Jump to content

kingstons yummy mummy?

Recommended Posts

Ok so I must ask! I have seen this add on backpage over the last few weeks " miss alana kingstons yummy mummy". Now I do know there is sp's who do continue during pregnancy. This would not be a personal choice of my own for several reasons, however I am not one to judge another situation and beliefs, to each their own. What really gets me is the "420 Friendly" comment stated in the advert! Pregnant and using any form of drugs or alcohol I believe is not ok on any level. So my question is, is this add even real? I just cant wrap my head around this or the marketing angle?

 

http://kingston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/miss-alana-kingstons-yummy-mummyback-by-popular-demand-let-me-be-your-fantasy-22/21963167

Edited by JessicaSugarbabe
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering if anyone else would find this as disturbing as I do? I agree with you about working while pregnant being a personal choice but there's no excuse for endangering the health of an unborn child. Wrong on so many levels.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other side, saying '420 friendly' doesn't necessarily mean, 'bring some so we can smoke up together'. It may just mean if you want to smoke it, go ahead. however, even that would be 2nd hand smoke, and shows a curious lack of common sense.

 

maybe it is just left over from an older pre preggers ad, at least we can hope for the best.

 

also you could report the ad, regarding the drug part of it, and perhaps bp will edit that out so no potential clients will read it and think it is OK to smoke around pregnant women.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

these a good chance she isn't even preggers. She might just have a beer belly and telling people shes preggers just covers it up.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
these a good chance she isn't even preggers. She might just have a beer belly and telling people shes preggers just covers it up.

 

Lol, Thanks for the laugh! We can only hope :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They call it dope for a reason.

 

To bad the kid will be stuck with a pinhead mom that isnt using her better judgement for the sake and well being of the kid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we please stop with the insults and assumptions? As fortunateone pointed out, stating "420 friendly" does not necessarily mean that the provider herself partakes.

 

Personally, I find it inappropriate that one provider is commenting on another provider's ad. Whether you agree with this woman's choice or not, publicly deriding another worker on a public forum is in bad taste and comes across as trying to cut out competition. Focus on yourself, and stop with the judgmental comments.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately posting that link on CERB may give it more visibility

But even if she herself doesn't smoke pot she and her fetus are exposed to second hand pot smoke which is a at least according to this link is a hazard to the fetus

 

http://www.pregnancyandbaby.com/pregnancy/articles/937071/secondhand-toke-marijuana-pregnancy

 

It may be worded judgementally but really there are some real health risks that an innocent third party (the fetus) could receive and end up being the one dealing with for the rest of his/her life

 

Some bigger things to consider here.

 

RG

Edited by r__m__g_uy
Additional Thoughts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My intention was never to insult anyone. My intention was to find out if it was even legit (as half on backpage are not) and report it. I was hoping it to be one of many backpage scams. There has been other post from same sp stating "party girl" ect. As I said if it was my neighbour doing the same thing I would report it.

 

I appreciate your opinion and understand 100% where you are coming from as others business and personal lives are none of my concern, but this felt different. If I look bad for standing up for a child who cant do it for themselves then I'm ok with that. I would do the same thing again tomorrow.

Edited by JessicaSugarbabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately posting that link on CERB may give it more visibility

But even if she herself doesn't smoke pot she and her fetus are exposed to second hand pot smoke which is a at least according to this link is a hazard to the fetus

 

http://www.pregnancyandbaby.com/pregnancy/articles/937071/secondhand-toke-marijuana-pregnancy

 

It isn't being judgemental really, there are health risks that an innocent third party could receive

 

RG

You're making the assumption that the client or the provider are smoking in the room. Stating 420-friendly does not necessarily imply that the provider is in contact with someone smoking pot; it may be that if someone shows up under the influence of marijuana, that is okay with her.

 

I don't know this lady. I am not going to make assumptions or pass judgment. Whether I agree with her personal choices or not, it's not my place to make those comments publicly.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're making the assumption that the client or the provider are smoking in the room. Stating 420-friendly does not necessarily imply that the provider is in contact with someone smoking pot; it may be that if someone shows up under the influence of marijuana, that is okay with her.

 

I don't know this lady. I am not going to make assumptions or pass judgment. Whether I agree with her personal choices or not, it's not my place to make those comments publicly.

 

I do not know this lady either. I am reading her ad, her words, and making what I think is a reasonable assumption, actually very reasonable assumptions based on a cold reading of her words, nothing else

And that is, being 420 Friendly runs the gamut from being friendly to those who smoke marijuana, to liking to smoke marijuana to possibly in this case, will accept a client who is already high on marijuana.

As for making comments publically that is your choice which I respect, just as it is my choice and others to comment publically.

It isn't being judgemental, but it is making very reasonable assumptions

My opinion and rambling

 

RG

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...