JoyfulC 132299 Report post Posted June 12, 2009 I dunno this is a rather tricky subject in my opinion. I would say that similarly as it is the clients responsibility to show up on time, pay the appropriate amount, treat your lady with respect and avoid no shows at all costs it is the SP's reponsibility to answer direct questions about their service. Now we all know there are peoples on both sides of the fence that fail in this regard but all we can do is try our best to interact harmoniously as both participants are interdependent on each other for this all to work.... A symbiotic relationship, you know, like those little fish that clean off sharks and in return dont get eaten lol. In the end though we are all humans, maybe the SP was just having a bad day. Either way i'm sure it was nothing personal As long as you're only looking for outcall from an SP who provides only outcall service, I suppose that's reasonable. But if you're looking for an incall service provider, all the rules regarding "communication for the purposes of" go right out the window. They only apply to what happens in public. An SP doesn't need to communicate in public to bring a bawdy house charge down on herself. Certain communications in private are evidence of bawdy house. I really wish that some guys would figure it out that it's unreasonable to expect the SPs to take such enormous risks so that they can enjoy none at all (while still enjoying great service), and I really wish some SPs would make the effort to sort out what's legal and what isn't so that they don't put others in the position of either having to lose business or compromise themselves legally to compete. But then, I suspect LE has an active role on boards such as this, and makes every effort to muddy the waters and lead the dim-witted astray. Truth is, you simply can't be too careful when staying on the right side of the law. This subject is much "trickier" than most here seem to realize. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drg23 124 Report post Posted June 12, 2009 As long as you're only looking for outcall from an SP who provides only outcall service, I suppose that's reasonable. But if you're looking for an incall service provider, all the rules regarding "communication for the purposes of" go right out the window. They only apply to what happens in public. An SP doesn't need to communicate in public to bring a bawdy house charge down on herself. Certain communications in private are evidence of bawdy house. I really wish that some guys would figure it out that it's unreasonable to expect the SPs to take such enormous risks so that they can enjoy none at all (while still enjoying great service), and I really wish some SPs would make the effort to sort out what's legal and what isn't so that they don't put others in the position of either having to lose business or compromise themselves legally to compete. But then, I suspect LE has an active role on boards such as this, and makes every effort to muddy the waters and lead the dim-witted astray. Truth is, you simply can't be too careful when staying on the right side of the law. This subject is much "trickier" than most here seem to realize. As long as you're only looking for outcall from an SP who provides only outcall service, I suppose that's reasonable. But if you're looking for an incall service provider, all the rules regarding "communication for the purposes of" go right out the window. They only apply to what happens in public. An SP doesn't need to communicate in public to bring a bawdy house charge down on herself. Certain communications in private are evidence of bawdy house. I really wish that some guys would figure it out that it's unreasonable to expect the SPs to take such enormous risks so that they can enjoy none at all (while still enjoying great service), and I really wish some SPs would make the effort to sort out what's legal and what isn't so that they don't put others in the position of either having to lose business or compromise themselves legally to compete. But then, I suspect LE has an active role on boards such as this, and makes every effort to muddy the waters and lead the dim-witted astray. Truth is, you simply can't be too careful when staying on the right side of the law. This subject is much "trickier" than most here seem to realize. I apologize, I may have misunderstood but it was my understanding the OP sent the message privately although I suppose even this is what you meant by "Certain communications in private are evidence of bawdy house". Either way you are totally correct as the girls own safety both physically and from the iron clad hand of the law are of utmost importance. As these precautions are also beneficial to the hobbiest. Unfortunately, it is a fine line I would think because don't both the SP and the man want him to get exactly what they are looking for out of the experience.(That is to say within the boundaries of the SP) And after meeting my share of lovely and sweet ladies I would say the answer from the SP side is invariably , yes :-). Regardless I do see where you are coming from and believe you are correct in that regard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grass_Hopper 18263 Report post Posted June 12, 2009 I believe it depends on wich side of the bridge you are... For myself, I rather keep it safe and specify that it's an ESCORT service... You are paying me for my time... Not the services... I don't have any extras, and if you are not happy, go... I have 1 restriction, and it's very obvious... Don't ask me questions, please. For real needs, my website will tell you what I'm capable of... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drg23 124 Report post Posted June 12, 2009 I believe it depends on wich side of the bridge you are... For myself, I rather keep it safe and specify that it's an ESCORT service... You are paying me for my time... Not the services... I don't have any extras, and if you are not happy, go... I have 1 restriction, and it's very obvious... Don't ask me questions, please. For real needs, my website will tell you what I'm capable of... Hehehe capable of whole lot! Btw I can't seem to grill a peppersteak without thinkin of ya :-) And yes I do believe the ladies should be able to ask this much, if the information is already listed on the site, you shouldn't be asking those questions to be sure. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoyfulC 132299 Report post Posted June 12, 2009 The truly odd thing is that most new customers never seem to need to ask about such things. It's only occasionally that I encounter someone who seems to almost have a checklist of things he needs to get me to commit to -- and that always makes me suspicious. Sure, one explanation might be that he just really needs to be sure of what he can expect (...although, based on many reviews I've read, it's still no guarantee). But there are other reasons why someone might try to pressure an SP to compromise herself. I'm with Grass Hopper: I charge for my time and company. Nothing else is offered, provided or guaranteed. That said, I have always enjoyed a healthy amount of repeat business. No one knows -- or should know -- what goes on behind closed doors. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
