On "Model Looks"

[Guest C*****tte]

I was once answering emails and the phone for another SP while she was out of town. Her clientele made it quite clear that only models (actual models) were what they were interested in. They would chat with me and they would find me interesting and ask to book me, but there is no way I would take the dates. In fact, when I told them about myself (height, weight and age) it was amazing to hear them backtrack on their offers.

 

Some clients are extremely particular about the appearance of the ladies they see. They want ladies who are 5'8 120lbs (for real) with C cups with impeccable skin and firm bodies. Yes, these ladies do exist and they are bright, educated and provide a good service. They also charge quite high rates.

 

There is someone for everyone. I very much enjoying meeting clients who are the right match for me. That is the key. Everyone is happy with the arrangement.

[whiteman 14028]

I was once answering emails and the phone for another SP while she was out of town. Her clientele made it quite clear that only models (actual models) were what they were interested in. They would chat with me and they would find me interesting and ask to book me, but there is no way I would take the dates. In fact, when I told them about myself (height, weight and age) it was amazing to hear them backtrack on their offers.

Ouch, that does sound like a bunch of guys that are way too picky. But I can also come up with some simple explanations for why they may be like that. I've run into situations where the description on the phone didn't match the description that showed up in front of me. Usually the weight is where the major discrepancies occur. It's obvious that there is a fudge factor employed by most SP's when describing their weights. I think even slim girls reduce their weights by 10% on the description. But some other girls (usually larger girls) might use a 20% fudge factor. So it might be that a large girl describes herself with the same weight as a slim girl, due to usage of different fudge factors. So maybe these guys have gotten caught in this trap before and now they are very pedantic about the exact descriptions, where various other body measurements are used to verify the accuracy of the weight. Just my theory, anyways.

[master 245]

Many things are factors of good rendez-vous. Looks might be 3rd on the list. :)

[Sensual Erin 33928]

Ouch, that does sound like a bunch of guys that are way too picky. But I can also come up with some simple explanations for why they may be like that. I've run into situations where the description on the phone didn't match the description that showed up in front of me. Usually the weight is where the major discrepancies occur. It's obvious that there is a fudge factor employed by most SP's when describing their weights. I think even slim girls reduce their weights by 10% on the description. But some other girls (usually larger girls) might use a 20% fudge factor. So it might be that a large girl describes herself with the same weight as a slim girl, due to usage of different fudge factors. So maybe these guys have gotten caught in this trap before and now they are very pedantic about the exact descriptions, where various other body measurements are used to verify the accuracy of the weight. Just my theory, anyways.

 

I think it's a trickle effect from clients with these expectations. Model looks do come in all shapes and sizes but lots of men will judge a larger girl as not the "model type." Tyra Banks even has plus size models that can compete with the skinnier girls and do have "model looks" and in many cases prettier than the skinny ones as they glow with health. They're real women that love life and enjoy everything in balance. That to me is sexy! I don't think weight should have to be revealed or lied about to start with. An honest lady that has pictures of her body to be seen, is symmetrical, has the perfect hourglass, and takes good care of herself. Whether it be 34 24 34 or 42 32 42. Body weight should never be a question for any of us to have to answer really.

 

Additional Comments:

I guess I'm in the minority, but I tend to prefer looks over attitude.

 

I figure, in my dating life, I can get a woman 30+, one who's modestly attractive, and since she's actually dating me, shows enthusiasm being in my company.

 

What I CAN'T get in my real life is a woman in her early 20s and conventionally/objectively beautiful. So that is what I'm partially paying for.

 

In fact, the more young and beautiful she is, the less she has to do! She can just lie there like a lump for all I care.

 

Fortunately, it seems these days we can get both beauty and good company in one encounter.

 

So a beautiful lump of non sexual 'Model looks" stereotype that just lies there is the ideal? I'm a woman that has an appreciation for the female body and know many ladies over 30 as well that are drop dead gorgeous, sparkle with personality, confident, know themselves with maturity and what they value, know and expect from men they meet on a personal level. You may not be able to date them either. Sorry but it's very true! :) Age is a number, weight is a number, a beautiful woman on the inside and out, is absolutely priceless!!!!