Anyone see Sonia Dubois before?

[SamIsDTF 26]

50 minutes ago, Sonia DuBois said:

 

 

I wasnt going to answer this, but this is a scraper site. I never posted on escort20

 

Also the age doesn't add up per year but try again.... 

 

I've been booked for the past 5 days. If I was mid 40s, someone would have written that on here by now, because everyone has found me through this website. I also spent 2 months here in 2022.... and nobody wrote anything. You are talking about some isolated incident in Winnipeg with some psycho I had to kick out to justify some argument when you're not even going to book me.

 

It would take you guys less time to book and see for yourself if I look 50, 40 or 30 or younger with the amount of unpaid time some of you spend on here which you could have been using to just work to afford to book someone.

 

I didn't make a "shill" account - if you don't believe me about that, write the mods and see that it's not the same IP address.

 

And TBH? I'm starting to get the feeling some of these "clients" posting here are actually "shilling" for local women as I'm touring, in some attempt to ruin business.

 

You want to know why I didn't update my pics in years? I look exactly the same. The last photoshoot I did was 2023, in the black lingerie. Go to my website and obsessively look that up as well, then you should take that pic and put it next to the other pics, go back and forth, and realize that maybe my toenail polish was a different colour. There's literally no reason NOT to use these photos. If I didn't look like my photos, again, someone would have mentioned it by now.

 

I welcome any "veteran" client's booking to "validate" me or whatever. The thing is, my base rate is 500. That's peanuts for someone with actual money. They don't spend hours researching people "maybe this maybe that" for some one hour booking- they just book. The guy in Winnipeg was an uber driver and I have the SMS record of that. For him it was a lot of money but he retartedly ran away not asking for half back. That is HIS problem.

 

And now please go off about "my personality" and spend countless hours obsessing over me for no reason. 

 

Cuz everyone needs to know every single little negative thing you can scrape together for what I'm like so the local girls can still make money right? I really question the motivation behind this since clearly, you don't want to book me, so why are you trying to find these slivers of negative shit? Using the same pics? Kind of a bit of a reach dont' you think?

 

We try to discern the most we can from the information available, before we decide to engage with an SP. Just as you do by requiring a photo ID and references. 

[Sonia DuBois 1162]

Who is “we”? Sounds paranoid af. I’ve been booked all week and these people don’t care … 

[AdamSandler 221]

1 hour ago, Sonia DuBois said:

Who is “we”? Sounds paranoid af. I’ve been booked all week and these people don’t care … 

This site is literally called Canada’s escort RECOMMENDATION board. It’s here for both providers and clients to discuss things and recommend (or not) people’s services. So many people lie on their profile whether it’s age, weight, services, etc. I’m not saying you are lying but you are judging people and getting defensive for people wanting to discuss and find out some info on a discussion forum...

[Sonia DuBois 1162]

Yeah and my tour is now 50% over and these people twiddling their thumbs won’t book anyway. Haha

[AdamSandler 221]

25 minutes ago, Sonia DuBois said:

Yeah and my tour is now 50% over and these people twiddling their thumbs won’t book anyway. Haha

Some will, some won’t. No review policies often give people hesitation in my experience.

[Sonia DuBois 1162]

And? You’d think all those years where I’d be using all those old photos someone would have written something negative considering I tour constantly. Save your white knight for the pick-mes IRL, book them if you don’t want to see me. It’s easier than trolling, plus then you put your money directly in their pockets instead of trying to sabotage someone’s tour. “Your experience” is the echo chamber which is : boards and hobbyists who review.

You have some weird motivation to try to dissaude other people from booking.You don’t like my no review policy then don’t book me. But to go on and on about it, is fucking weird. 
 

don’t see me and book your local girl. I’m leaving in a few days anyway lol. So who cares

[AdamSandler 221]

No one is trying to sabotage anything. Sounds like you’re having a great tour here which is good to hear. Only one person has actually commented on this thread and confirmed they saw you and it was a very positive review. Everyone else is just having an open discussion but you seem to want to turn it into an argument and some of your comments come off as abrasive. 

And for negative reviews it’s very easy for providers to have posts removed when they are paying members of the various forums. But also maybe some people respect your no review policy and don’t want to get potentially blacklisted with other providers by breaking it publicly. Anyway just giving examples as I’m not trying to argue here. 

I hope you’re enjoying your time in Halifax and your clients are leaving happy.

