Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Swedish deportation of EU Sex Workers slowed by Court Ruling

Recommended Posts

Guest W***ledi*Time
[I]The Local [/I]reports, 11 Oct 2011:

[url]http://www.thelocal.se/36664/20111011/[/url]

A Swedish court has ruled that prostitutes from other European Union countries should not be deported for at least their first three months in Sweden, much to the dismay of the police.

â??The effect is that we broaden the market for EU prostitutes,â? Ingemo Melin-Olsson of the border police in Stockholm told Sveriges Radio (SR).

While selling sex isnâ??t illegal in Sweden, the purchase of sex is. In addition, prostitutes are often tied to pimping operations.

As a result, the police have been actively deporting prostitutes from Sweden, regardless of their citizenship, arguing that they represent a threat to the basic interests of society.

Police used similar grounds when they deported street beggars with EU citizenship last summer, but those deportations drew criticism from the Parliamentary Ombudsman (Justitieombudsmannen - JO).

While police and the Migration Court in Gothenburg are in agreement that prostitution isnâ??t a legitimate way to support oneself, the court has found that the EU directive on the free movement of EU citizens carries more weight.

According to the directive, EU citizens have the right to visit other EU countries for up to three months without any restrictions other than producing identification to confirm their EU citizenship.

â??For our work, this means that we donâ??t deport EU citizen prostitutes. On the other hand, we will deport prostitutes from third countries, that is to say, outside the EU-area,â? said Melin-Olsson.

She explained that, as of now, there is no legal precedent for how the cases of EU-citizen prostitutes should be handled.

However, police are hopeful that a case involving the deportation of a prostitute who is an EU-citizen currently under review by the ombudsman may eventually provide them with some more solid guidance.

â??No one really agrees on this, and that makes it easy to get confused,â? police inspector Marianne Paulsson told SR.

According to Paulsson, a ruling by the ombudsman is the closest thing to a legal precedent they can get, short of a change in the law.

â??But I think they ought to consider that too. I donâ??t think this provides legal certainty,â? she said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...