Leomorry 59 Report post Posted April 14, 2019 Anyone seen any of these ladies? Amber https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/new-brunswick/saint_john_amber_bombshell_barbie-4851296 Ashley https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/new-brunswick/saint_john_saint_john_ashley-4849933 FYI : I've visited Mika and she obviously don't know how to take pictures. She pretty and fantastic provider https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/new-brunswick/saint_john_mika_in_saint_john-3586994 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leomorry 59 Report post Posted April 14, 2019 For people wondering. Ashley and Amber are same person. Fake and old photos, she is like 30+ and I won't repeat. Like Ever. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted April 14, 2019 7 hours ago, Leomorry said: FYI : I've visited Mika and she obviously don't know how to take pictures. She pretty and fantastic provider https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/new-brunswick/saint_john_mika_in_saint_john-3586994 There's a bit of irony in creating a thread to expose a provider working under two names and using fake pics, while at the same time recommending another who also uses stolen pictures in circulation for over 4 years. Here's the source: https://myblackgfs.com/?m=201608 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrSmashems 1012 Report post Posted April 15, 2019 15 hours ago, Leomorry said: For people wondering. Ashley and Amber are same person. Fake and old photos, she is like 30+ and I won't repeat. Like Ever. Are they old photos or completely fake for ashley? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hunger 212 Report post Posted April 15, 2019 so can anyone second that opinion on Mika? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted April 15, 2019 25 minutes ago, hunger said: so can anyone second that opinion on Mika? I already posted evidence in regard to the source of the pictures in her ad. From there, everything said about her should be taken with a grain of salt. If the objective of the OP was to recommend her, he should have done it in the appropriate forum without a gratuitous jab at someone else. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leomorry 59 Report post Posted April 16, 2019 Completely fake 12 hours ago, MrSmashems said: Are they old photos or completely fake for ashley? @Greenteal I guess I couldn't tell the difference I did mention "she obviously don't know how to take pictures", because she looked different, better different in person. On 4/14/2019 at 11:27 AM, Leomorry said: and she obviously don't know how to take pictures. She pretty and fantastic provider 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted April 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Leomorry said: Completely fake @Greenteal I guess I couldn't tell the difference I did mention "she obviously don't know how to take pictures", because she looked different, better different in person. Looking "different/better" or not doesn't change the fact the pictures used are fake. And like I already mentioned, there's a forum for recommendations and it's far better than a short shout-out on an unrelated thread. As for "Amber and Ashley", if the pictures, stats and descriptions don't remotely represent reality, you can expose those ads as "bait & switch" in the Warnings forum. Keep in mind this a recommendation board and not made for negative reviews. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andee 220524 Report post Posted October 16, 2019 Should not be promoting Providers who are using fake pics no matter if you liked them or not. 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