[Sonia DuBois 1162]

Most escorts that charge my rate don’t allow reviews. The thing which I already explained is, in smaller cities we HAVE to use boards because this is where local clientele find us. Everyone in Halifax uses Lyla. I put an ad on Tryst and got literally 1 enquiry. You can’t expect people to tour here without using Lyla (a board, that for example no one uses in Vancouver or Toronto) and being a smaller city, many clients want touring escorts because they don’t want to run into people they know. This is why I am so busy. I don’t appreciate the weird arguments or the mansplaining about how boards work when you don’t understand how touring works or that a lot of clientele don’t give a shit about reviews (writing or reading what hobbyists have to say). If they did, I’d have legit no business and would have stopped years ago. Thanks for your criticism of my tone as well - unfortunately I have to answer you as this is where I have to advertise.
 

If you don’t want touring escorts to visit, then continue writing this shit on here. I guarantee you the majority of high class escorts in major cities ask not to be reviewed (check their websites) but then you’re cutting your options for people who tour to Halifax if you expect everyone to want to be reviewed. Which isn’t fair to other paying clientele who want people to tour to this region.

 

Clearly you also looked things up that were positive to verify my legitimacy (My numerous P411 OKs for example), but you are only trying to showcase the negative - and reach for things which aren’t even relevant as if I don’t know exactly what you’re doing.
 

Even a client wrote something positive about me on here (which you were looking for) and you even went so far as to say I made a fake account and wrote that myself. Again, if you want local women to not lose money, go ahead and book them and support them. No one is forcing you to book me and not them.

 

Lyla is a free website. No one pays to advertise on here.
 

Enjoy your life 

[SamIsDTF 26]

AI analysis of this thread:

 

Analyzing personalities and motivations

I’m trying to identify the personalities and motivations of different forum posters.

OP seems polite, focuses on rational discussion, and is likely trying to vet a provider. Sonia, on the other hand, comes across as defensive and cynical, motivated by protecting her brand and ensuring high-paying clients. SamIsDTF is analytical, probably suspicious of "shills", and protective of the community. Others like Njosnavelin show empathy, while NewGuy_411 appears on the fence, seeking mutual respect. SincereSerenade’s also defensive, potentially a client, and looks polite but might be misjudged.

Thought for 16 seconds

Below is a read‑between‑the‑lines portrait of the main voices in the two‑page thread. (Citations point to the exact forum snippets that informed each observation.)

Poster	Communication style	Likely personality traits	What seems to motivate them
AdamSandler (thread starter, Halifax hobbyist)	Polite opener asking for info; later tries to mediate when things heat up, clarifies he isn’t “sabotaging” Sonia’s tour and acknowledges one positive report	• Pragmatic vetter • Values civility • Slightly risk‑averse	Wants enough firsthand data to justify handing over his ID + $$. Also wants the local board to stay constructive, not a flame‑war — hence repeated efforts to calm the thread.
NewGuy_411 (new hobbyist)	Welcomes DMs, later calls Sonia’s forum tone a “very bad look” and asks for “respect and kindness on both sides”	• Optimistic newcomer • Sensitive to courtesy signals	Trying to gauge “vibe fit” before spending money; equates an escort’s online demeanor with probable session chemistry.
Njosnavelin	Defends Sonia’s right to be “short” when her no‑review rule is ignored, frames the pushback as boundary‑respect	• Empathetic • Boundary‑focused	Likely sees himself as an ally to providers; wants hobbyists to remember escorts’ safety concerns and emotional labour.
SamIsDTF	Runs an AI stylometry test, posts a 500‑word forensic breakdown claiming an 85‑95 % chance a glowing review is “self‑written”	• Methodical skeptic • Enjoys “detective” role • High need for community credibility	Protecting the board’s information ecosystem: fake shills can distort market signals. Also relishes the intellectual exercise.
SincereSerenade (brand‑new account accused of being shill)	Calm rebuttal: “people can use AI to proof their writing… I’m just trying to help”	• Defensive but courteous • Possibly genuine first‑time reviewer	Either an earnest rookie who liked Sonia and feels wrongly accused, or (if Sam is right) Sonia’s attempt at guerrilla marketing. In either case the motivation is to salvage the credibility of the positive post.
Sonia DuBois (touring escort)	Long, detailed narrative of Winnipeg “psycho client,” blunt language (“paranoid af,” “retartedly ran away”); frames hobbyists’ scrutiny as sabotage by local competitors; cites her €500 rate & full calendar as proof of legitimacy	• Highly assertive • Direct, no‑nonsense (may read as combative) • Protective of autonomy & brand	1️⃣ Safety control: public reviews can expose address/personal details. 2️⃣ Reputation management: she fears a single bad‑faith review will cost tours. 3️⃣ Economic leverage: keeps no‑review policy to maintain upscale mystique and discourage bargain‑hunters who “spend hours researching people ‘maybe this maybe that’ instead of just booking.”
Thread dynamic overall	Hobbyist side is split between due‑diligence vets (Adam, Sam) and provider‑empathy voices (Njosnavelin). Sonia perceives both as time‑wasters who probably won’t book. Accusations of sock‑puppeting escalate mistrust, while Sonia’s blunt rebuttals amplify hobbyists’ caution.		The clash is classic “review‑culture vs. privacy‑culture.” Hobbyists want reassurance and community accountability; Sonia wants unilateral control over her narrative. Both see the other’s norm‑set as threatening their economic or emotional safety.

