Guest W***ledi*Time Report post Posted March 1, 2011 Not sure if we need quite this much of the other site's drama pasted verbatim into Cerb. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Megan'sTouch 23875 Report post Posted March 1, 2011 Miabella - If a client I had "blacklisted" tried to sneak back in, and I found out, I also would have no-showed. No reason to explain why in such a case, as they should be able to figure it out. I defend Miabella posting her side of the story. Even though the OP didn't name her, he gave enough information that most of us could guess it was her (reviewed well on both board, great website, screening requirements.) There are two sides to every story and now we have both. Case closed! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kimberly-Shea 28280 Report post Posted March 1, 2011 Not sure if we need quite this much of the other site's drama pasted verbatim into Cerb. This has nothing to do with the "other" site. Her response was direct and given only after days of speculation (both in public and private) to the identity and professionalism of the sp. So to avoid being slandered in pm's she posted her response. I think she has the right to defend herself publicly. Kim 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest W***ledi*Time Report post Posted March 1, 2011 Of course she has the right to post her side of the story if she so chooses. What I stated was that I would prefer that things she objected to on the other site not be mixed up with what has been posted on this site. No one on this site has posted that she has gone out of her way to try and ruin a man's life just because he wrote something negative about her. No one on this site has posted that she is crazy girl or that all escorts are like that. No one on this site has questioned the authenticity of her reviews. If true, I find it pathetic that some members of this board spend their time speculating in private about the identity of providers that have not been named in public. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meg O'Ryan 266444 Report post Posted March 1, 2011 No one on this site would post anything negative as i am sure they are all aware of the ramifications. I am pretty sure that the majority of the people on this site are also members of other sites and able to read the trash found there. I see no harm in the way she has defended herself. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nicolette Vaughn 294340 Report post Posted March 1, 2011 Mia has carried out her response in a way that was not threatening towards other members nor did she she directly 'trash talk' the person who originally started this thread. She gave an explanation here in an attempt to state her side of the story which no longer meant that this was a hypothetical situation. She was simply defending herself and has every right to. So far this thread has been carried out in a civil manner and hopefully it stays that way. Does anyone think that it's perfectly acceptable for a person is going to lie about certain facts, have multiple identities here and then not expect the SP to come forward and defend herself and her reputation? I would certainly hope not! I realize this board is known for being a positive community but let's face it, situations like this will always come about and someone should not be able to start a thread about another person even though names weren't mentioned here yet they were on another board ( easy to put two and two together here) and have that person being seen in a negative light without being able to defend herself. If it is not okay to air dirty laundry on here, this thread should have been stopped from the beginning. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
docottawa 541 Report post Posted March 1, 2011 (edited) Well, I guess that if her her name was mentioned on other boards, in relation to this issue, that would be an effective way of circumnavigating CERB's "No Negative Reviews Policy". I, for one, had no idea who the OP was referring to. That's not to say that others didn't figure it out but, like WrinkledinTime writes, "If true, I find it pathetic that some members of this board spend their time speculating in private about the identity of providers that have not been named in public." Just curious, though. Does this fellow have a reputation for boorish behaviour? Edited March 1, 2011 by docottawa Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miss Scarlett 25073 Report post Posted March 1, 2011 We are not allowed to answer your question Doc as it would be a breach for the SP only area. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cat 262460 Report post Posted March 1, 2011 Suffice it to say that SPs didn't really voice in until Mia's entry. This was her decision and the SPs respected her decision to sit quiet and see if it died down. Her explanation is clear and accepted by the SPs for reasons that are our own. There seems to be no reason to continue with the discussion. If someone tried to sneak back in to see me after I had told him that he was not welcome, he would have received the same treatment from me as did Mia. Enough said. cat 14 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
moonshine 399 Report post Posted March 1, 2011 I never really understand the point of these threads to begin with. They usually go, "this happened to me, now here's my biased side of the story, please validate I am correct". And in this case you've got someone putting it out there like they're taking the high road by not naming anybody, but then giving enough details for others to speculate. Just get rid of this shit, it's neither productive, informative or interesting. I read the other board, you can just tell sometimes that there's relevant information missing. When a guy says he tried contacting a girl and she won't respond to him, 9 times out of 10 it's because he was a dick somehow. Of course that part always seems to get left out. 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The General 11309 Report post Posted March 2, 2011 Very classy reply, by a very classy lady. She didn't have to, but good of her to feel that it was in her best interest to share her side. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mod 135640 Report post Posted March 2, 2011 I think we can put this to an end? - CLOSED. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
