Jump to content

Peter McKay's sidekick debates C36

Recommended Posts

Petey's parliamentary secretary Bob Dechert debated Francoise Boivin (NDP) this morning.

Go to http://www.cbc.ca/thehouse/podcasts/

He asserts that the bill allows escorts to advertise, rent space, and hire receptionists and bodyguards within normal commercial parameters.

He also says any purchase of sex will be illegal.

He sees no paradox.

How can anyone reason with such insane mentality?

Definitely worth listening to!

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Petey's parliamentary secretary Bob Dechert debated Francoise Boivin (NDP) this morning.

Go to http://www.cbc.ca/thehouse/podcasts/

He asserts that the bill allows escorts to advertise, rent space, and hire receptionists and bodyguards within normal commercial parameters.

He also says any purchase of sex will be illegal.

He sees no paradox.

How can anyone reason with such insane mentality?

Definitely worth listening to!

 

Thanks, Cinelli!

 

For those of you who want to listen to the discussion online:

http://www.cbc.ca/thehouse/popupaudio.html?clipIds=2470941609

 

It's starts at the 27 minute mark.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I loved watching Justin Ling (on twitter) critiquing Dechert's authority on the issue and mocking him for keep bringing up the fact he is a "lawyer" which Dechert mentioned many times during the committee hearings. Basically, Dechert is a dick.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, Dechert found himself to be MacKay's Bum-boy. Whatever stupidity the Conservative government choose to dream up, the flunkies have to get it up the arse (and not very gently).

 

Guys like Dechert are the pawns in this little drama. Happy ass-reaming Dechert! :aol_anal:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wonder how many of them pick up something like C36, look it over, roll their eyes, and say to themselves, "wtf, how I am supposed to go out and defend this BS? I'm going to look like the biggest idiot ever when the SCC overturned it on Dec 14, 2014".

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can't call him a dick. A dick is useful

 

Lol ... I only picked that word because it is very similar in pronunciation. But yes sorry, dicks are very useful ;) plus I love dicks! But only when they are actually attached to someone not as stupid, like Dechert.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...