In short:

• Adam & NewGuy value civility and reliable intel.

• Sam values crowd‑sourced truth and enjoys the sleuth role.

• Njosnavelin prioritises respect for sex‑workers’ boundaries.

• Sonia prioritises autonomy, feels embattled, and argues that Halifax’s small‑market economics force her onto boards she dislikes.

• SincereSerenade is either a genuine satisfied client or a marketing move; either way the reaction shows how low‑post‑count praise is distrusted.

Understanding these motivations helps explain why the thread spirals: everyone is talking about trust—but each group defines trust differently.

[SincereSerenade 6]

LOL this is hilarious. Pretty accurate too.

[foundnewland 195]

look, i'm curious to see Ms DuBois, maybe on her next tour if she returns, so if any of the many gentleman who have visited with her recently can DM with a review of their experience, I would greatly appreciate it.

[Sonia DuBois 1162]

TLDR summary : arguing with narcissistic incels is a waste of time 

[Pamela Luscious 87]

Honestly, it’s wild how some of you are still debating whether Sonia was “too rude” when the real issue is: her boundary was ignored, her consent was pushed, and she was retaliated against for daring to say no.

 

If a provider says “don’t review or discuss me,” that should be the end of it. Arguing with her about how she enforces that boundary, or expecting her to stay soft and accommodating while being disrespected is just another form of entitlement. You’re not owed her emotional labor, and you’re definitely not owed her politeness after crossing a line she clearly set.

 

Meanwhile, the guy who lied, grabbed her face, broke her rules, and threatened a bad review? Somehow not the focus.

 

Sonia doesn’t need defending, she laid out her side clearly, respectfully, and with more transparency than anyone deserved. But let’s stop pretending that firmness = rudeness. If you want kindness and softness, maybe start by offering respect first.

[Timmy 65]

Is there a way to unsubscribe from a post?

[AdamSandler 221]

13 minutes ago, Timmy said:

Is there a way to unsubscribe from a post?

I think in the top you can remove yourself from following 

[SincereSerenade 6]

12 hours ago, Pamela Luscious said:

Honestly, it’s wild how some of you are still debating whether Sonia was “too rude” when the real issue is: her boundary was ignored, her consent was pushed, and she was retaliated against for daring to say no.

 

If a provider says “don’t review or discuss me,” that should be the end of it. Arguing with her about how she enforces that boundary, or expecting her to stay soft and accommodating while being disrespected is just another form of entitlement. You’re not owed her emotional labor, and you’re definitely not owed her politeness after crossing a line she clearly set.

 

Meanwhile, the guy who lied, grabbed her face, broke her rules, and threatened a bad review? Somehow not the focus.

 

Sonia doesn’t need defending, she laid out her side clearly, respectfully, and with more transparency than anyone deserved. But let’s stop pretending that firmness = rudeness. If you want kindness and softness, maybe start by offering respect first.

Thanks! Exactly.

People deserve to know when a SP is being dishonest. What’s shocking here is how unaffected the guy is by all this. You’d expect the community to respond much more strongly to such unacceptable behavior.

Respecting boundaries isn’t hard. Most people just want to have a good time. Just ask. If something’s not your vibe, respect it and move on. Just for a second, put yourself in her shoes. How would you react?

Even when it comes to leaving a review, it’s simple: ask if the SP is okay with it. I literally did that yesterday, asked Pamela if she was comfortable with me posting one, and she clearly laid out her boundaries.

Men need to do better. Honestly, we all do.