30 minute incalls

[Nicolette Vaughn 294340]

I may be in the minority here but in the past I only did a minimum of one hour appts but decided to try half hour appts. I understand why people like half hours. They have a limited amount of time during the day when they can skip out on their lunch break and it also indicates to me in that time if I would like to see the person again or not if they decided to call me back.

 

I'm still selective in who I see and even though I have a long list of "Nooner" or "afternoon drive home" clients in my area, I have hand picked who I will see after that initial 30 min appt. I have very nice clients so it is rare that I will refuse to see someone again unless they have done something inappropriate, rude or made me feel uncomfortable.

 

Having said that, I still make myself available for one hour appts or more but most of my business is through half hour appts and it's what I'm used to for first time meetings.. However, I wouldn't limit my business to just 30 minutes but I would prefer to meet someone on a half hour for the first time on an incall and then they could decide if they want to spend more time with me. This way they are not obligated to spend more time or money and they walk away feeling satisfied within that half hour giving them the decision to decide what to do for another encounter whether it's with me or another SP.

 

Half hour and hour appts can differ in terms of type of client, location, rates, etc but I am still flexible on all types of appts as most of my time spent as an escort has been offering 1 hour + plus sessions. I adapt very easily whether it's 30 minutes, 1 hour or 2 hours and can also read people in terms of what they are looking for during an encounter.

[brockvilleman 615]

if i were to try someone new i think i would go for the 30 minutes . as you say to see if we click or not. i have only been doing the hour and , thankfully only a couple times i have not clicked and those times were not good.i couldnt wait to get out. now the others i could have talked with all day. wish i could afford to see them all more often.

[BootyLoving 2441]

I much prefer the 45, it's balanced. The halfie is great for the working hour getaway, and 45 is excellent intro. Once I extended into a 2.5 hour session, but most of that was talking, and relaxing. She was hot, the session was great, but the connection was too much to stop. However, the connection got too deep, and we both felt weird completing the formality session afterward knowing it was for money. So double edge sword. Next time, hugs, kisses, get it on, then go out for a date, walk, stroll, and chit chat some more like you are going on a date.

[Zoe Makeda 140]

I may be in the minority here but I prefer a 30 minute appointmen for that first meeting that way if we don't click there is no awkwardness, if we do click then we can extend the sessiion or book longer next time. Thankfully I can count on half a hand encounters where we didn't click.

Also some providers are great at the physical aspect of an encounter, but aren't comfortable with the social conversational aspects of a session, providng a 30 minute session may well be within her comfort zone.while it takes the same amount of time and care to prepare for a longer apointment as it does a half hour. There is likely a market for it as some gents may not be seeking the social aspects of an encounter and would prefer the option. Its important however for gents to respect the providers who choose not to offer 30 minute sessions.

 

We are lucky to live in a socitey where we have a variety of choices and options t choose from that meet out emotional, financial and physical needs!

Interesting explanation Cowboy Kenny. I did meet a few ladies whom were very comfortable with short appointments, not only for the quick perks, but basically they didn't enjoy the talk. I was also quite shocked to discover the popularity of these "short&sweet" encounters.

 

I'm into longer appointments, balancing between the tease and the talk, reaching the goal of building up not only my Invitee's desire, but mine as well. That's one of the reason why longer dates work best in my case. I consider 1h dates to be somewhat too fast, but some Invitee may ponder many factors when making the decision about the lenght of a date, especially a first one.

 

In the end, as long as needs are fulfilled. Xx

[johnybird 4391]

I'm into longer appointments, balancing between the tease and the talk, reaching the goal of building up not only my Invitee's desire, but mine as well.

 

I'm the same way, I find the buildup the best part. Starting off soft and easy and just starts getting intense as you go (I'm getting myself worked up once again)

 

Although a quickie is nice at times. I still enjoy cuddling afterwards and talking, Rather then just getting dressed and leaving.

[Honey Man 12759]

I like to book for an hour and be done in the half and then do the talking part. to much talking upfront and I find the event does not always go as well as expected. I guess I am turned on more by being with a stranger then being with a friend. And after the main event the talking part is very enjoyable and have made some nice friends as a result of that. And in a few cases have been glad to get out of there after the half hour :)

[darkvader6t9 530]

I'm just like the cowboy any first session with a new lady I always go for the half an hour appointment and it's helped me allot to get out of situations where we just didn't click. Even if I'm seeing a reputable lady for the first time I'll do the same since it's happened with a very few that there was no chemistry.

[FranZKafkA 231]

I'm new to this but it seems an hour is barely long enough, but I can see if things are uncomfortable then it's better for both parties.

 

I'm still in the awkward stage even setting up a rendezvous and then jittery during session so it seems to need an hour.

 

Has experience made a difference in session length?

 

What do the ladies typically prefer in the initial session?

[Andee 220524]

If asked my opinion, I usually suggest 45 minutes as 30 minutes may not be enough time and one hour may be too long.

 

When it comes right down to it, it all about what kind of session the client is looking for and what he can afford.

[MoodyBlue 392]

I was rather surprised at the number of SPs and clients who prefer or take 30 min. sessions. I had no idea that many would prefer a "quickie". Personally, I would probably compromise. Someone mentioned 45 minutes, I don't see too many ads for 45 min sessions but that and this topic have me completely rethinking how I meet someone new.

 

Because I'm not a young pup anymore, 30 minutes just might not be enough for me. LOL The idea of 45 minutes sounds like a great way to (I hate to use this term) "test drive" the chemistry or possible hostility? Had I been doing this as a rule, it would already saved me grief and money as I've discovered recently.

 

I rate this thread 5 stars because for me, it will literally change how I do things. I can't afford to meet with ladies on frequent basis BUT I guess that as a relatively inexperienced "noob" I have learned an INVALUABLE (screening) TIP here. The biggest thing is that this will literally change my philosophy and way of doing business when meeting new SPs.

 

You see, all this time, I always thought that 90 minute sessions would be preferable with the thinking that not having to watch the clock and the extra time would allow extra time to chat before and after. Oddly, it never really occurred to me that "What if?" once I got there, it could be like icewater. So, no more 90 minute 1st time meets. I think 45mins (possibly an hour would be ideal in my case).

 

Without mentioning any names I met someone new and booked 90 minutes 3 times. Everything "clicked" and I was happy on the first meet. I was SOLD/HOOKED on this lady. HOWEVER, AS I LEARNED, YOU STILL HAVE TO BE CAREFUL BECAUSE YOUR NEXT MEETING OR TWO COULD FOR SOME REASON TURN OUT TO BE DISASTERS. Let's just say that it was a COSTLY LESSON fore me and I'm now on the side of shorter initial meetings, even 2 or 3 before I would commit to 90 minutes everytime. So, this thread has been a real "eye opener" for me.

 

Thank You for starting this thread and the very good comments.

[Peter Smith 808]

Wow this really has me rethinking things. I always opt for min. 1 hr because I hate to be rushed but now who knows. I think i may try a 30 minute event today just to see how it works out or works in or whatever. This is really food for thought especially knowing how SP's think.

 

Additional Comments:

Wow this really has me rethinking things. I always opt for min. 1 hr because I hate to be rushed but now who knows. I think i may try a 30 minute event today just to see how it works out or works in or whatever. This is really food for thought especially knowing how SP's think.