absolutely awful, to be doubted in these types of circumstances. It would be equally awful to have to 'prove' to CERB that I was assaulted, or felt violated, or robbed, in order to get the necessary information I need to protect myself. A few thoughts to get the conversation going.